CAJ | 학술논문

采用1∶1配对法获取试验组与对照组,将样本中正常者列为发展性研究组(242对),将边缘与轻度发育迟缓者列为征兆性研究组(156对),通过为期10个月的团体式和个案式干预,从考察Gesell测试的大运动、精细运动、适应能力、言语、个人-社交5个能区的发育商在组内、组间比较的差异显著性水平决断干预的有效性.无论是发展性干预组还是征兆性干预组,其试验组的发育商在大运动、精细运动、适应能力、言语、个人-社交5个能区方面均优于对照组水平也优于干预前的自我水平.
채용1∶1배대법획취시험조여대조조,장양본중정상자렬위발전성연구조(242대),장변연여경도발육지완자렬위정조성연구조(156대),통과위기10개월적단체식화개안식간예,종고찰Gesell측시적대운동、정세운동、괄응능력、언어、개인-사교5개능구적발육상재조내、조간비교적차이현저성수평결단간예적유효성.무론시발전성간예조환시정조성간예조,기시험조적발육상재대운동、정세운동、괄응능력、언어、개인-사교5개능구방면균우우대조조수평야우우간예전적자아수평.
The samples of experimental and control groups were obtained by 1 ∶ 1 matching method and divided into development (242 pairs) and sign (156 pairs) groups.Through a 10-month group and case type intervention,Gesell test was performed for 5 zone development quotients of large motor,fine motor,adaptability,speech and personal-social to determinate the effectiveness of interventions.Before intervention,t values of the development group were 1.07,1.42,0.78,0.62 and 1.67 while those of sign group-1.48,-1.96,1.82,1.78 and-1.73 respectively.The inter-group comparison of various developmental quotient differences had no statistical significance (P ＞ 0.05).After intervention,t values of the development group were 9.85,8.92,3.57,11.21 and 9.30 for inter-group comparison and-31.65,-36.94,-46.26,-37.56 and-49.85 for intra-group comparison.The results of sign group were 10.91,9.61,10.75,12.01 and 14.36 for inter-group comparison and-23.20,-31.75,-44.94,-33.58 and-54.58 for intra-group comparison.Between intra-group and inter-group,the comparison of the developmental quotient differences had statistical significance (P ＜ 0.01).In two experimental groups,the post-intervention developmental quotients in 5 zones are better than those pre-intervention levels.It shows that preventive intervention of infant mental health is effective.