中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2014年
6期
550-552
,共3页
李妮娜%徐华华%吉峰%冯玉%解卫功
李妮娜%徐華華%吉峰%馮玉%解衛功
리니나%서화화%길봉%풍옥%해위공
场认知方式%自我妨碍%医学生
場認知方式%自我妨礙%醫學生
장인지방식%자아방애%의학생
Field cognition style%Self-handicapping%Medical students
目的 探讨场认知方式与医学生自我妨碍的相关性.方法 采用镶嵌图形测验(EFT)、自我妨碍问卷(SHS)对某医学院124名医学生展开问卷调查.结果 ①医学生自我妨碍得分在是否喜欢所学专业方面差异有统计学意义,喜欢所学专业者自我妨碍得分低于不喜欢者[(33.61±5.21)分,(35.94±5.16)分,t=-0.218,P=0.031];获得奖学金者自我妨碍得分低于未获得者[(33.20±6.19)分,(35.12±4.12)分,t=-0.247,P=0.043];有男(女)朋友自我妨碍得分高于对照组[(35.35±5.48)分,(33.39±5.01)分,t=2.063,P=0.041].②场依存认知方式的医学生群体其自我妨碍得分高于场独立认知方式群体[(35.69±3.91)分,(32.63±6.08)分,t=3.303,P=0.001].③场依存认知方式、不喜欢所学专业、有男(女)朋友成绩对医学生学业自我妨碍有显著的预测作用.结论 场认知方式与自我妨碍存在相关性,场依存认知方式个体的自我妨碍倾向高于场独立认知方式的个体.
目的 探討場認知方式與醫學生自我妨礙的相關性.方法 採用鑲嵌圖形測驗(EFT)、自我妨礙問捲(SHS)對某醫學院124名醫學生展開問捲調查.結果 ①醫學生自我妨礙得分在是否喜歡所學專業方麵差異有統計學意義,喜歡所學專業者自我妨礙得分低于不喜歡者[(33.61±5.21)分,(35.94±5.16)分,t=-0.218,P=0.031];穫得獎學金者自我妨礙得分低于未穫得者[(33.20±6.19)分,(35.12±4.12)分,t=-0.247,P=0.043];有男(女)朋友自我妨礙得分高于對照組[(35.35±5.48)分,(33.39±5.01)分,t=2.063,P=0.041].②場依存認知方式的醫學生群體其自我妨礙得分高于場獨立認知方式群體[(35.69±3.91)分,(32.63±6.08)分,t=3.303,P=0.001].③場依存認知方式、不喜歡所學專業、有男(女)朋友成績對醫學生學業自我妨礙有顯著的預測作用.結論 場認知方式與自我妨礙存在相關性,場依存認知方式箇體的自我妨礙傾嚮高于場獨立認知方式的箇體.
목적 탐토장인지방식여의학생자아방애적상관성.방법 채용양감도형측험(EFT)、자아방애문권(SHS)대모의학원124명의학생전개문권조사.결과 ①의학생자아방애득분재시부희환소학전업방면차이유통계학의의,희환소학전업자자아방애득분저우불희환자[(33.61±5.21)분,(35.94±5.16)분,t=-0.218,P=0.031];획득장학금자자아방애득분저우미획득자[(33.20±6.19)분,(35.12±4.12)분,t=-0.247,P=0.043];유남(녀)붕우자아방애득분고우대조조[(35.35±5.48)분,(33.39±5.01)분,t=2.063,P=0.041].②장의존인지방식적의학생군체기자아방애득분고우장독립인지방식군체[(35.69±3.91)분,(32.63±6.08)분,t=3.303,P=0.001].③장의존인지방식、불희환소학전업、유남(녀)붕우성적대의학생학업자아방애유현저적예측작용.결론 장인지방식여자아방애존재상관성,장의존인지방식개체적자아방애경향고우장독립인지방식적개체.
Objective To explore the relationship between field cognitive style and self-handicapping of medical students.Methods 124 medical students were measured by embedded figure test (EFT) and self-handicapping questionnaire (SHS).Results ①The scores of self-handicapping questionnaire were significantly different in whether they like their major or not(33.61±5.21,35.94±5.16,t=-0.218,P=0.031).Differences were also found in whether they could obtain the scholarships (33.20±6.19,35.12±4.12,t=-0.247,P=0.043),and in whether they were in a relationship(35.35±5.48,33.39±5.01,t=2.063,P=0.041).②Compared with field-independent cognitive style students,Field-dependent cognitive style students ' self-handicapping score was higher (35.69±3.91,32.63±6.08,t=3.303,P=0.001).③Field-dependent cognitive style,dislike their major and be in a relationship were the significant predictors of self-handicapping.Conclusion Correlation exists between field cognitive style and self-handicapping of the medical students.Students who belong to field-dependent cognitive style are more prone to self-handicapping than field-independent cognitive style students.
