中华核医学与分子影像杂志
中華覈醫學與分子影像雜誌
중화핵의학여분자영상잡지
Chinese Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
2013年
6期
426-429
,共4页
谭辉%韩磊%邬鹏跃%顾宇参%修雁%陈曙光%张一秋%傅毅鹏%石洪成
譚輝%韓磊%鄔鵬躍%顧宇參%脩雁%陳曙光%張一鞦%傅毅鵬%石洪成
담휘%한뢰%오붕약%고우삼%수안%진서광%장일추%부의붕%석홍성
乳腺肿瘤%放射性核素显像%乳房X线摄影术%诊断,鉴别
乳腺腫瘤%放射性覈素顯像%乳房X線攝影術%診斷,鑒彆
유선종류%방사성핵소현상%유방X선섭영술%진단,감별
Breast neoplasms%Radionuclide imaging%Mammography%Diagnosis,differential
目的 通过与钼靶成像进行比较,探讨乳腺专用伽玛显像(BSGI)仪诊断乳腺癌的临床价值.方法 56例拟行手术的乳腺肿块女性患者分别进行BSGI和钼靶成像,2次检查间隔不超过15 d.对照术后病理结果,分别计算2种显像方法诊断乳腺癌的灵敏度、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值,并采用配对x2检验比较检出率差异.结果 BSGI和钼靶成像诊断乳腺癌的灵敏度分别为92% (34/37)和76%(28/37),特异性分别为84%(16/19)和74% (14/19),准确性分别为89% (50/56)和75%(42/56),阳性预测值分别为92%(34/37)和85% (28/33),阴性预测值分别为84%(16/19)和61%(14/23),但两者诊断效能差异无统计学意义(X2=1.14,P>0.05).BSGI准确诊断出6例钼靶成像漏诊的乳腺癌,该6例患者的乳腺组织均呈致密型.结论 BSGI对于乳腺癌(尤其是乳腺组织呈致密型者)的诊断具有一定的临床应用价值,弥补了钼靶成像的不足.
目的 通過與鉬靶成像進行比較,探討乳腺專用伽瑪顯像(BSGI)儀診斷乳腺癌的臨床價值.方法 56例擬行手術的乳腺腫塊女性患者分彆進行BSGI和鉬靶成像,2次檢查間隔不超過15 d.對照術後病理結果,分彆計算2種顯像方法診斷乳腺癌的靈敏度、特異性、準確性、暘性預測值和陰性預測值,併採用配對x2檢驗比較檢齣率差異.結果 BSGI和鉬靶成像診斷乳腺癌的靈敏度分彆為92% (34/37)和76%(28/37),特異性分彆為84%(16/19)和74% (14/19),準確性分彆為89% (50/56)和75%(42/56),暘性預測值分彆為92%(34/37)和85% (28/33),陰性預測值分彆為84%(16/19)和61%(14/23),但兩者診斷效能差異無統計學意義(X2=1.14,P>0.05).BSGI準確診斷齣6例鉬靶成像漏診的乳腺癌,該6例患者的乳腺組織均呈緻密型.結論 BSGI對于乳腺癌(尤其是乳腺組織呈緻密型者)的診斷具有一定的臨床應用價值,瀰補瞭鉬靶成像的不足.
목적 통과여목파성상진행비교,탐토유선전용가마현상(BSGI)의진단유선암적림상개치.방법 56례의행수술적유선종괴녀성환자분별진행BSGI화목파성상,2차검사간격불초과15 d.대조술후병리결과,분별계산2충현상방법진단유선암적령민도、특이성、준학성、양성예측치화음성예측치,병채용배대x2검험비교검출솔차이.결과 BSGI화목파성상진단유선암적령민도분별위92% (34/37)화76%(28/37),특이성분별위84%(16/19)화74% (14/19),준학성분별위89% (50/56)화75%(42/56),양성예측치분별위92%(34/37)화85% (28/33),음성예측치분별위84%(16/19)화61%(14/23),단량자진단효능차이무통계학의의(X2=1.14,P>0.05).BSGI준학진단출6례목파성상루진적유선암,해6례환자적유선조직균정치밀형.결론 BSGI대우유선암(우기시유선조직정치밀형자)적진단구유일정적림상응용개치,미보료목파성상적불족.
Objective To compare the efficiency of breast specific gamma imaging (BSGI) and mammography for the diagnosis of breast carcinoma.Methods Fifty-six patients suspected of breast carcinoma underwent both BSGI and mammography within 15 d interval before surgery,and the diagnostic results were verified with histological examination.The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated.x2 test was applied for statistical analysis.Results The sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value,negative predictive value of BSGI and mammography were 92%(34/37) vs 76%(28/37),84%(16/19) vs 74%(14/19),89%(50/56) vs 75%(42/56),92%(34/37) vs 85%(28/33),84%(16/19) vs 61%(14/23),respectively,and there was no significant difference between the two methods (x2 =1.14,P>0.05).There were 6 breast carcinoma patients with dense breast tissue,and those malignant lesions were accurately identified with BSGI,but not with mammography.Conclusion BSGI is a useful adjunct imaging modality for the diagnosis of breast carcinoma,especially for the dense breast.