中国医药
中國醫藥
중국의약
CHINA MEDICINE
2014年
6期
852-854
,共3页
边步荣%李继周%赵瑛%孙波%刘波
邊步榮%李繼週%趙瑛%孫波%劉波
변보영%리계주%조영%손파%류파
腰硬联合麻醉%高龄患者%股骨头置换术
腰硬聯閤痳醉%高齡患者%股骨頭置換術
요경연합마취%고령환자%고골두치환술
Combined spinal anesthesia%Elderly patients%Hemiarthroplasty
目的 观察蛛网膜下腔麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉(腰硬联合麻醉)在高龄患者股骨头置换术中应用的安全性和有效性.方法 选择2009年1月至2013年1月于陕西省榆林市第一医院骨科择期行人工股骨头置换术80例患者,采用随机数字表法随机分为腰硬联合麻醉组和硬膜外麻醉组,各40例.分别评定2组患者麻醉效果,记录术侧感觉阻滞起效时间和局部麻醉药物使用剂量,观察记录麻醉后各时点的平均动脉压和心率.结果 腰硬联合麻醉组术侧感觉阻滞起效时间(45 ± 14)s明显短于硬膜外麻醉组[(261 ±57)s](P<0.05),腰硬联合麻醉组椎管内左旋布比卡因使用总剂量为(10 ± 4) mg,明显少于硬膜外麻醉组[(86±24)mg](P<0.05),腰硬联合麻醉组患者麻醉效果达到优的患者比例90.0%(36例)明显高于硬膜外麻醉组50.0%(20例)(P<0.05).结论 腰硬联合麻醉用于高龄患者人工股骨头置换术,起效迅速,镇痛完善,是一种较安全有效的麻醉方法.
目的 觀察蛛網膜下腔痳醉聯閤硬膜外痳醉(腰硬聯閤痳醉)在高齡患者股骨頭置換術中應用的安全性和有效性.方法 選擇2009年1月至2013年1月于陝西省榆林市第一醫院骨科擇期行人工股骨頭置換術80例患者,採用隨機數字錶法隨機分為腰硬聯閤痳醉組和硬膜外痳醉組,各40例.分彆評定2組患者痳醉效果,記錄術側感覺阻滯起效時間和跼部痳醉藥物使用劑量,觀察記錄痳醉後各時點的平均動脈壓和心率.結果 腰硬聯閤痳醉組術側感覺阻滯起效時間(45 ± 14)s明顯短于硬膜外痳醉組[(261 ±57)s](P<0.05),腰硬聯閤痳醉組椎管內左鏇佈比卡因使用總劑量為(10 ± 4) mg,明顯少于硬膜外痳醉組[(86±24)mg](P<0.05),腰硬聯閤痳醉組患者痳醉效果達到優的患者比例90.0%(36例)明顯高于硬膜外痳醉組50.0%(20例)(P<0.05).結論 腰硬聯閤痳醉用于高齡患者人工股骨頭置換術,起效迅速,鎮痛完善,是一種較安全有效的痳醉方法.
목적 관찰주망막하강마취연합경막외마취(요경연합마취)재고령환자고골두치환술중응용적안전성화유효성.방법 선택2009년1월지2013년1월우합서성유림시제일의원골과택기행인공고골두치환술80례환자,채용수궤수자표법수궤분위요경연합마취조화경막외마취조,각40례.분별평정2조환자마취효과,기록술측감각조체기효시간화국부마취약물사용제량,관찰기록마취후각시점적평균동맥압화심솔.결과 요경연합마취조술측감각조체기효시간(45 ± 14)s명현단우경막외마취조[(261 ±57)s](P<0.05),요경연합마취조추관내좌선포비잡인사용총제량위(10 ± 4) mg,명현소우경막외마취조[(86±24)mg](P<0.05),요경연합마취조환자마취효과체도우적환자비례90.0%(36례)명현고우경막외마취조50.0%(20례)(P<0.05).결론 요경연합마취용우고령환자인공고골두치환술,기효신속,진통완선,시일충교안전유효적마취방법.
Objective To observe the safety and effectiveness of combined spinal / epidural anesthesia (CSEA) in elderly patients undergoing femoral head replacement surgery.Methods Totally 80 patients who accepted femoral head replacement in Yan'an university school of medicine,second affiliated hospital orthopedic from January 2009 to January 2013.They were randomly divided into the CSEA group and epidural anesthesia group with 40 cases in each group.Anesthesia effect was evaluated in 2 groups.The initial acting time sensory block,local anesthesia drug dosage,mean arterial pressure and heart rate at each time point were recorded.Results The onset time of sensory block was significantly shorter in CSEA group (45 ± 14)s than in epidural anesthesia group (261 ± 57)s (P<0.05).Levobupivacaine dosage was significantly lower in CSEA group (10 ±4)mg than that in epidural anesthesia group (86 ± 24) mg (P < 0.05).Optimal anesthesia effect was achieved in 36 cases (90.0%) in CSEA group,significantly higher than that in anesthesia group(20 cases,50.0%) (P < 0.05).Conclusion CSEA is a safe and effective anesthesia method.