中华放射学杂志
中華放射學雜誌
중화방사학잡지
Chinese Journal of Radiology
2013年
12期
1128-1131
,共4页
牡丹%田传帅%余鸿鸣%朱斌%陈伟博%Queenie Chan
牡丹%田傳帥%餘鴻鳴%硃斌%陳偉博%Queenie Chan
모단%전전수%여홍명%주빈%진위박%Queenie Chan
磁共振成像%心脏
磁共振成像%心髒
자공진성상%심장
Magnetic resonance imaging%Heart
目的 探讨多源射频发射(MT)技术在改善心脏平衡式快速场回波(BFFE)电影序列图像中的作用.方法 15名志愿者进行3.0 TMR心脏成像,用和不用MT技术分别采集B1图.用不同的采集方法单源射频发射技术(ST)、MT、短TR多源射频发射技术(MTS)采集左室短轴面及四腔心位BFFE心脏电影图像.对B1场均匀性和对比噪声比(CNR)进行定量分析,B1均匀性用感兴趣区内像素值表示,采用Student t检验进行比较.CNR=(SI心室-SI室间隔)/0.5×(SD心室+SD室间隔),采用单因素方差分析比较3组CNR,用LSD方法进行两两比较.按4分值对图像质量进行评分,采用Friedman秩和检验比较3组评分结果,用Wilcoxon秩和检验进行两两比较.2名医师双盲法阅片,采用Kappa检验比较2名医师间评分的一致性.结果 在其他扫描参数不变的情况下,采用MT技术的图像B1场均匀性明显高于传统单源射频(ST)技术的图像均匀性(t=21.632,P<0.01).使用ST、MT和MTS技术时,左心室CNR分别为10.8±2.2、14.4±2.4和14.1±2.2,右心室CNR分别为7.7±1.2、12.2±1.4及12.0±1.2,差异均有统计学意义(F值分别为11.617、61.472,P值均<0.01).两两比较,多源组均高于单源组,差异有统计学意义,而2个多源组间CNR差异无统计学意义.医师1、2使用ST、MT和MTS技术的图像评分分别为(4.60±1.18)、(6.53±1.19)、(6.73±1.03)和(4.73±1.10)、(6.67±1.29)、(6.73±0.88)分,3组间评分结果差异有统计学意义(x2分别为23.577、24.275,P值均<0.01).与ST组相比较,MT组和MTS组的图像质量明显改善,差异有统计学意义.2位医师的评分结果一致性较好,ST、MT及MTS时的K值分别为0.643、0.722及0.814(P值<0.05).结论 采用MT技术可以明显提高CNR及B1均匀性,明显改善图像质量,减少伪影,还可以在正常特殊吸收率(SAR)范围内缩短TR值,增加扫描速度.
目的 探討多源射頻髮射(MT)技術在改善心髒平衡式快速場迴波(BFFE)電影序列圖像中的作用.方法 15名誌願者進行3.0 TMR心髒成像,用和不用MT技術分彆採集B1圖.用不同的採集方法單源射頻髮射技術(ST)、MT、短TR多源射頻髮射技術(MTS)採集左室短軸麵及四腔心位BFFE心髒電影圖像.對B1場均勻性和對比譟聲比(CNR)進行定量分析,B1均勻性用感興趣區內像素值錶示,採用Student t檢驗進行比較.CNR=(SI心室-SI室間隔)/0.5×(SD心室+SD室間隔),採用單因素方差分析比較3組CNR,用LSD方法進行兩兩比較.按4分值對圖像質量進行評分,採用Friedman秩和檢驗比較3組評分結果,用Wilcoxon秩和檢驗進行兩兩比較.2名醫師雙盲法閱片,採用Kappa檢驗比較2名醫師間評分的一緻性.結果 在其他掃描參數不變的情況下,採用MT技術的圖像B1場均勻性明顯高于傳統單源射頻(ST)技術的圖像均勻性(t=21.632,P<0.01).使用ST、MT和MTS技術時,左心室CNR分彆為10.8±2.2、14.4±2.4和14.1±2.2,右心室CNR分彆為7.7±1.2、12.2±1.4及12.0±1.2,差異均有統計學意義(F值分彆為11.617、61.472,P值均<0.01).兩兩比較,多源組均高于單源組,差異有統計學意義,而2箇多源組間CNR差異無統計學意義.醫師1、2使用ST、MT和MTS技術的圖像評分分彆為(4.60±1.18)、(6.53±1.19)、(6.73±1.03)和(4.73±1.10)、(6.67±1.29)、(6.73±0.88)分,3組間評分結果差異有統計學意義(x2分彆為23.577、24.275,P值均<0.01).與ST組相比較,MT組和MTS組的圖像質量明顯改善,差異有統計學意義.2位醫師的評分結果一緻性較好,ST、MT及MTS時的K值分彆為0.643、0.722及0.814(P值<0.05).結論 採用MT技術可以明顯提高CNR及B1均勻性,明顯改善圖像質量,減少偽影,還可以在正常特殊吸收率(SAR)範圍內縮短TR值,增加掃描速度.
목적 탐토다원사빈발사(MT)기술재개선심장평형식쾌속장회파(BFFE)전영서렬도상중적작용.방법 15명지원자진행3.0 TMR심장성상,용화불용MT기술분별채집B1도.용불동적채집방법단원사빈발사기술(ST)、MT、단TR다원사빈발사기술(MTS)채집좌실단축면급사강심위BFFE심장전영도상.대B1장균균성화대비조성비(CNR)진행정량분석,B1균균성용감흥취구내상소치표시,채용Student t검험진행비교.CNR=(SI심실-SI실간격)/0.5×(SD심실+SD실간격),채용단인소방차분석비교3조CNR,용LSD방법진행량량비교.안4분치대도상질량진행평분,채용Friedman질화검험비교3조평분결과,용Wilcoxon질화검험진행량량비교.2명의사쌍맹법열편,채용Kappa검험비교2명의사간평분적일치성.결과 재기타소묘삼수불변적정황하,채용MT기술적도상B1장균균성명현고우전통단원사빈(ST)기술적도상균균성(t=21.632,P<0.01).사용ST、MT화MTS기술시,좌심실CNR분별위10.8±2.2、14.4±2.4화14.1±2.2,우심실CNR분별위7.7±1.2、12.2±1.4급12.0±1.2,차이균유통계학의의(F치분별위11.617、61.472,P치균<0.01).량량비교,다원조균고우단원조,차이유통계학의의,이2개다원조간CNR차이무통계학의의.의사1、2사용ST、MT화MTS기술적도상평분분별위(4.60±1.18)、(6.53±1.19)、(6.73±1.03)화(4.73±1.10)、(6.67±1.29)、(6.73±0.88)분,3조간평분결과차이유통계학의의(x2분별위23.577、24.275,P치균<0.01).여ST조상비교,MT조화MTS조적도상질량명현개선,차이유통계학의의.2위의사적평분결과일치성교호,ST、MT급MTS시적K치분별위0.643、0.722급0.814(P치<0.05).결론 채용MT기술가이명현제고CNR급B1균균성,명현개선도상질량,감소위영,환가이재정상특수흡수솔(SAR)범위내축단TR치,증가소묘속도.
Objective To assess the advantages of multi-source RF transmission(MT) for balanced fast field echo(BFFE) cardiac cine imaging.Methods Fifteen volunteers were scanned on a clinical 3.0 T MR system equipped with MT.Acquisition of B1 maps with and without MT were followed by axial and four chambers BFFE cine imaging for all subjects with different transmission modes[single source RF transmission (ST),MT and MT with allowable shortest TR(MTS)].The B1 field uniformity and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) were quantitatively analyzed.The B1 field uniformity was evaluated by the pixel values within the ROI and was compared with Student t test.CNR was defined as follows:(SIblood-SImyocardium)/ 0.5 ×(SDblood + SDmyocardium).CNR were tested with one-way ANOVA for three groups comparision and with LSD for inter-group comparison.Image qualities were blindly assessed by 2 readers with a 4-score scale.Global image quality scores were tested for statistical significance by using the nonparametric paired sample Friedman rank test for three groups and the Wilcoxon signed rank test for further inter-group comparison.The Kappa statistics was used to assess interreader agreement.Results B1 homogeneity was significantly improved for images with MT compared with ST under the condition of other parameters unchanged (t =21.632,P <0.01).In left ventricular,CNR of blood and myocardium was improved from 10.8 ±2.2 for ST to 14.4 ± 2.4 for MT and 14.1 ± 2.2 for MTS.In fight ventricular,it was improved from 7.7 ± 1.2 for ST to 12.2 ± 1.4 for MT and 12.0 ± 1.2 for MTS.The differences were statistically significant (F =11.617,61.472,P <0.01).The images of MT and MTS groups demonstrated greater CNR versus the ST images.There was no statistical difference between latter two groups.The image scores of Reader 1 and 2 were 4.60 ± 1.18 and 4.73 ± 1.10 for ST,6.53 ± 1.19 and 6.67 ± 1.29 for MT and 6.73 ± 1.03 and 6.73 ± 0.88 for MTS respectively.There were statistically differences among three groups (x2 =23.577,24.275,P < 0.01).The image quality was improved on BFFE images using MT and MTS technology compared to ST technology,and there were also significant differences.The interreader agreement between two readers was good [K=0.643,0.722 and 0.814(P <0.05) for ST,MT,and MTS group respectively].Conclusions MT technology significantly improves B1 field uniformity,increases CNR and reduces artifact on BFFE cardiac cine images.The TR is decreased within the normal SAR ranges,and thus scanning speed is increased.