中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2014年
3期
276-280
,共5页
李毅%高北陵%胡峰%李学武%王轶%吴冬凌
李毅%高北陵%鬍峰%李學武%王軼%吳鼕凌
리의%고북릉%호봉%리학무%왕질%오동릉
司法精神病学%精神障碍者%辨认能力%控制能力%评定量表
司法精神病學%精神障礙者%辨認能力%控製能力%評定量錶
사법정신병학%정신장애자%변인능력%공제능력%평정량표
Forensic psychiatry%Mental disorders%Cognition capacity%Control ability%Scale
目的 检验辨认和控制能力精神医学评定量表(Psychiatric Assessment Scale of Cognitive and Volition Capacity in crime,PASCVC)的实证效度,并制定全国常模.方法 于2009年8月至2011年12月间在全国七大行政区的十五家司法鉴定机构共收集评定辨认和控制能力的司法精神鉴定案例1 000例,由量表评定者用PASCVC、精神病人限定刑事责任能力评定量表(Diminished Criminal Responsibility Rating Scale,DCRRS)和暴力作案行为人刑事责任能力评定量表(Criminal Responsibility Rating Scale of Violence,CRRSV)进行评分,所有案例均由鉴定人做出辨认和控制能力完全丧失、大部分丧失、部分丧失、小部分丧失、稍有受损和正常的六个等级判断.结果 ①依据频数分布表的结果得出:辨认和控制能力完全丧失的划界分为≤56、大部分丧失为57~ 66、部分丧失为67~76、小部分丧失为77~ 87、稍有受损为88~ 100、正常为≥101.②六级划界分评定的等级划分结果与专家鉴定意见的相关为0.939 (P=0.001).③PASCVC与DCRRS和CRRSV的一致性Kappa值分别为0.838和0.835 (P<0.001).④PASCVC量表评定和专家评定两种方法分别建立判别函数,回代判别量表与专家判断的正确率分别为86.9%和85.1%;两种分级结果的一致性Kappa值为0.857 (P<0.001).结论 该量表具有较好的实证效度,可作为辨认和控制能力司法鉴定的客观评定工具.
目的 檢驗辨認和控製能力精神醫學評定量錶(Psychiatric Assessment Scale of Cognitive and Volition Capacity in crime,PASCVC)的實證效度,併製定全國常模.方法 于2009年8月至2011年12月間在全國七大行政區的十五傢司法鑒定機構共收集評定辨認和控製能力的司法精神鑒定案例1 000例,由量錶評定者用PASCVC、精神病人限定刑事責任能力評定量錶(Diminished Criminal Responsibility Rating Scale,DCRRS)和暴力作案行為人刑事責任能力評定量錶(Criminal Responsibility Rating Scale of Violence,CRRSV)進行評分,所有案例均由鑒定人做齣辨認和控製能力完全喪失、大部分喪失、部分喪失、小部分喪失、稍有受損和正常的六箇等級判斷.結果 ①依據頻數分佈錶的結果得齣:辨認和控製能力完全喪失的劃界分為≤56、大部分喪失為57~ 66、部分喪失為67~76、小部分喪失為77~ 87、稍有受損為88~ 100、正常為≥101.②六級劃界分評定的等級劃分結果與專傢鑒定意見的相關為0.939 (P=0.001).③PASCVC與DCRRS和CRRSV的一緻性Kappa值分彆為0.838和0.835 (P<0.001).④PASCVC量錶評定和專傢評定兩種方法分彆建立判彆函數,迴代判彆量錶與專傢判斷的正確率分彆為86.9%和85.1%;兩種分級結果的一緻性Kappa值為0.857 (P<0.001).結論 該量錶具有較好的實證效度,可作為辨認和控製能力司法鑒定的客觀評定工具.
목적 검험변인화공제능력정신의학평정량표(Psychiatric Assessment Scale of Cognitive and Volition Capacity in crime,PASCVC)적실증효도,병제정전국상모.방법 우2009년8월지2011년12월간재전국칠대행정구적십오가사법감정궤구공수집평정변인화공제능력적사법정신감정안례1 000례,유량표평정자용PASCVC、정신병인한정형사책임능력평정량표(Diminished Criminal Responsibility Rating Scale,DCRRS)화폭력작안행위인형사책임능력평정량표(Criminal Responsibility Rating Scale of Violence,CRRSV)진행평분,소유안례균유감정인주출변인화공제능력완전상실、대부분상실、부분상실、소부분상실、초유수손화정상적륙개등급판단.결과 ①의거빈수분포표적결과득출:변인화공제능력완전상실적화계분위≤56、대부분상실위57~ 66、부분상실위67~76、소부분상실위77~ 87、초유수손위88~ 100、정상위≥101.②륙급화계분평정적등급화분결과여전가감정의견적상관위0.939 (P=0.001).③PASCVC여DCRRS화CRRSV적일치성Kappa치분별위0.838화0.835 (P<0.001).④PASCVC량표평정화전가평정량충방법분별건립판별함수,회대판별량표여전가판단적정학솔분별위86.9%화85.1%;량충분급결과적일치성Kappa치위0.857 (P<0.001).결론 해량표구유교호적실증효도,가작위변인화공제능력사법감정적객관평정공구.
Objective To test the cut-off point and empirical validity of psychiatric assessment scale of cognitive and volition capacity for suspects in crime (PASCVC).Methods One thousand of forensic psychiatry cases from fifteen bodies of the seven administrative regions in China were collected for forensic assessment by the three scales of PASCVC,DCRRS and CRRSV in August 2009 to December 201 l.in all cases by the appraiser to make six grade judgment of the cognitive and volition capacity including completely lost,lost most,partial loss,partial loss of a small,slightly damaged and normal.Results ① Based on the results of frequency distribution table: complete loss of demarcation divided < 56 minutes,lost most 57-66,partial loss 67-76,partial loss of a small 77-87,slightly damaged 88-100 and normal ≥ 101.②The correlation coefficient of six demarcation point grading assessment results and expert opinion was 0.939(P<0.001).③PASCVC consistency with DCRRS and CRRSV,the Kappa values were 0.838 and 0.835 respectively(P<0.001).④Discriminant function were established by two methods of PASCVC and expert assessment,the correct rates of PASCVC and expert judgment on back substitution determine were 86.9% and 85.1%.Two kinds of classification results,the Kappa value of 0.857 (P<0.001).Conclusion PASCVC has good empirical validity,and can be used as an objective assessment tool for forensic assessment of criminal cognitive and volition capacity.