中华内科杂志
中華內科雜誌
중화내과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
2013年
12期
1037-1040
,共4页
李牧蔚%赵香梅%饶立新%陈岩%朱中玉%高传玉
李牧蔚%趙香梅%饒立新%陳巖%硃中玉%高傳玉
리목위%조향매%요립신%진암%주중옥%고전옥
血管成形术,经腔,经皮冠状动脉%抗凝药
血管成形術,經腔,經皮冠狀動脈%抗凝藥
혈관성형술,경강,경피관상동맥%항응약
Angioplasty,transluminal,percutaneous coronary%Anticoagulants
目的 观察磺达肝癸钠联合替罗非班对择期行复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者手术的疗效及安全性.方法 389例不稳定性心绞痛(UA)择期行复杂PCI手术患者,术前分别皮下注射磺达肝癸钠(192例)或依诺肝素(197例),术后联合应用盐酸替罗非班,观察术后2、4周的出血、血栓及主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的发生率.结果 磺达肝癸钠与依诺肝素抗凝疗效相似,术后未见重度出血发生,轻度及微量出血发生率低(0比1.5%及18.2%比34.5%,P值=0.04和<0.001),术后2、4周MACE发生率差异无统计学意义(术后死亡、再发心肌梗死、顽固性心肌缺血、靶血管重建术发生率分别0.5%比0.5%、0.5%比1.0%、1.6%比1.0%、2.1%比1.5%;2周时0比0、1.0%比0.5%、1.0%比1.5%、0.5%比1.0%;4周时0.5%比0.5%、0.5%比0.5%、2.6%比2.0%、0比0.5%;P值均>0.05).结论 磺达肝癸钠联合替罗非班对择期行复杂PCI患者的疗效与依诺肝素联合替罗非班相当,不良事件发生率低,较安全.
目的 觀察磺達肝癸鈉聯閤替囉非班對擇期行複雜經皮冠狀動脈介入治療(PCI)患者手術的療效及安全性.方法 389例不穩定性心絞痛(UA)擇期行複雜PCI手術患者,術前分彆皮下註射磺達肝癸鈉(192例)或依諾肝素(197例),術後聯閤應用鹽痠替囉非班,觀察術後2、4週的齣血、血栓及主要不良心髒事件(MACE)的髮生率.結果 磺達肝癸鈉與依諾肝素抗凝療效相似,術後未見重度齣血髮生,輕度及微量齣血髮生率低(0比1.5%及18.2%比34.5%,P值=0.04和<0.001),術後2、4週MACE髮生率差異無統計學意義(術後死亡、再髮心肌梗死、頑固性心肌缺血、靶血管重建術髮生率分彆0.5%比0.5%、0.5%比1.0%、1.6%比1.0%、2.1%比1.5%;2週時0比0、1.0%比0.5%、1.0%比1.5%、0.5%比1.0%;4週時0.5%比0.5%、0.5%比0.5%、2.6%比2.0%、0比0.5%;P值均>0.05).結論 磺達肝癸鈉聯閤替囉非班對擇期行複雜PCI患者的療效與依諾肝素聯閤替囉非班相噹,不良事件髮生率低,較安全.
목적 관찰광체간계납연합체라비반대택기행복잡경피관상동맥개입치료(PCI)환자수술적료효급안전성.방법 389례불은정성심교통(UA)택기행복잡PCI수술환자,술전분별피하주사광체간계납(192례)혹의낙간소(197례),술후연합응용염산체라비반,관찰술후2、4주적출혈、혈전급주요불양심장사건(MACE)적발생솔.결과 광체간계납여의낙간소항응료효상사,술후미견중도출혈발생,경도급미량출혈발생솔저(0비1.5%급18.2%비34.5%,P치=0.04화<0.001),술후2、4주MACE발생솔차이무통계학의의(술후사망、재발심기경사、완고성심기결혈、파혈관중건술발생솔분별0.5%비0.5%、0.5%비1.0%、1.6%비1.0%、2.1%비1.5%;2주시0비0、1.0%비0.5%、1.0%비1.5%、0.5%비1.0%;4주시0.5%비0.5%、0.5%비0.5%、2.6%비2.0%、0비0.5%;P치균>0.05).결론 광체간계납연합체라비반대택기행복잡PCI환자적료효여의낙간소연합체라비반상당,불량사건발생솔저,교안전.
Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of fondaparinux combined with tirofiban in patients with high risk unstable angina (UA) undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods A total of 389 patients were enrolled and randomized into two groups receiving either fondaparinux with tirofiban or enoxaparin with tirofiban.Bleeding,thrombosis and main adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were compared between the two groups during hospitalization,at week 2 and week 4 after discharge.Results No severe bleeding was observed during hospitalization in the both groups,while lower rate of mild and minor bleeding was shown in the fondaparinux group (0 vs 1.5% and 18.2% vs 34.5%,P =0.04 and P <0.001 respectively).No difference was found between the two groups in the rate of MACE during hospitalization,at week 2 and week 4 weeks after discharge.The rates of death,recurrent myocardial infarction,refractory myocardial ischemia and target vessel revascularization were 0.5% vs 1.0%,0.5% vs 1.0%,1.6% vs 1.0% and 2.1% vs 1.5% during hospitalization;0 vs0,1.0% vs 0.5%,1.0% vs 1.5%,0.5% vs 1.0% at week2 after discharge; 0.5% vs0.5%,0.5% vs0.5%,2.6% vs 2.0%,0 vs 0.5% at week 4 after discharge (all P values > 0.05).Conclusion The combination therapy of fondaparinux and tirofiban is of good safety and efficacy in high risk UA patients undergoing complex PCI.