中国综合临床
中國綜閤臨床
중국종합림상
CLINICAL MEDICINE OF CHINA
2014年
2期
113-118
,共6页
贾志%郭牧%张丽媛%张云强%梁海青%田树光%宋昱
賈誌%郭牧%張麗媛%張雲彊%樑海青%田樹光%宋昱
가지%곽목%장려원%장운강%량해청%전수광%송욱
心力衰竭%左西孟旦%心功能%广义估计方程
心力衰竭%左西孟旦%心功能%廣義估計方程
심력쇠갈%좌서맹단%심공능%엄의고계방정
Heart failure%Levosimendan%Cardiac function%Generalized estimating equations
目的 评价短期静脉使用左西孟旦对失代偿性心力衰竭患者近期心功能的影响.方法 将160例心力衰竭患者应用计算机随机分为左西孟旦组和对照组各80例.对照组给予利尿剂、血管扩张剂(包括重组人脑利钠肽)、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂或血管紧张素Ⅱ受体拮抗剂、β受体阻滞剂、螺内酯、他汀类等常规药物治疗,左西孟旦组在常规心力衰竭治疗基础上加用左西孟旦静脉维持24 h.观察治疗9d两组呼吸困难好转情况及治疗30 d心功能分级好转情况,比较两组1个月及3个月病死率情况.结果 治疗第9天左西孟旦组呼吸困难改善情况与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P =0.126),但左西孟旦组呼吸困难改善情况在治疗第1天(OR=2.261,95% CI:1.280 ~3.999,P=0.005)、第3天(OR=2.002,95%CI:1.111~3.607,P=0.021)和第5天(OR=1.846,95% CI:1.009~3.377,P=0.047)均优于对照组;校正时间因素后,治疗9d内左西孟旦组呼吸困难改善情况优于对照组(OR=1.956,95%CI:1.156 ~3.310,P=0.013).在治疗第30天左西孟旦组心功能分级好转情况与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.115),但左西孟旦组心功能分级好转在治疗第3天(OR=1.986,95%CI:1.195 ~ 3.300,P=0.008)、第5天(OR=2.268,95%CI:1.329~3.873,P=0.003)、第9天(OR=2.627,95% CI:1.419~4.860,P=0.002)和第14天(OR=2.212,95%CI:1.189 ~4.112,P=0.012)均优于对照组;校正时间因素后,治疗30 d内左西孟旦组心功能分级好转情况优于对照组(OR=1.933,95% CI:1.229~3.040,P=0.004).左西孟旦组与对照组1个月内及3个月内的病死率差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05).结论 左西孟旦能有效改善失代偿性心力衰竭患者的近期心功能.
目的 評價短期靜脈使用左西孟旦對失代償性心力衰竭患者近期心功能的影響.方法 將160例心力衰竭患者應用計算機隨機分為左西孟旦組和對照組各80例.對照組給予利尿劑、血管擴張劑(包括重組人腦利鈉肽)、血管緊張素轉換酶抑製劑或血管緊張素Ⅱ受體拮抗劑、β受體阻滯劑、螺內酯、他汀類等常規藥物治療,左西孟旦組在常規心力衰竭治療基礎上加用左西孟旦靜脈維持24 h.觀察治療9d兩組呼吸睏難好轉情況及治療30 d心功能分級好轉情況,比較兩組1箇月及3箇月病死率情況.結果 治療第9天左西孟旦組呼吸睏難改善情況與對照組比較差異無統計學意義(P =0.126),但左西孟旦組呼吸睏難改善情況在治療第1天(OR=2.261,95% CI:1.280 ~3.999,P=0.005)、第3天(OR=2.002,95%CI:1.111~3.607,P=0.021)和第5天(OR=1.846,95% CI:1.009~3.377,P=0.047)均優于對照組;校正時間因素後,治療9d內左西孟旦組呼吸睏難改善情況優于對照組(OR=1.956,95%CI:1.156 ~3.310,P=0.013).在治療第30天左西孟旦組心功能分級好轉情況與對照組比較差異無統計學意義(P=0.115),但左西孟旦組心功能分級好轉在治療第3天(OR=1.986,95%CI:1.195 ~ 3.300,P=0.008)、第5天(OR=2.268,95%CI:1.329~3.873,P=0.003)、第9天(OR=2.627,95% CI:1.419~4.860,P=0.002)和第14天(OR=2.212,95%CI:1.189 ~4.112,P=0.012)均優于對照組;校正時間因素後,治療30 d內左西孟旦組心功能分級好轉情況優于對照組(OR=1.933,95% CI:1.229~3.040,P=0.004).左西孟旦組與對照組1箇月內及3箇月內的病死率差異均無統計學意義(P均>0.05).結論 左西孟旦能有效改善失代償性心力衰竭患者的近期心功能.
목적 평개단기정맥사용좌서맹단대실대상성심력쇠갈환자근기심공능적영향.방법 장160례심력쇠갈환자응용계산궤수궤분위좌서맹단조화대조조각80례.대조조급여이뇨제、혈관확장제(포괄중조인뇌리납태)、혈관긴장소전환매억제제혹혈관긴장소Ⅱ수체길항제、β수체조체제、라내지、타정류등상규약물치료,좌서맹단조재상규심력쇠갈치료기출상가용좌서맹단정맥유지24 h.관찰치료9d량조호흡곤난호전정황급치료30 d심공능분급호전정황,비교량조1개월급3개월병사솔정황.결과 치료제9천좌서맹단조호흡곤난개선정황여대조조비교차이무통계학의의(P =0.126),단좌서맹단조호흡곤난개선정황재치료제1천(OR=2.261,95% CI:1.280 ~3.999,P=0.005)、제3천(OR=2.002,95%CI:1.111~3.607,P=0.021)화제5천(OR=1.846,95% CI:1.009~3.377,P=0.047)균우우대조조;교정시간인소후,치료9d내좌서맹단조호흡곤난개선정황우우대조조(OR=1.956,95%CI:1.156 ~3.310,P=0.013).재치료제30천좌서맹단조심공능분급호전정황여대조조비교차이무통계학의의(P=0.115),단좌서맹단조심공능분급호전재치료제3천(OR=1.986,95%CI:1.195 ~ 3.300,P=0.008)、제5천(OR=2.268,95%CI:1.329~3.873,P=0.003)、제9천(OR=2.627,95% CI:1.419~4.860,P=0.002)화제14천(OR=2.212,95%CI:1.189 ~4.112,P=0.012)균우우대조조;교정시간인소후,치료30 d내좌서맹단조심공능분급호전정황우우대조조(OR=1.933,95% CI:1.229~3.040,P=0.004).좌서맹단조여대조조1개월내급3개월내적병사솔차이균무통계학의의(P균>0.05).결론 좌서맹단능유효개선실대상성심력쇠갈환자적근기심공능.
Objective To evaluate the improvement effect of levosimendan by vein injection on short term cardiac function of patients with decompensated heart failure.Methods One hundred and sixty patients admitted due to heart failure were randomly divided into levosimendan group and control group (80 subjects for each group).Patients in control group were given a regular therapy including diuretics,vasodilators (including the recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide),angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor(ACEI) or angiotensin Ⅱ receptorantagonists(ARB),β blockers,spironolactone and stain.Patients in levosimendan were administered levosimendan for 24 hours plus regular therapy.The improvements of dyspnoea in 9 days and cardiac function classification in 30 days after therapy were assessed.Mortality of 1 month and 3 month in two group were calculated and compared during follow-up.Results The dyspnoea improvement rate was superior than that of control group during 9 days (OR =1.956,95% CI:1.156-3.310,P =0.013).The improvements in the levosimendan group were better than in the control group at 1 st day (OR =2.261,95 % CI:1.280-3.999,P =0.005),at 3rd (OR =2.002,95 % CI:1.111-3.607,P =0.021) and 5th day (OR =1.846,95 % CI:1.009 -3.377,P =0.047).However,there was no significant difference in term of improving dyspnoea between the levosimendan group and the control group at 9th day (P =0.126).Similarly,the improvement of cardiac function classification in the levosimendan group was superior than the control group during 30 days (OR =1.933,95% CI:1.229-3.040,P =0.004).Although no significant difference was seen regarding of improving cardiac function classification between the two groups at 30th day after treatment (P =0.115),the improvements in the levosimendan group were better than in the control group at 3rd (OR =1.986,95% CI:1.195-3.300,P =0.008),5th (OR =2.268,95 % CI:1.329-3.873,P =0.003),9th (OR =2.627,95 % CI:1.419-4.860,P =0.002) and 14th day(OR =2.212,95% CI:1.189-4.112,P =0.012).Moreover,there was a nonsignificant reduction in terms of mortality in levosimendan group during 1-month and 3-month follow-up compared with control group (P > 0.05).Condusion Levosimendan can effectively improve the short-term cardiac function in patients with decompensated heart failure.