中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2014年
3期
281-283
,共3页
辛程%王红艳%柯红艳%毕春霞%程玲%姜兆权%张会君
辛程%王紅豔%柯紅豔%畢春霞%程玲%薑兆權%張會君
신정%왕홍염%가홍염%필춘하%정령%강조권%장회군
慢性疼痛%接受%信度%效度%因子分析
慢性疼痛%接受%信度%效度%因子分析
만성동통%접수%신도%효도%인자분석
Chronic pain%Acceptance%Reliability%Validity%Factor analysis
目的 检验简易慢性疼痛接受问卷(the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8,CPAQ-8)中文版的信效度.方法 将CPAQ-8译成中文,采用便利抽样方法调查223名老年慢性疼痛患者,用相关系数、Cronbach's系数、重测信度系数、探索性因子分析、验证性因子等对CPAQ-8进行检验.结果 中文版CPAQ-8总体平均得分(23.79±5.23)分,活动参与(activity engagement,AE)分量表(12.84±4.96)分,疼痛意愿(Pain willingness,PW)分量表(10.97±2.90)分.各分量表与总量表的相关系数是0.47~0.70(P<0.01).总量表的Cronbach's系数是0.853,Guttmann分半信度系数是0.843;探索性因子分析提取2个公因子,累计贡献率为58.217%;验证性因子分析显示修正模型显著性概率值P=0,322,模型适配指标结果为x2/df=1.124、GFI=0.979、AGFI=0.956、TLI=0.069、RMSEA=0.024、NFI=0.960、TLI=0.992、CFI=0.995.结论 该量表具有良好的信度和效度,可用于慢性疼痛患者的接受程度分析.
目的 檢驗簡易慢性疼痛接受問捲(the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8,CPAQ-8)中文版的信效度.方法 將CPAQ-8譯成中文,採用便利抽樣方法調查223名老年慢性疼痛患者,用相關繫數、Cronbach's繫數、重測信度繫數、探索性因子分析、驗證性因子等對CPAQ-8進行檢驗.結果 中文版CPAQ-8總體平均得分(23.79±5.23)分,活動參與(activity engagement,AE)分量錶(12.84±4.96)分,疼痛意願(Pain willingness,PW)分量錶(10.97±2.90)分.各分量錶與總量錶的相關繫數是0.47~0.70(P<0.01).總量錶的Cronbach's繫數是0.853,Guttmann分半信度繫數是0.843;探索性因子分析提取2箇公因子,纍計貢獻率為58.217%;驗證性因子分析顯示脩正模型顯著性概率值P=0,322,模型適配指標結果為x2/df=1.124、GFI=0.979、AGFI=0.956、TLI=0.069、RMSEA=0.024、NFI=0.960、TLI=0.992、CFI=0.995.結論 該量錶具有良好的信度和效度,可用于慢性疼痛患者的接受程度分析.
목적 검험간역만성동통접수문권(the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire-8,CPAQ-8)중문판적신효도.방법 장CPAQ-8역성중문,채용편리추양방법조사223명노년만성동통환자,용상관계수、Cronbach's계수、중측신도계수、탐색성인자분석、험증성인자등대CPAQ-8진행검험.결과 중문판CPAQ-8총체평균득분(23.79±5.23)분,활동삼여(activity engagement,AE)분량표(12.84±4.96)분,동통의원(Pain willingness,PW)분량표(10.97±2.90)분.각분량표여총량표적상관계수시0.47~0.70(P<0.01).총량표적Cronbach's계수시0.853,Guttmann분반신도계수시0.843;탐색성인자분석제취2개공인자,루계공헌솔위58.217%;험증성인자분석현시수정모형현저성개솔치P=0,322,모형괄배지표결과위x2/df=1.124、GFI=0.979、AGFI=0.956、TLI=0.069、RMSEA=0.024、NFI=0.960、TLI=0.992、CFI=0.995.결론 해량표구유량호적신도화효도,가용우만성동통환자적접수정도분석.
Objective To evaluate reliability and validity the Chinese-version of chronic pain acceptance questionnaire-8(CPAQ-8).Methods The reliability and validity of CPAQ-8 was tested in 223 old patients with chronic pain.Result The Chinese-version of CPAQ-8 was (23.79±-5.23),AE was (12.84±4.96),PW was(10.97 ±2.90).Cronbach' s of CPAQ-8 was 0.853,and Guttmann Split-Half Coefficient was 0.843.Two factors were extracted by factor analysis through exploratory factor analysis,whose cumulative contribution was 58.217%.While confirmatory factor analysis showed probability level of the modified model was P=0.322,with indexes as follows: x2/df =1.124,GFI =0.979,AGFI =0,956,TLI =0.069,RMSEA =0.024,NFI =0.960,TLI =0.992,CFI =0.995.Conclusion Reliability and validity of CPAQ-8 were both well.