中华普通外科杂志
中華普通外科雜誌
중화보통외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF GENERAL SURGERY
2014年
6期
421-424
,共4页
华瑾%杜建军%王安辉%李纪鹏%赵青川%方诚%闫永平
華瑾%杜建軍%王安輝%李紀鵬%趙青川%方誠%閆永平
화근%두건군%왕안휘%리기붕%조청천%방성%염영평
胃肿瘤%腹腔镜%胃切除术
胃腫瘤%腹腔鏡%胃切除術
위종류%복강경%위절제술
Stomach neoplasms%Laparoscopy%Gastrectomy
目的 探讨进展期胃癌腹腔镜辅助D2根治术的安全性和可行性.方法 选择第四军医大学西京消化病医院2005年9月至2009年12月240例胃癌患者为研究对象,其中120例进展期胃癌接受腹腔镜辅助D2根治手术(腹腔镜组),120例进展期胃癌接受常规开腹D2根治手术(开腹组)为对照组,各组远端胃切除、全胃切除均分别为50例及70例.对患者的手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结切除数量、肿瘤切缘情况、手术并发症、5年肿瘤复发情况、5年无病生存率进行对比分析.结果 120例腹腔镜组患者中均无中转开腹,平均手术时间(307±84) min,明显长于开腹组的(203±52) min(t'=11.556,P<0.01);腹腔镜组术中出血量(258±78) ml,明显少于开腹组的(318±89) ml(=5.550,P<0.01);腹腔镜组获取淋巴结数(17±11)枚,开腹组获取淋巴结数(16±10)枚,两组间差异无统计学意义(t =0.723,P>0.05).腹腔镜组与开腹组所有切除标本切缘均阴性、无肿瘤细胞残留.腹腔镜组有9例患者发生手术相关并发症,发生率为7.5%,开腹组8例,发生率为6.7%,两组间差异无统计学意义(x2=0.252,P>0.05).腹腔镜组术后住院(10.6±4.7)d,明显少于开腹组的(14.3±2.9) d(t'=7.339,P<0.01).两组住院期间均无死亡发生.中位随访期47个月,腹腔镜组与开腹组的5年无病生存率分别是47.6%和42.8%(x2=0.577,P>0.05). 结论 腹腔镜辅助进展期胃癌根治手术是一种安全、可行的手术治疗方法.
目的 探討進展期胃癌腹腔鏡輔助D2根治術的安全性和可行性.方法 選擇第四軍醫大學西京消化病醫院2005年9月至2009年12月240例胃癌患者為研究對象,其中120例進展期胃癌接受腹腔鏡輔助D2根治手術(腹腔鏡組),120例進展期胃癌接受常規開腹D2根治手術(開腹組)為對照組,各組遠耑胃切除、全胃切除均分彆為50例及70例.對患者的手術時間、術中齣血量、淋巴結切除數量、腫瘤切緣情況、手術併髮癥、5年腫瘤複髮情況、5年無病生存率進行對比分析.結果 120例腹腔鏡組患者中均無中轉開腹,平均手術時間(307±84) min,明顯長于開腹組的(203±52) min(t'=11.556,P<0.01);腹腔鏡組術中齣血量(258±78) ml,明顯少于開腹組的(318±89) ml(=5.550,P<0.01);腹腔鏡組穫取淋巴結數(17±11)枚,開腹組穫取淋巴結數(16±10)枚,兩組間差異無統計學意義(t =0.723,P>0.05).腹腔鏡組與開腹組所有切除標本切緣均陰性、無腫瘤細胞殘留.腹腔鏡組有9例患者髮生手術相關併髮癥,髮生率為7.5%,開腹組8例,髮生率為6.7%,兩組間差異無統計學意義(x2=0.252,P>0.05).腹腔鏡組術後住院(10.6±4.7)d,明顯少于開腹組的(14.3±2.9) d(t'=7.339,P<0.01).兩組住院期間均無死亡髮生.中位隨訪期47箇月,腹腔鏡組與開腹組的5年無病生存率分彆是47.6%和42.8%(x2=0.577,P>0.05). 結論 腹腔鏡輔助進展期胃癌根治手術是一種安全、可行的手術治療方法.
목적 탐토진전기위암복강경보조D2근치술적안전성화가행성.방법 선택제사군의대학서경소화병의원2005년9월지2009년12월240례위암환자위연구대상,기중120례진전기위암접수복강경보조D2근치수술(복강경조),120례진전기위암접수상규개복D2근치수술(개복조)위대조조,각조원단위절제、전위절제균분별위50례급70례.대환자적수술시간、술중출혈량、림파결절제수량、종류절연정황、수술병발증、5년종류복발정황、5년무병생존솔진행대비분석.결과 120례복강경조환자중균무중전개복,평균수술시간(307±84) min,명현장우개복조적(203±52) min(t'=11.556,P<0.01);복강경조술중출혈량(258±78) ml,명현소우개복조적(318±89) ml(=5.550,P<0.01);복강경조획취림파결수(17±11)매,개복조획취림파결수(16±10)매,량조간차이무통계학의의(t =0.723,P>0.05).복강경조여개복조소유절제표본절연균음성、무종류세포잔류.복강경조유9례환자발생수술상관병발증,발생솔위7.5%,개복조8례,발생솔위6.7%,량조간차이무통계학의의(x2=0.252,P>0.05).복강경조술후주원(10.6±4.7)d,명현소우개복조적(14.3±2.9) d(t'=7.339,P<0.01).량조주원기간균무사망발생.중위수방기47개월,복강경조여개복조적5년무병생존솔분별시47.6%화42.8%(x2=0.577,P>0.05). 결론 복강경보조진전기위암근치수술시일충안전、가행적수술치료방법.
Objective This study was to compare surgical safety and oncologic adequacy of laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy (LAG) versus open gastrectomy (OG) for advanced gastric cancer.Methods 120 consecutive AGC patients undergoing LAG with D2 lymph node dissection between September 2005 to December 2009 were compared with 120 AGC patients undergoing OG during the same period.In each group,50 underwent distal gastrectomy,70 for total gastrectomy.Results There was no conversion to open surgery in LAG.The operative time was significantly longer in LAG than OG [(307 ± 84) min vs.(203 ± 52) min,t'=11.556,P < 0.01].The estimated blood loss was significantly less in LAG group than OG group [(258 ± 78) ml vs.(318 ± 89) ml,t =5.550,P < 0.01].The number of lymph nodes retrieved was(17 ±11) in LAG,(16 ±10)in OG (t =0.723,P>0.05).All margins were tumor free in both groups.9 patients had the postoperative complication in LAG,8 patients in OG (P > 0.05).Length of postoperative stay was significantly shorter in LAG than OG [(10.6 + 4.7) vs.(14.3 ± 2.9) days,t' =7.339,P <0.01].There was no mortality in both groups.The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate were comparable (47.6% in LAG vs.42.8% in OG,x2 =0.577,P > 0.05) between the two groups.Conclusions This study suggested that laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy is safe and feasible in terms of surgical outcome and oncologic adequacy for advanced gastric cancer.