中华行为医学与脑科学杂志
中華行為醫學與腦科學雜誌
중화행위의학여뇌과학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE AND BRAIN SCIENCE
2014年
8期
755-759
,共5页
蔡启霞%刘浩%邵云%夏静%韩继阳%何强%战玉华%刘果%Immanuel Decker
蔡啟霞%劉浩%邵雲%夏靜%韓繼暘%何彊%戰玉華%劉果%Immanuel Decker
채계하%류호%소운%하정%한계양%하강%전옥화%류과%Immanuel Decker
气质%性格%信度%效度%人格问卷
氣質%性格%信度%效度%人格問捲
기질%성격%신도%효도%인격문권
Temperament%Character%Reliability%Validity%Personality inventory
目的 评估气质性格量表(TCI-R)中文版在社区样本中的信效度.方法 采用方便抽样方法抽取1 220名成人完成气质性格量表(TCI-R)中文版、抑郁自评量表(SDS)和焦虑自评量表(SAS).一个半月后进行重测.信度采取内部一致性信度及重测信度来测量,对TCI-R的因子结构进行探索性因素分析,采用主成分分析最优斜交转轴法(Promax)来探索人格精神生物模型的潜在因子结构.结果 气质性格量表(TCI-R)七个维度的克隆巴赫系数值从0.677到0.860,重测相关系数从0.708到0.907,探索性因素分析显示气质维度有四个因子,性格维度有三个因子,解释的总变异量分别为59.535%、54.415%.躲避伤害性(HA)分数与SDS(r=0.549,P<0.01)、SAS(r=0.521,P<0.01)分数呈显著正相关,自我定向性(SD)与SDS(r=-0.460,P<0.01)和SAS(r=-0.406,P<0.01)、合作性(CO)与SDS(r=-0.416,P<0.01)和SAS(r=-0.361,P<0.01)、PS与SDS(r=-0.285,P<0.01)和SAS(r=-0.216,P<0.01)分数间均存在显著负相关.结论 TCI-R中文版为七因子结构量表,在中国社区样本中具有良好的信效度,是较好的人格测量问卷.
目的 評估氣質性格量錶(TCI-R)中文版在社區樣本中的信效度.方法 採用方便抽樣方法抽取1 220名成人完成氣質性格量錶(TCI-R)中文版、抑鬱自評量錶(SDS)和焦慮自評量錶(SAS).一箇半月後進行重測.信度採取內部一緻性信度及重測信度來測量,對TCI-R的因子結構進行探索性因素分析,採用主成分分析最優斜交轉軸法(Promax)來探索人格精神生物模型的潛在因子結構.結果 氣質性格量錶(TCI-R)七箇維度的剋隆巴赫繫數值從0.677到0.860,重測相關繫數從0.708到0.907,探索性因素分析顯示氣質維度有四箇因子,性格維度有三箇因子,解釋的總變異量分彆為59.535%、54.415%.躲避傷害性(HA)分數與SDS(r=0.549,P<0.01)、SAS(r=0.521,P<0.01)分數呈顯著正相關,自我定嚮性(SD)與SDS(r=-0.460,P<0.01)和SAS(r=-0.406,P<0.01)、閤作性(CO)與SDS(r=-0.416,P<0.01)和SAS(r=-0.361,P<0.01)、PS與SDS(r=-0.285,P<0.01)和SAS(r=-0.216,P<0.01)分數間均存在顯著負相關.結論 TCI-R中文版為七因子結構量錶,在中國社區樣本中具有良好的信效度,是較好的人格測量問捲.
목적 평고기질성격량표(TCI-R)중문판재사구양본중적신효도.방법 채용방편추양방법추취1 220명성인완성기질성격량표(TCI-R)중문판、억욱자평량표(SDS)화초필자평량표(SAS).일개반월후진행중측.신도채취내부일치성신도급중측신도래측량,대TCI-R적인자결구진행탐색성인소분석,채용주성분분석최우사교전축법(Promax)래탐색인격정신생물모형적잠재인자결구.결과 기질성격량표(TCI-R)칠개유도적극륭파혁계수치종0.677도0.860,중측상관계수종0.708도0.907,탐색성인소분석현시기질유도유사개인자,성격유도유삼개인자,해석적총변이량분별위59.535%、54.415%.타피상해성(HA)분수여SDS(r=0.549,P<0.01)、SAS(r=0.521,P<0.01)분수정현저정상관,자아정향성(SD)여SDS(r=-0.460,P<0.01)화SAS(r=-0.406,P<0.01)、합작성(CO)여SDS(r=-0.416,P<0.01)화SAS(r=-0.361,P<0.01)、PS여SDS(r=-0.285,P<0.01)화SAS(r=-0.216,P<0.01)분수간균존재현저부상관.결론 TCI-R중문판위칠인자결구량표,재중국사구양본중구유량호적신효도,시교호적인격측량문권.
Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the 240-item Chinese version of the Temperament and Character Inventory-Revised (TCI-R) in a chinese community sample.Methods A representative Chinese sample of 1220 adults filled out the Chinese version of TCI-R,Self-rating Depression Scale (SDS) and Self-rating Anxiety (SAS).A test-retest study of the TCI was conducted across one and a half months interval with 84 subjects.Internal consistency was calculated by Cronbach's α.Factor analyses for the temperament and character dimensions were performed using principal component analysis,rotating factors obliquely by Promax,test-retest reliability and the inter correlations between the four temperament dimensions and three character dimensions was analyzed by Pearson correlation analysis.Results The Cronbach's α for the seven TCI-R scales ranged from 0.677 to 0.860.The cumulative variances for temperament and character were 59.535% and 54.415%.SAS and SDS were positively correlated with harm avoidance(r=0.549,r=0.521,P<0.01)) and negatively with persistence (r=-0.285,P<0.01),self-directedness(r=-0.460,P<0.01) and cooperativeness (r=-0.416,P<0.01).An EFA suggested a four-factor structure for temperament domains and a three-factor structure for character domains.Conclusion Factor analysis result shows that the TCI-R scales are consistent with the 7-factor.The factor structure of the Chinese TCI-R is similar to the original factor structure.The results of this study confirm the theory of temperament and character as a seven-factor model of personality.