中华骨科杂志
中華骨科雜誌
중화골과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS
2014年
4期
425-430
,共6页
李庆虎%周东生%杨永良%李连欣%王国栋%王永会
李慶虎%週東生%楊永良%李連訢%王國棟%王永會
리경호%주동생%양영량%리련흔%왕국동%왕영회
骨盆%骨折%栓塞,治疗性%内填塞
骨盆%骨摺%栓塞,治療性%內填塞
골분%골절%전새,치료성%내전새
Pelvis%Fractures,bone%Embolization,therapeutic%Endotamponade
目的 比较纱布填塞术与造影栓塞术在骨盆骨折大出血治疗中的效能.方法 回顾性分析2004年4月至2012年4月治疗43例骨盆骨折大出血的患者资料.按照骨盆骨折的救治流程进行救治,其中26例应用纱布填塞术(填塞组),17例应用造影栓塞术(栓塞组).填塞组26例,男15例,女11例;平均年龄41.6岁;车祸伤12例,坠落伤8例,砸伤6例;骨盆骨折Tile分型:B型16例,C型10例,其中4例为开放性骨盆骨折,5例伴有腹部脏器损伤.栓塞组17例,男10例,女7例;平均年龄39.2岁;车祸伤9例,坠落伤5例,砸伤3例;骨盆骨折Tile分型:A型2例,B型11例,C型4例.比较两组患者的创伤严重程度评分(ISS)、手术时间、输血量、并发症等.结果 填塞组平均ISS评分为(52.4±15.3)分,栓塞组为(40.6±12.4)分;填塞组平均手术时间为(42.0±2.1) min,栓塞组为(86.0±3.6)min;填塞组术后24 h内输血量平均为(6.0±1.6)U,栓塞组为(10.0±2.1)U;填塞组ICU住院时间平均为(8.0±3.6)d,栓塞组为(11.0±1.8)d;以上指标两者比较差异均有统计学意义.填塞组术前输血量平均为(15.0±4.7)U,栓塞组为(13.0±5.4)U,两者比较差异无统计学意义.填塞组2例行二次纱布填塞止血,栓塞组6例行二次纱布填塞治疗.填塞组术后5例死亡,无因大出血而死亡的患者;栓塞组术后4例死亡,1例因大出血而于术后32 h死亡.填塞组3例患者术后7~9d发生深部感染,其中1例于术后第16天死亡,另2例与栓塞组1例(术后第9天发生浅表感染)经换药处理后好转.结论 纱布填塞术较造影栓塞术手术时间短,止血效果确切,可明显减少术后输血量、ICU住院时间及术后的死亡率,更适用于我国国情及基层医院的骨盆骨折出血的抢救.
目的 比較紗佈填塞術與造影栓塞術在骨盆骨摺大齣血治療中的效能.方法 迴顧性分析2004年4月至2012年4月治療43例骨盆骨摺大齣血的患者資料.按照骨盆骨摺的救治流程進行救治,其中26例應用紗佈填塞術(填塞組),17例應用造影栓塞術(栓塞組).填塞組26例,男15例,女11例;平均年齡41.6歲;車禍傷12例,墜落傷8例,砸傷6例;骨盆骨摺Tile分型:B型16例,C型10例,其中4例為開放性骨盆骨摺,5例伴有腹部髒器損傷.栓塞組17例,男10例,女7例;平均年齡39.2歲;車禍傷9例,墜落傷5例,砸傷3例;骨盆骨摺Tile分型:A型2例,B型11例,C型4例.比較兩組患者的創傷嚴重程度評分(ISS)、手術時間、輸血量、併髮癥等.結果 填塞組平均ISS評分為(52.4±15.3)分,栓塞組為(40.6±12.4)分;填塞組平均手術時間為(42.0±2.1) min,栓塞組為(86.0±3.6)min;填塞組術後24 h內輸血量平均為(6.0±1.6)U,栓塞組為(10.0±2.1)U;填塞組ICU住院時間平均為(8.0±3.6)d,栓塞組為(11.0±1.8)d;以上指標兩者比較差異均有統計學意義.填塞組術前輸血量平均為(15.0±4.7)U,栓塞組為(13.0±5.4)U,兩者比較差異無統計學意義.填塞組2例行二次紗佈填塞止血,栓塞組6例行二次紗佈填塞治療.填塞組術後5例死亡,無因大齣血而死亡的患者;栓塞組術後4例死亡,1例因大齣血而于術後32 h死亡.填塞組3例患者術後7~9d髮生深部感染,其中1例于術後第16天死亡,另2例與栓塞組1例(術後第9天髮生淺錶感染)經換藥處理後好轉.結論 紗佈填塞術較造影栓塞術手術時間短,止血效果確切,可明顯減少術後輸血量、ICU住院時間及術後的死亡率,更適用于我國國情及基層醫院的骨盆骨摺齣血的搶救.
목적 비교사포전새술여조영전새술재골분골절대출혈치료중적효능.방법 회고성분석2004년4월지2012년4월치료43례골분골절대출혈적환자자료.안조골분골절적구치류정진행구치,기중26례응용사포전새술(전새조),17례응용조영전새술(전새조).전새조26례,남15례,녀11례;평균년령41.6세;차화상12례,추락상8례,잡상6례;골분골절Tile분형:B형16례,C형10례,기중4례위개방성골분골절,5례반유복부장기손상.전새조17례,남10례,녀7례;평균년령39.2세;차화상9례,추락상5례,잡상3례;골분골절Tile분형:A형2례,B형11례,C형4례.비교량조환자적창상엄중정도평분(ISS)、수술시간、수혈량、병발증등.결과 전새조평균ISS평분위(52.4±15.3)분,전새조위(40.6±12.4)분;전새조평균수술시간위(42.0±2.1) min,전새조위(86.0±3.6)min;전새조술후24 h내수혈량평균위(6.0±1.6)U,전새조위(10.0±2.1)U;전새조ICU주원시간평균위(8.0±3.6)d,전새조위(11.0±1.8)d;이상지표량자비교차이균유통계학의의.전새조술전수혈량평균위(15.0±4.7)U,전새조위(13.0±5.4)U,량자비교차이무통계학의의.전새조2례행이차사포전새지혈,전새조6례행이차사포전새치료.전새조술후5례사망,무인대출혈이사망적환자;전새조술후4례사망,1례인대출혈이우술후32 h사망.전새조3례환자술후7~9d발생심부감염,기중1례우술후제16천사망,령2례여전새조1례(술후제9천발생천표감염)경환약처리후호전.결론 사포전새술교조영전새술수술시간단,지혈효과학절,가명현감소술후수혈량、ICU주원시간급술후적사망솔,경괄용우아국국정급기층의원적골분골절출혈적창구.
Objective To compare the efficiency of the pelvic packing and the angioembolization for controlling pelvic fracture hemorrhoea.Methods Data of 43 consecutive patients with pelvic fracture hemorrhoea who were enrolled in our hospital from April 2004 to April 2012 were retrospectively analyzed.There were 26 patients who had undergone pelvic packing,including 15 men and 11 women with an average age of 41.6 years (packing group).The causes of the fractures included road accident injury (12 cases),falling injury (8 cases) and the bruise injury caused by heavy object (6 cases).According to the Tile classification,there were 16 cases of type B and 10 cases of type C.There were 4 cases with open pelvic fractures and 5 associated with the abdomen trauma.There were 17 patients who had undergone angioembolization,including 10 men and 7 women,with an average age of 39.2 years (angio group).The causes included road accident injury (9 cases),falling injury (5 cases) and the bruise injury caused by heavy object (3 cases).There were 2 cases of type A,11 cases of type B and 4 cases of type C.The ISS,operation time,blood transfusion and the complication were all recorded respectively.Results For the packing group,the average ISS was 52.4± 15.3,and the operation time was 42.0±2.1 min.The blood transfusion was 15.0±4.7 U before the surgery and 6.0±1.6 U in the first 24 h after the surgery.The mean ICU stay was (8.0±3.6)d.And for the angio group,the average ISS was 40.6±12.4,and the operation time was 86.0±3.6 min.The blood transfusion before the surgery was 13.0±5.4 U vs.10.0±2.1 U in the first 24 h after the surgery,and the ICU stay was 11.0± 1.8 d.2 cases in the packing group underwent repacking and 6 cases in the angio group had received second angioembolization.Five cases died in the packing group but no one died of the hemorrhoea while 4 cases died in the angio group with one died of the hemorrhoea.There were 3 cases in the packing group suffering the deep infection while 1 suffered the superficial infection in the angio group.Conclusion The efficiency of the pelvic packing is higher than the angioembolization because of its shorter operation time and ICU stay,more effective blood control,less blood transfusion after surgery,and lower postoperative mortality.It is very suitable for the application at the local hospital and the national conditions nowadays.