中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2014年
4期
369-371
,共3页
失眠%信度%效度%信念%态度
失眠%信度%效度%信唸%態度
실면%신도%효도%신념%태도
Insomnia%Reliability%Validity%Beliefs%Attitudes
目的 研究简式睡眠信念和态度量表(DBAS-16)的信度及效度.方法 采用方便抽样,被试为失眠或伴有失眠症状的轻中度抑郁症、焦虑症的门诊患者,所有被试完成DBAS-16、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS).其中30名被试在2周后再次进行DBAS-16的评定.结果 共230人参与评定,收回有效问卷212份.总量表Cronbachα系数为0.786,各分量表Cronbachα系数为0.424～0.703.总分半信度系数为0.775,各分量表的分半信度系数为0.424～0.719.各条目与总分的相关为0.602～0.283(均P＜0.01).总重测信度为0.928,各分量表的重测信度为0.709～0.907(均P＜0.01).采用验证性因素分析法估计结构效度,拟合指数:x2/df值为1.623,调整拟合优度指数(AGFI)为0.882,近似误差均方根(RMSEA)为0,054,递增拟合指数(IFI)为0.899,非范拟合指数(NNFI)为0.871,相对拟合指数(CFI)为0.895.量表总分与PSQI、SDS、SAS总分的Person相关系数分别为-0.311,-0.192,-0.162,(均P＜0.01).结论 简式睡眠信念和态度量表有较好的信度和效度.
目的 研究簡式睡眠信唸和態度量錶(DBAS-16)的信度及效度.方法 採用方便抽樣,被試為失眠或伴有失眠癥狀的輕中度抑鬱癥、焦慮癥的門診患者,所有被試完成DBAS-16、匹玆堡睡眠質量指數(PSQI)、抑鬱自評量錶(SDS)、焦慮自評量錶(SAS).其中30名被試在2週後再次進行DBAS-16的評定.結果 共230人參與評定,收迴有效問捲212份.總量錶Cronbachα繫數為0.786,各分量錶Cronbachα繫數為0.424～0.703.總分半信度繫數為0.775,各分量錶的分半信度繫數為0.424～0.719.各條目與總分的相關為0.602～0.283(均P＜0.01).總重測信度為0.928,各分量錶的重測信度為0.709～0.907(均P＜0.01).採用驗證性因素分析法估計結構效度,擬閤指數:x2/df值為1.623,調整擬閤優度指數(AGFI)為0.882,近似誤差均方根(RMSEA)為0,054,遞增擬閤指數(IFI)為0.899,非範擬閤指數(NNFI)為0.871,相對擬閤指數(CFI)為0.895.量錶總分與PSQI、SDS、SAS總分的Person相關繫數分彆為-0.311,-0.192,-0.162,(均P＜0.01).結論 簡式睡眠信唸和態度量錶有較好的信度和效度.
목적 연구간식수면신념화태도량표(DBAS-16)적신도급효도.방법 채용방편추양,피시위실면혹반유실면증상적경중도억욱증、초필증적문진환자,소유피시완성DBAS-16、필자보수면질량지수(PSQI)、억욱자평량표(SDS)、초필자평량표(SAS).기중30명피시재2주후재차진행DBAS-16적평정.결과 공230인삼여평정,수회유효문권212빈.총량표Cronbachα계수위0.786,각분량표Cronbachα계수위0.424～0.703.총분반신도계수위0.775,각분량표적분반신도계수위0.424～0.719.각조목여총분적상관위0.602～0.283(균P＜0.01).총중측신도위0.928,각분량표적중측신도위0.709～0.907(균P＜0.01).채용험증성인소분석법고계결구효도,의합지수:x2/df치위1.623,조정의합우도지수(AGFI)위0.882,근사오차균방근(RMSEA)위0,054,체증의합지수(IFI)위0.899,비범의합지수(NNFI)위0.871,상대의합지수(CFI)위0.895.량표총분여PSQI、SDS、SAS총분적Person상관계수분별위-0.311,-0.192,-0.162,(균P＜0.01).결론 간식수면신념화태도량표유교호적신도화효도.
Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the brief version of dysfunctional beliefs and attitudes about sleep(DBAS-16).Methods Participants were out-patients who with insomnia or insomnia comorbided depression disorder or anxiety disorder.All of them were assessed by DBAS-16,Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI),self-rating depression scale (SDS),self-rating anxiety scale (SAS).30 of them were evaluated by DBAS-16 two weeks later.Results 230 patients were assessed,212 pieces of questionnaire with integral answers were collected,The Cronbach α Coefficient of DBAS-16 was 0.786,the Cronbach α coefficients of four subscales were 0.424-0.703.Split-half reliability coefficient of total score was 0.775,split-half reliability coefficient of four subscales were 0.424-0.719.Item-total correlation coefficients ranged from 0.602 to 0.283(all P＜0.05).The testretest reliability coefficient was 0.928,and coefficient of each subscales ranged from 0.709 to 0.907 (all P＜0.05).Confirmatory factor analysis was used to estimate the construct validity.The fit indices:x2/dfwas 1.623,the adjusted goodness of fit index (AGFI) was 0.882,root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) was 0.054,incremental fit index (IFI)was 0.899,non-normed fit index (NNFI) was 0.871,comparative fit index (CFI) was 0.895.Total DBAS-16 score significantly correlated with PSQI(r=-0.311,P＜0.01),SDS(r=-0.192,P＜0.01),SAS(r=-0.162,P＜0.01).Conclusion The reliability and validity of the brief version of DBAS-16 are adequate.
