CAJ | 학술논문

目的评价Pain Vision法评估分娩疼痛程度的可靠性.方法第一产程潜伏期足月产妇89例,年龄19～31岁,体重55 ～ 85 kg.同时采用PainVision法和视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估产妇分娩疼痛程度.Pain Vision法测量产妇感受的最小刺激电流量(电流知觉临界值)和与原有疼痛相对应的电流量(疼痛对应电流),根据其对电流刺激的反应程度转化为疼痛程度(PD).VAS评分与PD行直线相关分析.结果 VAS评分与PD无相关性,其相关系数为0.206(P＞0.05).结论 Pain Vision法不能客观地评估分娩疼痛的程度.
목적 평개Pain Vision법평고분면동통정도적가고성.방법 제일산정잠복기족월산부89례,년령19～31세,체중55 ～ 85 kg.동시채용PainVision법화시각모의평분법(VAS)평고산부분면동통정도.Pain Vision법측양산부감수적최소자격전류량(전류지각림계치)화여원유동통상대응적전류량(동통대응전류),근거기대전류자격적반응정도전화위동통정도(PD).VAS평분여PD행직선상관분석.결과 VAS평분여PD무상관성,기상관계수위0.206(P＞0.05).결론 Pain Vision법불능객관지평고분면동통적정도.
Objective To evaluate the reliability of Pain Vision method for assessment of labor pain.Methods Eighty-nine nulliparous parturients who were at full term and at the latent period of the first stage of labor,aged 19-31 yr,weighing 55-85 kg,were enrolled in this study.The degree of labor pain was assessed using Pain Vision method and VAS.Pain degree is calculated from two parameters,current perception threshold and pain compatible electrical current by using a somatosensory evoked potential stimulator.The former parameter was defined by the lowest electrical current detected; the latter parameter defined by the electrical current judged as being compatible with the intensity of ongoing pain.Linear correlation of VAS scores with pain degree was analyzed.Results There was no correlation between pain degree and VAS scores,and the correlation coefficient was 0.206 (P ＞ 0.05).Conclusion Pain Vision method can not be applied for objective assessment of labor pain.