中国医师杂志
中國醫師雜誌
중국의사잡지
JOURNAL OF CHINESE PHYSICIAN
2013年
4期
453-456
,共4页
常小波%罗亚平%王勤业%徐忠良%危涛%冯夏莺%宁波
常小波%囉亞平%王勤業%徐忠良%危濤%馮夏鶯%寧波
상소파%라아평%왕근업%서충량%위도%풍하앵%저파
腰椎/病理学%椎间盘移位/病理学%关节
腰椎/病理學%椎間盤移位/病理學%關節
요추/병이학%추간반이위/병이학%관절
Lumbar vertebrae/pathology%Intervertebral disk displacement/pathology%Joints
目的 通过撑开腰椎棘突,观察其撑开程度与对应的椎间孔形态变化及小关节位移之间的关系.方法 使用6具新鲜腰椎尸体,制作标本,保留关节突周围关节囊韧带及棘间韧带,通过分别撑开L3-4,L4-5棘突,测量相应节段小关节间相对位移、椎间孔高度及宽度改变.结果 腰椎退变表现为小关节增生,移位,椎间孔形态发生变形,神经根不同程度受到压迫,椎间隙不同程度狭窄等表现.棘突间撑开2 mm,L3-4、L4-5腰椎间孔高度[(15.62 ±0.73)mm、(14.67 ±0.75)mm]较原始状态[(13.89 ±0.77) mm、(12.48 ±0.80)mm]明显增大(t=26.00、16.02,P<0.01);棘突间撑开4mm,L3-4、L4-5腰椎间孔高度[(17.13 ±0.78)mm、(16.74 ±0.76) mm]较原始状态均明显增大(t=36.15、30.69,P<0.01);撑开4 mm椎间孔高度较撑开2 mm有明显增大(t=20.82、21.72,P<0.01);棘突间撑开2 mm,L3-4、L4-5小关节位移[(0.31±0.04) mm、(0.34 ±0.07) mm]较原始状态[(0.63 ±0.03)mm、(0.56 ±0.05)mm]改善,差异均有统计学意义(t=61.97、58.91,P<0.01);棘突间撑开4 mm,L3-4、L4-5小关节位移[(0.10±0.04)mm、(0.12 ±0.06) mm]较原始状态均改善,差异均有统计学意义(t =64.92、65.25,P<0.01);较撑开2 mm差异也有统计学意义(t=18.69、18.88,P<0.01);撑开2 mm椎间孔宽度[(8.65 ±0.38)mm、(7.78 ±0.37) mm]与原始状态比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),在4 mm宽度[(9.03 ±0.41)mm、(8.05 ±0.32) mm]增大差异有统计学意义(t =7.78、7.97,P<0.01).结论 棘突撑开能有效改善小关节位移、增加椎间孔高度,但对于椎间孔宽度的增加需要撑开足够距离.
目的 通過撐開腰椎棘突,觀察其撐開程度與對應的椎間孔形態變化及小關節位移之間的關繫.方法 使用6具新鮮腰椎尸體,製作標本,保留關節突週圍關節囊韌帶及棘間韌帶,通過分彆撐開L3-4,L4-5棘突,測量相應節段小關節間相對位移、椎間孔高度及寬度改變.結果 腰椎退變錶現為小關節增生,移位,椎間孔形態髮生變形,神經根不同程度受到壓迫,椎間隙不同程度狹窄等錶現.棘突間撐開2 mm,L3-4、L4-5腰椎間孔高度[(15.62 ±0.73)mm、(14.67 ±0.75)mm]較原始狀態[(13.89 ±0.77) mm、(12.48 ±0.80)mm]明顯增大(t=26.00、16.02,P<0.01);棘突間撐開4mm,L3-4、L4-5腰椎間孔高度[(17.13 ±0.78)mm、(16.74 ±0.76) mm]較原始狀態均明顯增大(t=36.15、30.69,P<0.01);撐開4 mm椎間孔高度較撐開2 mm有明顯增大(t=20.82、21.72,P<0.01);棘突間撐開2 mm,L3-4、L4-5小關節位移[(0.31±0.04) mm、(0.34 ±0.07) mm]較原始狀態[(0.63 ±0.03)mm、(0.56 ±0.05)mm]改善,差異均有統計學意義(t=61.97、58.91,P<0.01);棘突間撐開4 mm,L3-4、L4-5小關節位移[(0.10±0.04)mm、(0.12 ±0.06) mm]較原始狀態均改善,差異均有統計學意義(t =64.92、65.25,P<0.01);較撐開2 mm差異也有統計學意義(t=18.69、18.88,P<0.01);撐開2 mm椎間孔寬度[(8.65 ±0.38)mm、(7.78 ±0.37) mm]與原始狀態比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),在4 mm寬度[(9.03 ±0.41)mm、(8.05 ±0.32) mm]增大差異有統計學意義(t =7.78、7.97,P<0.01).結論 棘突撐開能有效改善小關節位移、增加椎間孔高度,但對于椎間孔寬度的增加需要撐開足夠距離.
목적 통과탱개요추극돌,관찰기탱개정도여대응적추간공형태변화급소관절위이지간적관계.방법 사용6구신선요추시체,제작표본,보류관절돌주위관절낭인대급극간인대,통과분별탱개L3-4,L4-5극돌,측량상응절단소관절간상대위이、추간공고도급관도개변.결과 요추퇴변표현위소관절증생,이위,추간공형태발생변형,신경근불동정도수도압박,추간극불동정도협착등표현.극돌간탱개2 mm,L3-4、L4-5요추간공고도[(15.62 ±0.73)mm、(14.67 ±0.75)mm]교원시상태[(13.89 ±0.77) mm、(12.48 ±0.80)mm]명현증대(t=26.00、16.02,P<0.01);극돌간탱개4mm,L3-4、L4-5요추간공고도[(17.13 ±0.78)mm、(16.74 ±0.76) mm]교원시상태균명현증대(t=36.15、30.69,P<0.01);탱개4 mm추간공고도교탱개2 mm유명현증대(t=20.82、21.72,P<0.01);극돌간탱개2 mm,L3-4、L4-5소관절위이[(0.31±0.04) mm、(0.34 ±0.07) mm]교원시상태[(0.63 ±0.03)mm、(0.56 ±0.05)mm]개선,차이균유통계학의의(t=61.97、58.91,P<0.01);극돌간탱개4 mm,L3-4、L4-5소관절위이[(0.10±0.04)mm、(0.12 ±0.06) mm]교원시상태균개선,차이균유통계학의의(t =64.92、65.25,P<0.01);교탱개2 mm차이야유통계학의의(t=18.69、18.88,P<0.01);탱개2 mm추간공관도[(8.65 ±0.38)mm、(7.78 ±0.37) mm]여원시상태비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),재4 mm관도[(9.03 ±0.41)mm、(8.05 ±0.32) mm]증대차이유통계학의의(t =7.78、7.97,P<0.01).결론 극돌탱개능유효개선소관절위이、증가추간공고도,단대우추간공관도적증가수요탱개족구거리.
Objective To investigate the relationship among the spinous process open degree,the relative displacement of the lumbar facet joints(LFJ),and the morphologic change of the intervertebral foramina.Methods From Nov 2010 to Jun 2012,a total of 6 human fresh cadaveric spines was used in this study.All the ligaments were kept.The relative displacement of the corresponding segments LFJ,and the change of height and width of intervertebral foramen were measured through the corresponding open L3-4 and L4-5 spinous process,respectively.Results Lumbar degeneration was described with the following indices including the proliferation and displacement of LFJ,deformation of the intervertebral foramen morphogenesis,nerve root oppression,and lumbar intervertebral stenosis.When the interspinous process spacer was opened up to 2 mm,lumbar intervertebral foramen heights at the L3-4 and L4-5 [(15.62 ± 0.73) mm,(14.67 ± 0.75) mm] were significantly increased (t =26.00,16.02,P < 0.01) compared to the original state [(13.89 ± 0.77) mm,(12.48 ± 0.80)mm].When the interspinous process spacer was opened up to 4mm,lumbar intervertebral foramen heights at the L3-4 and L4-5 [(17.13 ± 0.78) mm,(16.74 ± 0.76) mm] were significantly increased (t =36.15,30.69,P < 0.01) compared to the original state.The foraminal height with a 4 mm distraction was significantly greater than the 2 mm distraction (t =20.82,21.72,P <0.01).When the interspinous distraction was 2 mm,L FJ displacement at the L3-4and L4-5 [(0.31 ±0.04) mm,(0.34 ± 0.07) mm] was significantly better than the original state [(0.63 ± 0.03) mm,(0.56±0.05)mm] (t =61.97,58.91,P <0.01).When the interspinous distraction was 4 mm,LFJ displacement at the L3-4 and L4-5 [(0.10 ±0.04) mm,(0.12 ±0.06) mm] was significantly better than the original state (t =18.69,18.88,P <0.01).No significant difference was found in the change of the intervertebral foramen width [(8.65 ± 0.38) mm,(7.78 ± 0.37) mm] at the 2 mm interspinous distraction compared to the original state(P > 0.05),but a statistically significant difference was found at the 4 mm interspinous distraction compared to the original state [(9.03 ± 0.41) mm,(8.05 ± 0.32) mm] (t =7.78,7.97,P < 0.01).Conclusions Spinous process shove off can effectively improve LFJ displacement,and increase the intervertebral foramen height,but the increase of its width needs to shove off enough distance.