中华放射肿瘤学杂志
中華放射腫瘤學雜誌
중화방사종류학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY
2012年
6期
550-553
,共4页
朱金汉%陈立新%靳光华%曹午飞%邓小武%刘小伟
硃金漢%陳立新%靳光華%曹午飛%鄧小武%劉小偉
주금한%진립신%근광화%조오비%산소무%류소위
电子射野影像装置%容积调强弧形疗法%二维剂量验证%质量保证
電子射野影像裝置%容積調彊弧形療法%二維劑量驗證%質量保證
전자사야영상장치%용적조강호형요법%이유제량험증%질량보증
Electronic portal imaging devices%Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy%Two-dimensional dosimetric verifications%Quality assure
目的 基于电子射野影像装置(EPID)建立二维剂量精确重建模型并验证容积调强弧形治疗(VIMAT)剂量,与其他测量工具进行比较与分析.方法 采用EPID进行VIMAT的二维剂量验证,基于卷积、反卷积以及修正函数建立二维剂量重建模型.通过电离室测量的离轴比剂量曲线并用最小二乘法确定计算模型参数.对12例不同部位肿瘤患者的VIMAT计划用电离室测量中心点剂量,采用其他平面剂量测量工具测量相应平面剂量分布.所有工具测量深度均设置为10 cm,并采用γ分析法比较测量结果.结果 对中心点绝对剂量,EPID与电离室测量结果偏差<1.5%.对平面剂量,2%2 mm标准下EPID与Seven29、Matrixx的平均γ通过率分别为98.9%、99.8%,3%3 mm标准下EPID与治疗计划系统计算结果的平均γ通过率为99.9%.结论 基于EPID建立的二维剂量重建模型能很好地用于调强放疗二维剂量验证工作,今后将考虑将该模型拓展到均匀模体的三维剂量验证中.
目的 基于電子射野影像裝置(EPID)建立二維劑量精確重建模型併驗證容積調彊弧形治療(VIMAT)劑量,與其他測量工具進行比較與分析.方法 採用EPID進行VIMAT的二維劑量驗證,基于捲積、反捲積以及脩正函數建立二維劑量重建模型.通過電離室測量的離軸比劑量麯線併用最小二乘法確定計算模型參數.對12例不同部位腫瘤患者的VIMAT計劃用電離室測量中心點劑量,採用其他平麵劑量測量工具測量相應平麵劑量分佈.所有工具測量深度均設置為10 cm,併採用γ分析法比較測量結果.結果 對中心點絕對劑量,EPID與電離室測量結果偏差<1.5%.對平麵劑量,2%2 mm標準下EPID與Seven29、Matrixx的平均γ通過率分彆為98.9%、99.8%,3%3 mm標準下EPID與治療計劃繫統計算結果的平均γ通過率為99.9%.結論 基于EPID建立的二維劑量重建模型能很好地用于調彊放療二維劑量驗證工作,今後將攷慮將該模型拓展到均勻模體的三維劑量驗證中.
목적 기우전자사야영상장치(EPID)건립이유제량정학중건모형병험증용적조강호형치료(VIMAT)제량,여기타측량공구진행비교여분석.방법 채용EPID진행VIMAT적이유제량험증,기우권적、반권적이급수정함수건립이유제량중건모형.통과전리실측량적리축비제량곡선병용최소이승법학정계산모형삼수.대12례불동부위종류환자적VIMAT계화용전리실측량중심점제량,채용기타평면제량측량공구측량상응평면제량분포.소유공구측량심도균설치위10 cm,병채용γ분석법비교측량결과.결과 대중심점절대제량,EPID여전리실측량결과편차<1.5%.대평면제량,2%2 mm표준하EPID여Seven29、Matrixx적평균γ통과솔분별위98.9%、99.8%,3%3 mm표준하EPID여치료계화계통계산결과적평균γ통과솔위99.9%.결론 기우EPID건립적이유제량중건모형능흔호지용우조강방료이유제량험증공작,금후장고필장해모형탁전도균균모체적삼유제량험증중.
Objective To develop an accurate 2D dose reconstruction model using electronic portal imaging device (EPID).2D dosimetric verifications of volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy (VIMAT)were done using the model.And the results were compared to other dosimeters.Methods The EPID-based dose reconstruction model was using convolve,deconvolve and correction function.The dose profiles which were obtained by the ion chamber were used to determine the model parameters.A total of 12 VIMAT plans for the treatment of anatomical sites of various complexities were chosen.The results obtained from EPID were compared to other dosimeters and treatment planning system (TPS).The ion chamber was used to measure the central point absolute doses.Other dosimeters were used to measure the plane dose distributions.All dosimeters measured the dose at 10 cm depth.The results were analyzed using γevaluation method.Results Regarding absolute central point doses,the ion chamber results were within 1.5% of the EPID results.For the comparison to Seven29 and Matrixx,the average γ pass rates with 2%and 2 mm criteria were 98.9% and 99.8% respectively.For the dose distributions measured by EPID and calculated by TPS,the γ pass rates with 3% and 3 mm criteria were 99.9%.Conclusions The presented results which were obtained from the comparison of measured and calculated doses show the reliability of our EPID-based dose reconstruction model.With the model,EPID can be a reliable and fast tool for IMRT plan dosimetric verification.The model expanded to the 3D dosimetric verification in the uniform phantom will be considered as the next work.