中华创伤骨科杂志
中華創傷骨科雜誌
중화창상골과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA
2013年
1期
23-27
,共5页
陈辉强%章莹%夏虹%符史发%王非%陈述祥
陳輝彊%章瑩%夏虹%符史髮%王非%陳述祥
진휘강%장형%하홍%부사발%왕비%진술상
胫骨骨折%外固定器%骨移植%有限元分析
脛骨骨摺%外固定器%骨移植%有限元分析
경골골절%외고정기%골이식%유한원분석
Tibial fractures%External fixators%Bone transplantation%Finite element analysis
目的 通过有限元分析的方法评价单侧外固定支架联合腓骨移植修复胫骨缺损的初始稳定性. 方法 选取1名男性志愿者,采用64排CT扫描左下肢,数据导入Mimics软件建立正常的胫、腓骨几何模型.以此为基础,应用单、双根腓骨移植结合外固定支架分别重建4个胫骨缺损的三维模型(缺损长度分别为5、10、15、20 cm),采用Hypermesh 10.0软件进行网格划分,在Ansys v.11软件中进行有限元分析,测量腓骨植骨块的压应力、骨折块的相对位移和整个有限元模型的应力集中点.结果 正常胫骨模型的最大von Mises压应力为8.768 MPa,集中区域为胫骨远端1/3.腓骨移植植骨区von Mises压应力和位移随着植骨长度的增加而增加.同样的植骨长度,单腓骨移植植骨区的yon Mises压应力为双腓骨移植的1.37~ 1.77倍.单腓骨移植的腓骨移植块间位移(IFM)较双腓骨移植大1.13~2.45倍.当单腓骨移植块长度为15 cm时,其腓骨移植块IFM为1.28 mm;双腓骨移植长度为20cm,其腓骨移植块IFM为0.96 mm.模型的最大von Mises压应力集中于第2、3骨-钉界面. 结论 在单腓骨移植结合外固定支架的修复胫骨缺损有限元模型上,植骨块长度> 15cm可导致植骨块yonMisesd压应力和IFM过大,胫骨缺损长度>15 cm时应选用双腓骨移植.在选用腓骨移植结合外固定支架修复胫骨缺损时,应特别注意第2、3枚固定针的稳定性.
目的 通過有限元分析的方法評價單側外固定支架聯閤腓骨移植脩複脛骨缺損的初始穩定性. 方法 選取1名男性誌願者,採用64排CT掃描左下肢,數據導入Mimics軟件建立正常的脛、腓骨幾何模型.以此為基礎,應用單、雙根腓骨移植結閤外固定支架分彆重建4箇脛骨缺損的三維模型(缺損長度分彆為5、10、15、20 cm),採用Hypermesh 10.0軟件進行網格劃分,在Ansys v.11軟件中進行有限元分析,測量腓骨植骨塊的壓應力、骨摺塊的相對位移和整箇有限元模型的應力集中點.結果 正常脛骨模型的最大von Mises壓應力為8.768 MPa,集中區域為脛骨遠耑1/3.腓骨移植植骨區von Mises壓應力和位移隨著植骨長度的增加而增加.同樣的植骨長度,單腓骨移植植骨區的yon Mises壓應力為雙腓骨移植的1.37~ 1.77倍.單腓骨移植的腓骨移植塊間位移(IFM)較雙腓骨移植大1.13~2.45倍.噹單腓骨移植塊長度為15 cm時,其腓骨移植塊IFM為1.28 mm;雙腓骨移植長度為20cm,其腓骨移植塊IFM為0.96 mm.模型的最大von Mises壓應力集中于第2、3骨-釘界麵. 結論 在單腓骨移植結閤外固定支架的脩複脛骨缺損有限元模型上,植骨塊長度> 15cm可導緻植骨塊yonMisesd壓應力和IFM過大,脛骨缺損長度>15 cm時應選用雙腓骨移植.在選用腓骨移植結閤外固定支架脩複脛骨缺損時,應特彆註意第2、3枚固定針的穩定性.
목적 통과유한원분석적방법평개단측외고정지가연합비골이식수복경골결손적초시은정성. 방법 선취1명남성지원자,채용64배CT소묘좌하지,수거도입Mimics연건건립정상적경、비골궤하모형.이차위기출,응용단、쌍근비골이식결합외고정지가분별중건4개경골결손적삼유모형(결손장도분별위5、10、15、20 cm),채용Hypermesh 10.0연건진행망격화분,재Ansys v.11연건중진행유한원분석,측량비골식골괴적압응력、골절괴적상대위이화정개유한원모형적응력집중점.결과 정상경골모형적최대von Mises압응력위8.768 MPa,집중구역위경골원단1/3.비골이식식골구von Mises압응력화위이수착식골장도적증가이증가.동양적식골장도,단비골이식식골구적yon Mises압응력위쌍비골이식적1.37~ 1.77배.단비골이식적비골이식괴간위이(IFM)교쌍비골이식대1.13~2.45배.당단비골이식괴장도위15 cm시,기비골이식괴IFM위1.28 mm;쌍비골이식장도위20cm,기비골이식괴IFM위0.96 mm.모형적최대von Mises압응력집중우제2、3골-정계면. 결론 재단비골이식결합외고정지가적수복경골결손유한원모형상,식골괴장도> 15cm가도치식골괴yonMisesd압응력화IFM과대,경골결손장도>15 cm시응선용쌍비골이식.재선용비골이식결합외고정지가수복경골결손시,응특별주의제2、3매고정침적은정성.
Objective To study the stabilities of fibular grafts used to reconstruct large tibial defects with unilateral external fixation.Methods The left lower extremity of a healthy male volunteer was scanned by CT.The CT data were imported into software Mimics 11.0 to construct finite element (FE) models of tibia and fibula with normal contour and geometry.Four models of tibial defects of different lengths (5,10,15,20 cm) were reconstructed to simulate unilateral external fixation together with single free vascularized fibular graft (SFVFG) and double-barrel free vascularized fibular graft (DBFVFG).The models were imported into software Hypermesh 10.0 to generate meshes.FE analysis was conducted using software ANSYS v.11 to measure inter-fragmentary motion (IFM) and von Mises stress on the fibular graft and locations of maximum yon Mises stress in the whole FE model.Results In the model of normal tibia the peak value of von Mises stress was 8.768 MPa and the maximal von Mises stress was located at the distal third of the tibia.Values of yon Mises stress and IFM increased as the length of fibular graft increased in both SFVFG and DBFVFG models.For the same graft length,the yon Mises stress in the SFVFG model was 1.37 to 1.77 times higher than that in the DBFVFG model and the graft IFM in the former 1.13 to 2.45 times higher than that in the latter.When the graft length was greater than 15 cm in the SFVFG model,the graft IFM exceeded 1.28mm; when the graft length was greater than 20 cm in the DBFVFG model,the graft IFM was only 0.96 mm.The maximum von Mises stress in the FE models was frequently located at the second or third pin-bone interface.Conclusions The present FE models suggest that because a fibular graft longer than 15 cm may result in excessive von Mises stress and IFM,DBFVFG should be used in reconstruction of a tibial defect larger than 15 cm with unilateral external fixation.The second and third pin-bone interfaces require intensive carefulness from the medical staff in the reconstruction of large tibial defects with unilateral external fixation plus a fibular graft.