中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2014年
7期
636-638
,共3页
杨帆%王牮%童俊%江光荣
楊帆%王牮%童俊%江光榮
양범%왕천%동준%강광영
危险行为%青少年%聚类分析
危險行為%青少年%聚類分析
위험행위%청소년%취류분석
Risk Behavior%Adolescent%Cluster Analysis
目的 探索存在危险行为青少年群体的分组及其组别特征,为完善干预方案提供依据.方法 利用“我国青少年危险行为的评估、预警与干预示范研究”Ⅲ级干预入组青少年干预前的评估数据,结合两步聚类和快速聚类两种聚类分析方法,对根据危险行为已划分为四组的249名入组青少年进行重新分组,比较新的组间差异.结果 两种聚类分析结果的Kappa一致性检验值为0.861(P<0.001),聚类结果稳定.快速聚类分析显示入组青少年分为冲动外显组,自杀高危组,饮食/活动问题组.包括四种危险行为维度均分、中学生心理健康量表总均分、流调中心用抑郁量表总分和焦虑自评量表总分在内的参与聚类的7个变量在三组间差异均有统计学意义,F值为13.874~ 125.753 (P< 0.001).三组性别构成的差异有统计学意义,x2值为59.059(P<0.001),冲动外显组男女比例大于其他两组.结论 对于存在危险行为的青少年群体,聚类分析能较好地将其分组,据此制订的干预方案可能更佳.
目的 探索存在危險行為青少年群體的分組及其組彆特徵,為完善榦預方案提供依據.方法 利用“我國青少年危險行為的評估、預警與榦預示範研究”Ⅲ級榦預入組青少年榦預前的評估數據,結閤兩步聚類和快速聚類兩種聚類分析方法,對根據危險行為已劃分為四組的249名入組青少年進行重新分組,比較新的組間差異.結果 兩種聚類分析結果的Kappa一緻性檢驗值為0.861(P<0.001),聚類結果穩定.快速聚類分析顯示入組青少年分為遲動外顯組,自殺高危組,飲食/活動問題組.包括四種危險行為維度均分、中學生心理健康量錶總均分、流調中心用抑鬱量錶總分和焦慮自評量錶總分在內的參與聚類的7箇變量在三組間差異均有統計學意義,F值為13.874~ 125.753 (P< 0.001).三組性彆構成的差異有統計學意義,x2值為59.059(P<0.001),遲動外顯組男女比例大于其他兩組.結論 對于存在危險行為的青少年群體,聚類分析能較好地將其分組,據此製訂的榦預方案可能更佳.
목적 탐색존재위험행위청소년군체적분조급기조별특정,위완선간예방안제공의거.방법 이용“아국청소년위험행위적평고、예경여간예시범연구”Ⅲ급간예입조청소년간예전적평고수거,결합량보취류화쾌속취류량충취류분석방법,대근거위험행위이화분위사조적249명입조청소년진행중신분조,비교신적조간차이.결과 량충취류분석결과적Kappa일치성검험치위0.861(P<0.001),취류결과은정.쾌속취류분석현시입조청소년분위충동외현조,자살고위조,음식/활동문제조.포괄사충위험행위유도균분、중학생심리건강량표총균분、류조중심용억욱량표총분화초필자평량표총분재내적삼여취류적7개변량재삼조간차이균유통계학의의,F치위13.874~ 125.753 (P< 0.001).삼조성별구성적차이유통계학의의,x2치위59.059(P<0.001),충동외현조남녀비례대우기타량조.결론 대우존재위험행위적청소년군체,취류분석능교호지장기분조,거차제정적간예방안가능경가.
Objective To explore the grouping of youth with health risk behaviors and the characteristics of each group,and to provide the basis for improving intervention programs.Methods This study used data from "Demonstration Research on Assessment,Warning and Intervention of Youth Risk Behaviors in China",with 249 adolescents being enrolled in the tertiary intervention part of this research.Two step cluster analysis and quick cluster analysis were used together to regroup these enrolled adolescents who had been grouped into four groups.The differences among new groups were examined.Results Kappa consistency test showed high consistency between two solutions of cluster analysis (Kappa=0.861,P<0.001),which certified the stability of clustering result.The enrolled adolescents were clustered into three groups:impulsive explicit group,high-risk suicide group and diet/sport problem group.The differences were significant among three groups in 7 variables for clustering,including the dimension mean scores of four risk behaviors,the total mean scores of Mental Health Scale of Middle School Students,the total scores of CES-D and the total scores of SAS (F=13.874-125.753,P<0.001).Sex ratios were significantly different among three groups as well (x2=59.059,P<0.001),and male/female ratio of impulsive explicit group was higher than other two groups.Conclusion Cluster analysis can well group youth with health risk behaviors,and intervention programs might be more effective in view of the above grouping.