中华内科杂志
中華內科雜誌
중화내과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
2013年
1期
21-25
,共5页
唐松涛%章秋%王长江%唐海沁%吴泰相
唐鬆濤%章鞦%王長江%唐海沁%吳泰相
당송도%장추%왕장강%당해심%오태상
糖尿病%诊断%血红蛋白A,糖基化%Meta分析
糖尿病%診斷%血紅蛋白A,糖基化%Meta分析
당뇨병%진단%혈홍단백A,당기화%Meta분석
Diabetes mellitus%Diagnosis%Hemoglobin A,glycosylated%Meta-analysis
目的 系统评价糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)≥6.5%在中国成人糖尿病诊断中的价值.方法 计算机检索国内外重要数据库,搜索有关HbA1c≥6.5%在中国成人中糖尿病诊断价值的文献.采用诊断性试验准确性质量评价工具(QUADAS)评价纳入文献质量,应用Meta-Disc1.4软件对纳入研究进行综合定量评价,并绘制综合ROC (SROC)曲线.结果 共纳入11篇文献.对于HbA1c≥6.5%在中国成人中的诊断价值为:合并敏感度为0.62(95%CI:0.60 ~0.64),合并特异度为0.96(95% CI:0.95~0.96),诊断性比值比(DOR)为40.25(95%CI:20.79~ 77.95),AUCSROC为0.7702(Sx=0.0636),Q=0.7103(Sx=0.0537).结论 HbA1c≥6.5%在中国成人糖尿病中的诊断特异度非常高,但敏感度相对较低,存在一定的漏诊率,需结合血糖检测以降低漏诊率.
目的 繫統評價糖化血紅蛋白(HbA1c)≥6.5%在中國成人糖尿病診斷中的價值.方法 計算機檢索國內外重要數據庫,搜索有關HbA1c≥6.5%在中國成人中糖尿病診斷價值的文獻.採用診斷性試驗準確性質量評價工具(QUADAS)評價納入文獻質量,應用Meta-Disc1.4軟件對納入研究進行綜閤定量評價,併繪製綜閤ROC (SROC)麯線.結果 共納入11篇文獻.對于HbA1c≥6.5%在中國成人中的診斷價值為:閤併敏感度為0.62(95%CI:0.60 ~0.64),閤併特異度為0.96(95% CI:0.95~0.96),診斷性比值比(DOR)為40.25(95%CI:20.79~ 77.95),AUCSROC為0.7702(Sx=0.0636),Q=0.7103(Sx=0.0537).結論 HbA1c≥6.5%在中國成人糖尿病中的診斷特異度非常高,但敏感度相對較低,存在一定的漏診率,需結閤血糖檢測以降低漏診率.
목적 계통평개당화혈홍단백(HbA1c)≥6.5%재중국성인당뇨병진단중적개치.방법 계산궤검색국내외중요수거고,수색유관HbA1c≥6.5%재중국성인중당뇨병진단개치적문헌.채용진단성시험준학성질량평개공구(QUADAS)평개납입문헌질량,응용Meta-Disc1.4연건대납입연구진행종합정량평개,병회제종합ROC (SROC)곡선.결과 공납입11편문헌.대우HbA1c≥6.5%재중국성인중적진단개치위:합병민감도위0.62(95%CI:0.60 ~0.64),합병특이도위0.96(95% CI:0.95~0.96),진단성비치비(DOR)위40.25(95%CI:20.79~ 77.95),AUCSROC위0.7702(Sx=0.0636),Q=0.7103(Sx=0.0537).결론 HbA1c≥6.5%재중국성인당뇨병중적진단특이도비상고,단민감도상대교저,존재일정적루진솔,수결합혈당검측이강저루진솔.
Objective To assess the diagnostic value of glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≥6.5% for diabetes in Chinese adults with oral glucose tolerance test(OGTT) as the reference standard.Methods Major databases were searched to get all diagnostic tests with HbA1c ≥ 6.5% for diabetes in Chinese adults.QUADAS items were used to evaluate the quality of the eligible studies.Meta-disc software was used to perform comprehensive quantitative assessment for all included studies and summary ROC (SROC) curve were drawn.Results A total of 11 studies were included.The outcomes of the diagnostic value with HbA1c ≥6.5% were as the following:pooled sensitivity 0.62 (95% CI:0.60-0.64),pooled specificity 0.96 (95% CI:0.95-0.96),diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) 40.25 (95% CI:20.79-77.95) and AUCSROC 0.7702 (sx =0.0636).Conclusions The diagnostic specificity is pretty high for the diagnostic test with HbA1c ≥6.5%,while sensitivity is low.Combination of HbA1c and glucose tests is needed to reduce the missed diagnosis rate.