中华劳动卫生职业病杂志
中華勞動衛生職業病雜誌
중화노동위생직업병잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE AND OCCUPATIONAL DISEASES
2014年
4期
268-270
,共3页
张红升%张献兴%张矗%刘松%何剑锋
張紅升%張獻興%張矗%劉鬆%何劍鋒
장홍승%장헌흥%장촉%류송%하검봉
企业%职业病危害因素%监测
企業%職業病危害因素%鑑測
기업%직업병위해인소%감측
Specially supervised enterprise%Occupational hazards%Monitoring
目的 分析深圳市某区2011-2012年156家次重点监督企业职业危害因素监测结果,掌握该区重点监督企业职业危害因素变化情况,并提出对策.方法 收集该区2年156家次重点监督企业职业病危害因素监测资料,对不同年份、不同行业、不同种类职业病危害和不同规模企业的监测结果进行比较分析.结果 2011-2012年156家次重点监督企业共监测1 274点,点合格率为73.55％(937/1274),其中噪声监测点合格率最低;2012年总的监测点合格率(70.37％)低于2011年(80.94％),差异有统计学意义(x2=15.38,P＜0.01);电子行业2012年监测点合格率低于201 1年,差异有统计学意义(x2=11.27,P=0.001);不同行业的不同种类危害因素比较,噪声监测点合格率以电子和家具行业最低,有机溶剂监测点合格率以印刷行业最低,粉尘监测点合格率以家具行业最低.不同规模企业比较,大、中型企业2012年监测点合格率均低于2011年,小型企业2012年监测点合格率高于2011年,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.01,P＜0.05).结论 对重点监督企业的职业病危害防治工作应突出重点,特别要加强对印刷行业的有机溶剂、家具行业的粉尘和噪声的防治工作.
目的 分析深圳市某區2011-2012年156傢次重點鑑督企業職業危害因素鑑測結果,掌握該區重點鑑督企業職業危害因素變化情況,併提齣對策.方法 收集該區2年156傢次重點鑑督企業職業病危害因素鑑測資料,對不同年份、不同行業、不同種類職業病危害和不同規模企業的鑑測結果進行比較分析.結果 2011-2012年156傢次重點鑑督企業共鑑測1 274點,點閤格率為73.55％(937/1274),其中譟聲鑑測點閤格率最低;2012年總的鑑測點閤格率(70.37％)低于2011年(80.94％),差異有統計學意義(x2=15.38,P＜0.01);電子行業2012年鑑測點閤格率低于201 1年,差異有統計學意義(x2=11.27,P=0.001);不同行業的不同種類危害因素比較,譟聲鑑測點閤格率以電子和傢具行業最低,有機溶劑鑑測點閤格率以印刷行業最低,粉塵鑑測點閤格率以傢具行業最低.不同規模企業比較,大、中型企業2012年鑑測點閤格率均低于2011年,小型企業2012年鑑測點閤格率高于2011年,差異均有統計學意義(P＜0.01,P＜0.05).結論 對重點鑑督企業的職業病危害防治工作應突齣重點,特彆要加彊對印刷行業的有機溶劑、傢具行業的粉塵和譟聲的防治工作.
목적 분석심수시모구2011-2012년156가차중점감독기업직업위해인소감측결과,장악해구중점감독기업직업위해인소변화정황,병제출대책.방법 수집해구2년156가차중점감독기업직업병위해인소감측자료,대불동년빈、불동행업、불동충류직업병위해화불동규모기업적감측결과진행비교분석.결과 2011-2012년156가차중점감독기업공감측1 274점,점합격솔위73.55％(937/1274),기중조성감측점합격솔최저;2012년총적감측점합격솔(70.37％)저우2011년(80.94％),차이유통계학의의(x2=15.38,P＜0.01);전자행업2012년감측점합격솔저우201 1년,차이유통계학의의(x2=11.27,P=0.001);불동행업적불동충류위해인소비교,조성감측점합격솔이전자화가구행업최저,유궤용제감측점합격솔이인쇄행업최저,분진감측점합격솔이가구행업최저.불동규모기업비교,대、중형기업2012년감측점합격솔균저우2011년,소형기업2012년감측점합격솔고우2011년,차이균유통계학의의(P＜0.01,P＜0.05).결론 대중점감독기업적직업병위해방치공작응돌출중점,특별요가강대인쇄행업적유궤용제、가구행업적분진화조성적방치공작.
Objective To analyze the results of an occupational hazards survey of specially supervised enterprises (156 enterprise-times) during 2011-2012 in one district of Shenzhen,China and find out the changes in occupational hazards in these enterprises,and to put forward countermeasures for the prevention and control of occupational hazards.Methods Occupational hazards monitoring results for specially supervised enterprises (156 enterprise-times) during 2011-2012 were included.Comparison and analysis were performed between different years,different industries,different occupational hazards,and different sizes of enterprises.Results A total of 1274 monitoring sites from these specially supervised enterprises were included,of which qualification rate was 73.55％ (937/1274),and the noise monitoring sites showed the lowest qualification rate.The overall qualification rate in 2012 (70.37％) was significantly lower than that in 2011 (80.94％) (x2=15.38,P＜0.01).In electronics industry,the qualification rate in 2012 was significantly lower than that in 2011 (x2=11.27,P=0.001).Comparison of various hazards in different industries indicated that electronic enterprises and furniture enterprises had the lowest qualification rate in noise monitoring,printing enterprises had the lowest qualification rate in organic solvent monitoring,and furniture enterprises had the lowest qualification rate in dust monitoring.Comparison between different sizes of enterprises indicated that the qualification rate of large and medium enterprises in 2012 was significantly lower than that in 2011,while the qualification rate of small enterprises in 2012 was significantly higher than that in 2011 (P＜0.01 or P＜0.05).Conclusion In the prevention and control of occupational hazards in specially supervised enterprises,special attention should be paid to the control of organic solvents in printing enterprises and noise and dust in furniture enterprises.
