中华放射医学与防护杂志
中華放射醫學與防護雜誌
중화방사의학여방호잡지
Chinese Journal of Radiological Medicine and Protection
2013年
5期
551-554
,共4页
朱景雨%李惠民%陈兆学%丁茗%薛建平%蔡静%樊能%朱礼华%翁亚芳
硃景雨%李惠民%陳兆學%丁茗%薛建平%蔡靜%樊能%硃禮華%翁亞芳
주경우%리혜민%진조학%정명%설건평%채정%번능%주례화%옹아방
门静脉%辐射剂量%血管造影术%体层摄影术%迭代重建
門靜脈%輻射劑量%血管造影術%體層攝影術%迭代重建
문정맥%복사제량%혈관조영술%체층섭영술%질대중건
Portal vein%Radiation dose%Angiography%Tomography%Iterative reconstruction
目的 探讨多层螺旋CT(MSCT)低kV门静脉成像的可行性以及相关图像质量评价.方法 连续31例门静脉成像患者纳入研究,以3.0 mL/s速率经肘正中静脉注射欧乃派克(350 mgI/ml)90 ml,使用256层CT(Philips Brilliance iCT)机型分别完成动脉期(120 kV,150 mAs)和门脉期(80 kV,120 mAs)扫描,记录两次扫描时的平均容积CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)和辐射剂量长度乘积(DLP),并计算有效辐射剂量(E).对门脉期数据采用4组不同滤波函数进行回顾性重建:A组,滤过反投影(FBP)+平滑函数;B组,FBP+标准函数;C组,迭代4(iDose4)+标准函数;D组,迭代6(iDose4)+标准函数.在工作站上分别完成门脉血管重建的最大密度投影(MIP)、容积重建(VR)和多平面投影重建(MPR)显示,并在门脉分支中心层面分别测量腹主动脉、门脉、肝右叶实质3个结构的CT值和图像噪声(SD)值.由2位资深放射科医生和1位CT技师共同评价门脉图像质量.结果 门脉期扫描(低剂量)的DLP与E分别是(81.23±7.46)mGy·cm和(1.22±0.11)mSv,均明显低于动脉期(常规剂量)的(353.45±31.46)mGy·cm和(5.30±0.47)mSv(F=2197.23,P<0.05);各组间SD值有明显差异(F=54.364,P<0.05),以D组(57.09±13.59)最小,B组(115.55±31.12)最大.所有4组门脉图像均符合诊断图像质量要求,C和D两组门脉显示优于A和B两组.结论 80 kV结合迭代算法的低剂量MSCT门脉成像是可行的.
目的 探討多層螺鏇CT(MSCT)低kV門靜脈成像的可行性以及相關圖像質量評價.方法 連續31例門靜脈成像患者納入研究,以3.0 mL/s速率經肘正中靜脈註射歐迺派剋(350 mgI/ml)90 ml,使用256層CT(Philips Brilliance iCT)機型分彆完成動脈期(120 kV,150 mAs)和門脈期(80 kV,120 mAs)掃描,記錄兩次掃描時的平均容積CT劑量指數(CTDIvol)和輻射劑量長度乘積(DLP),併計算有效輻射劑量(E).對門脈期數據採用4組不同濾波函數進行迴顧性重建:A組,濾過反投影(FBP)+平滑函數;B組,FBP+標準函數;C組,迭代4(iDose4)+標準函數;D組,迭代6(iDose4)+標準函數.在工作站上分彆完成門脈血管重建的最大密度投影(MIP)、容積重建(VR)和多平麵投影重建(MPR)顯示,併在門脈分支中心層麵分彆測量腹主動脈、門脈、肝右葉實質3箇結構的CT值和圖像譟聲(SD)值.由2位資深放射科醫生和1位CT技師共同評價門脈圖像質量.結果 門脈期掃描(低劑量)的DLP與E分彆是(81.23±7.46)mGy·cm和(1.22±0.11)mSv,均明顯低于動脈期(常規劑量)的(353.45±31.46)mGy·cm和(5.30±0.47)mSv(F=2197.23,P<0.05);各組間SD值有明顯差異(F=54.364,P<0.05),以D組(57.09±13.59)最小,B組(115.55±31.12)最大.所有4組門脈圖像均符閤診斷圖像質量要求,C和D兩組門脈顯示優于A和B兩組.結論 80 kV結閤迭代算法的低劑量MSCT門脈成像是可行的.
목적 탐토다층라선CT(MSCT)저kV문정맥성상적가행성이급상관도상질량평개.방법 련속31례문정맥성상환자납입연구,이3.0 mL/s속솔경주정중정맥주사구내파극(350 mgI/ml)90 ml,사용256층CT(Philips Brilliance iCT)궤형분별완성동맥기(120 kV,150 mAs)화문맥기(80 kV,120 mAs)소묘,기록량차소묘시적평균용적CT제량지수(CTDIvol)화복사제량장도승적(DLP),병계산유효복사제량(E).대문맥기수거채용4조불동려파함수진행회고성중건:A조,려과반투영(FBP)+평활함수;B조,FBP+표준함수;C조,질대4(iDose4)+표준함수;D조,질대6(iDose4)+표준함수.재공작참상분별완성문맥혈관중건적최대밀도투영(MIP)、용적중건(VR)화다평면투영중건(MPR)현시,병재문맥분지중심층면분별측량복주동맥、문맥、간우협실질3개결구적CT치화도상조성(SD)치.유2위자심방사과의생화1위CT기사공동평개문맥도상질량.결과 문맥기소묘(저제량)적DLP여E분별시(81.23±7.46)mGy·cm화(1.22±0.11)mSv,균명현저우동맥기(상규제량)적(353.45±31.46)mGy·cm화(5.30±0.47)mSv(F=2197.23,P<0.05);각조간SD치유명현차이(F=54.364,P<0.05),이D조(57.09±13.59)최소,B조(115.55±31.12)최대.소유4조문맥도상균부합진단도상질량요구,C화D량조문맥현시우우A화B량조.결론 80 kV결합질대산법적저제량MSCT문맥성상시가행적.
Objective To explore the feasibility and image quality of MSCT portal vein(PV)imaging with low-voltage.Methods The consecutive 31 patients were enrolled in the study.Ninety milliliter omnipaque(350 mg I/ml)with the rate of 3 ml/s was administrated through the median cubital vein.The arterial(120 kV,150 mAs)and PV(80 kV,120 mAs)phase scans were undertaken with a Philips Brilliance iCT scanner.The CTDIvol and DLP were stored and the effective dose(E)was calculated.Four PV image series were reconstructed with(A)FBP+smooth,(B)FBP+standard,(C)iDose4-4+standard,and(D)iDose4-6+standard algorithm.The maximum intensity projection,volume rendering and multiplanar reformation of portal vein were conducted on a workstation.The CT values of ROI of the aorta,PV,and liver parenchyma were measured,and the SD was considered as the noise.Two experienced radiologists and one technician together reviewed the images.Resnlts The DLP and E was significantly smaller in PV phases than that in arterial phases[low-dose:(81.23 ±7.46)mGy· cm,(1.22 ±0.11)mSv;routine dose:(353.45 ±31.46)mGy·cm,(5.30 ±0.47)mSv,F=2197.23,P<0.05).The noises were different among the groups with that smallest in group D and largest in group B.All PV images were sufficient for diagnosis but those in the group C and D were better.Conclusions The hybrid low-dose MSCT PV imaging with 80 kV combined iterative method would be feasible.