CAJ | 학술논문

2012年1月至10月,对52例肱骨外上髁炎患者分别行富含血小板血浆(PRP;28例,PRP组)和糖皮质激素局部注射(24例,糖皮质激素组)治疗,对比两者的临床效果.注射治疗后1周时,两组间视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS)和Mayo医院改良肘关节评分差异有统计学意义；治疗后1个月和6个月时PRP组优于糖皮质激素组(P＜0.05).PRP痛点局部注射治疗肱骨外上髁炎临床效果良好,优于糖皮质激素治疗.
2012년1월지10월,대52례굉골외상과염환자분별행부함혈소판혈장(PRP;28례,PRP조)화당피질격소국부주사(24례,당피질격소조)치료,대비량자적림상효과.주사치료후1주시,량조간시각모의동통평분(VAS)화Mayo의원개량주관절평분차이유통계학의의；치료후1개월화6개월시PRP조우우당피질격소조(P＜0.05).PRP통점국부주사치료굉골외상과염림상효과량호,우우당피질격소치료.
A total of 52 patients with chronic lateral epicondylitis were randomly assigned into platelet-rich plasma (PRP) (n =28) or corticosteroid (n =24) group.The visual analog pain scale (VAS) and Mayo elbow score had no significant difference between two groups within 1 week post-treatment.However,VAS and Mayo elbow score improved more significantly in PRP group versus corticosteroid group at Month 1 and 6 post-treatment (P ＜ 0.05).The PRP trigger point injection treatment of elbow lateral epicondylitis achieved clinical outcomes and it was superior to glucocorticoid treatment.