CAJ | 학술논문

目的分析台湾地区职业病名单的特点,与大陆《职业病目录》进行比较,为修订《职业病目录》提供参考.方法采用一般文献分析法和比较法,以两地职业病名单制度为中心,探讨大陆与台湾地区职业病名单的异同点.结果两地职业病名单在立法程序、地位与作用、分类方法等方面存在一致性,但在列举方式、法律依据、制定机构、分类及覆盖范围方面均有所不同.结论《职业病目录》修订应根据社会经济发展需求,结合社会保障能力,逐渐扩大职业病覆盖范围,以适应职业病防治工作的需求.
목적 분석태만지구직업병명단적특점,여대륙《직업병목록》진행비교,위수정《직업병목록》제공삼고.방법 채용일반문헌분석법화비교법,이량지직업병명단제도위중심,탐토대륙여태만지구직업병명단적이동점.결과 량지직업병명단재입법정서、지위여작용、분류방법등방면존재일치성,단재열거방식、법률의거、제정궤구、분류급복개범위방면균유소불동.결론 《직업병목록》수정응근거사회경제발전수구,결합사회보장능력,축점확대직업병복개범위,이괄응직업병방치공작적수구.
Objective To provide technical reference for the revision of the list of occupational diseases of China,the list of occupational diseases between the Taiwan district and the Mainland China have been analyzed and compared.Methods Focus on the system of occupational diseases list between the Taiwan district and the Mainland China,the literature analysis and comparative methods were commonly used,and to explore the similarities and differences of the list of occupational diseases between the mainland and Taiwan.Results The list of occupational diseases between the mainland and Taiwan shows uniformity in the legislative process,the status and role,classification,but exists difference in the enumeration mode,the legal basis of the development,the institutions to develop the list,classification and coverage et al.Conclusion To revise the National List of Occupational Diseases,the socio-economic development requirements should be based on,combined with social security capacity,gradually expand the coverage of occupational diseases,to adapt to the needs of the occupational disease prevention.