中华老年医学杂志
中華老年醫學雜誌
중화노년의학잡지
Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
2013年
10期
1123-1127
,共5页
沈敏学%胡明%杨芳%曾娜%彭真%孙振球%史静琤
瀋敏學%鬍明%楊芳%曾娜%彭真%孫振毬%史靜琤
침민학%호명%양방%증나%팽진%손진구%사정쟁
前列腺增生%医院,综合%医院,社区
前列腺增生%醫院,綜閤%醫院,社區
전렬선증생%의원,종합%의원,사구
Prostatic hyperplasia%Hospitals,general%Hospitals,community
目的 比较综合医院与社区医院医师对良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者诊治策略的差异,为诊治规范化提供科学依据. 方法 对我国各地城市综合和社区医院进行分层抽样,随机抽取了于2010年12月至2011年12月在门诊就诊的BPH患者进行调查,共收集127325份问卷,剔除不符合BPH诊断或年龄不合要求的问卷718份,得到有效问卷126607份,其中综合医院115909份,社区医院10698份,总有效率99.44%. 结果 患者平均年龄(67.8±8.6)岁,综合医院和社区医院BPH患者的IPSS评分、前列腺体积、尿流率和直肠指诊结果均不相同.除IPSS评分外,其他诊断方法的使用率在两类医院医师中均不相同,且地区差异大,其中华北地区综合医院的直肠指诊率高于社区医院,而超声与尿流率检查率低于社区;华东地区与华北完全相反;华南地区直肠指诊和尿流率检查应用率极低,而超声检查较高,且社区高于综合医院.药物治疗是BPH患者的首要治疗方法(97.53%),两类医院医生联合用药的比例差异有统计学意义但均接近75%.社区医院中,重度症状和体征患者等待观察的比例低于中度症状患者,但手术治疗比例未显著增加;而在综合医院中,重度症状和体征患者手术治疗的比例高于中度症状患者,但等待观察的比例却无降低. 结论 两类医院医师诊断方法的应用不同,且存在地区差异;治疗策略与症状或体征的严重程度相关,两类医院医师的用药策略接近.
目的 比較綜閤醫院與社區醫院醫師對良性前列腺增生(BPH)患者診治策略的差異,為診治規範化提供科學依據. 方法 對我國各地城市綜閤和社區醫院進行分層抽樣,隨機抽取瞭于2010年12月至2011年12月在門診就診的BPH患者進行調查,共收集127325份問捲,剔除不符閤BPH診斷或年齡不閤要求的問捲718份,得到有效問捲126607份,其中綜閤醫院115909份,社區醫院10698份,總有效率99.44%. 結果 患者平均年齡(67.8±8.6)歲,綜閤醫院和社區醫院BPH患者的IPSS評分、前列腺體積、尿流率和直腸指診結果均不相同.除IPSS評分外,其他診斷方法的使用率在兩類醫院醫師中均不相同,且地區差異大,其中華北地區綜閤醫院的直腸指診率高于社區醫院,而超聲與尿流率檢查率低于社區;華東地區與華北完全相反;華南地區直腸指診和尿流率檢查應用率極低,而超聲檢查較高,且社區高于綜閤醫院.藥物治療是BPH患者的首要治療方法(97.53%),兩類醫院醫生聯閤用藥的比例差異有統計學意義但均接近75%.社區醫院中,重度癥狀和體徵患者等待觀察的比例低于中度癥狀患者,但手術治療比例未顯著增加;而在綜閤醫院中,重度癥狀和體徵患者手術治療的比例高于中度癥狀患者,但等待觀察的比例卻無降低. 結論 兩類醫院醫師診斷方法的應用不同,且存在地區差異;治療策略與癥狀或體徵的嚴重程度相關,兩類醫院醫師的用藥策略接近.
목적 비교종합의원여사구의원의사대량성전렬선증생(BPH)환자진치책략적차이,위진치규범화제공과학의거. 방법 대아국각지성시종합화사구의원진행분층추양,수궤추취료우2010년12월지2011년12월재문진취진적BPH환자진행조사,공수집127325빈문권,척제불부합BPH진단혹년령불합요구적문권718빈,득도유효문권126607빈,기중종합의원115909빈,사구의원10698빈,총유효솔99.44%. 결과 환자평균년령(67.8±8.6)세,종합의원화사구의원BPH환자적IPSS평분、전렬선체적、뇨류솔화직장지진결과균불상동.제IPSS평분외,기타진단방법적사용솔재량류의원의사중균불상동,차지구차이대,기중화북지구종합의원적직장지진솔고우사구의원,이초성여뇨류솔검사솔저우사구;화동지구여화북완전상반;화남지구직장지진화뇨류솔검사응용솔겁저,이초성검사교고,차사구고우종합의원.약물치료시BPH환자적수요치료방법(97.53%),량류의원의생연합용약적비례차이유통계학의의단균접근75%.사구의원중,중도증상화체정환자등대관찰적비례저우중도증상환자,단수술치료비례미현저증가;이재종합의원중,중도증상화체정환자수술치료적비례고우중도증상환자,단등대관찰적비례각무강저. 결론 량류의원의사진단방법적응용불동,차존재지구차이;치료책략여증상혹체정적엄중정도상관,량류의원의사적용약책략접근.
Objective To comparing the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) between doctors in general hospitals and community hospitals,and to provide scientific clues for the standardization in medical practice.Methods General and community hospitals in urban China were selected via the stratified sampling.127,325 outpatients in these hospitals from December 2011 to December 2012 were randomly recruited.Results The average age of patients was(67.82±8.62) years.There were significant differences in I-PSS,prostate volume,urinary flow rate(UFR) and result of digital rectal examination(DRE) between patients in general and community hospitals.The rates of diagnostic applications were different between doctors in the two kinds of hospitals except I-PSS.Compared with community hospitals,DRE was more frequently applied while ultrasonic inspection and UFR test were less used in general hospitals in North China.A totally opposite situation was observed in East China as compared with the north.The application rates of DRE and UFR test were lower and ultrasonic inspection rate was higher in community hospitals than in general hospitals in South China.Pharmacotherapy was the most common treatment for BPH patients in both types of hospitals(97.53 %).The rates of drug combinations were statistically different but both were close to 75% in the two types of hospitals.In community hospitals,the percentage of patients receiving watchful waiting with severe symptoms and signs were lower than that of patients receiving watchful waiting with moderate symptoms and signs,but the percentage of patients receiving operation was not significantly increased.On the contrary,the percentage of patients receiving operation with severe symptoms and signs was higher than that of patients receiving operation with moderate symptoms and signs in general hospitals,but the percentage of patients receiving watchful waiting was not decreased.Conclusions Applications of diagnostic methods are significantly different between doctors in general hospitals and community hospitals and vary among regions.Therapeutic strategies are correlated with the severity of obstructive symptoms or signs.The medication strategy is similar between the two types of doctors.