中华神经外科杂志
中華神經外科雜誌
중화신경외과잡지
Chinese Journal of Neurosurgery
2013年
2期
129-133
,共5页
李欢%郝淑煜%马骏%侯宗刚%张莹%许非藩%刘佰运
李歡%郝淑煜%馬駿%侯宗剛%張瑩%許非藩%劉佰運
리환%학숙욱%마준%후종강%장형%허비번%류백운
弥漫性脑肿胀%去骨瓣减压术%外伤性脑损伤
瀰漫性腦腫脹%去骨瓣減壓術%外傷性腦損傷
미만성뇌종창%거골판감압술%외상성뇌손상
Diffuse brain swelling%Decompressive craniectomy%Traumatic brain injury
目的 探讨双额大骨瓣减压术对脑外伤后难治性弥漫性脑肿胀的治疗效果、手术时机与方式及并发症的防治.方法 回顾性分析重型颅脑损伤后难治性脑肿胀25例,其中双额大骨瓣减压组14例,保守治疗组11例.所有患者入院时行CT检查、颅内压监测、降颅压治疗.双额大骨瓣减压组入院后在不同时间内接受双额大骨瓣减压术,术后继续颅内压监测;保守治疗组一直采用保守治疗降低颅内压,持续性颅内压监测.在出院后6个月随访,进行GOS评分并统计双额大骨瓣减压术患者的并发症.结果 入院时双额去骨瓣减压组的GCS为(5.6±1.9)分;保守治疗组的GCS为(5.8±1.7)分.双额大骨瓣减压组入院时颅内压为(35.8±6.8) mmHg,从入院到手术平均时间为10.1 h(2-18 h),手术后明显降低为(17.6±5.7)mm Hg(P<0.05),保守治疗组入院时的颅内压为(33.2±5.6)mm Hg,入院后10.1h时颅内压降低为(30.2 ±4.9)mm Hg(P>0.05),与双额大骨瓣减压组术后颅内压相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).双额大骨瓣减压组术后并发症包括:硬膜下积液2例,术后脑积水1例.出院后6个月随访GOS评分:双额大瓣减压组预后较好有6例(GOS 4~5分),预后较差有8例(GOS 1~3分);保守治疗组预后较好有2例(GOS 4~5分),预后较差有9例(GOS 1 ~3分).结论 双额大骨瓣减压术对于脑外伤后难治性弥漫性脑肿胀是一种快速有效降低颅内压的方法,可改善患者预后.手术时机是影响预后的关键,术中减张严密缝合硬脑膜可减少术后并发症的发生.
目的 探討雙額大骨瓣減壓術對腦外傷後難治性瀰漫性腦腫脹的治療效果、手術時機與方式及併髮癥的防治.方法 迴顧性分析重型顱腦損傷後難治性腦腫脹25例,其中雙額大骨瓣減壓組14例,保守治療組11例.所有患者入院時行CT檢查、顱內壓鑑測、降顱壓治療.雙額大骨瓣減壓組入院後在不同時間內接受雙額大骨瓣減壓術,術後繼續顱內壓鑑測;保守治療組一直採用保守治療降低顱內壓,持續性顱內壓鑑測.在齣院後6箇月隨訪,進行GOS評分併統計雙額大骨瓣減壓術患者的併髮癥.結果 入院時雙額去骨瓣減壓組的GCS為(5.6±1.9)分;保守治療組的GCS為(5.8±1.7)分.雙額大骨瓣減壓組入院時顱內壓為(35.8±6.8) mmHg,從入院到手術平均時間為10.1 h(2-18 h),手術後明顯降低為(17.6±5.7)mm Hg(P<0.05),保守治療組入院時的顱內壓為(33.2±5.6)mm Hg,入院後10.1h時顱內壓降低為(30.2 ±4.9)mm Hg(P>0.05),與雙額大骨瓣減壓組術後顱內壓相比差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).雙額大骨瓣減壓組術後併髮癥包括:硬膜下積液2例,術後腦積水1例.齣院後6箇月隨訪GOS評分:雙額大瓣減壓組預後較好有6例(GOS 4~5分),預後較差有8例(GOS 1~3分);保守治療組預後較好有2例(GOS 4~5分),預後較差有9例(GOS 1 ~3分).結論 雙額大骨瓣減壓術對于腦外傷後難治性瀰漫性腦腫脹是一種快速有效降低顱內壓的方法,可改善患者預後.手術時機是影響預後的關鍵,術中減張嚴密縫閤硬腦膜可減少術後併髮癥的髮生.
목적 탐토쌍액대골판감압술대뇌외상후난치성미만성뇌종창적치료효과、수술시궤여방식급병발증적방치.방법 회고성분석중형로뇌손상후난치성뇌종창25례,기중쌍액대골판감압조14례,보수치료조11례.소유환자입원시행CT검사、로내압감측、강로압치료.쌍액대골판감압조입원후재불동시간내접수쌍액대골판감압술,술후계속로내압감측;보수치료조일직채용보수치료강저로내압,지속성로내압감측.재출원후6개월수방,진행GOS평분병통계쌍액대골판감압술환자적병발증.결과 입원시쌍액거골판감압조적GCS위(5.6±1.9)분;보수치료조적GCS위(5.8±1.7)분.쌍액대골판감압조입원시로내압위(35.8±6.8) mmHg,종입원도수술평균시간위10.1 h(2-18 h),수술후명현강저위(17.6±5.7)mm Hg(P<0.05),보수치료조입원시적로내압위(33.2±5.6)mm Hg,입원후10.1h시로내압강저위(30.2 ±4.9)mm Hg(P>0.05),여쌍액대골판감압조술후로내압상비차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).쌍액대골판감압조술후병발증포괄:경막하적액2례,술후뇌적수1례.출원후6개월수방GOS평분:쌍액대판감압조예후교호유6례(GOS 4~5분),예후교차유8례(GOS 1~3분);보수치료조예후교호유2례(GOS 4~5분),예후교차유9례(GOS 1 ~3분).결론 쌍액대골판감압술대우뇌외상후난치성미만성뇌종창시일충쾌속유효강저로내압적방법,가개선환자예후.수술시궤시영향예후적관건,술중감장엄밀봉합경뇌막가감소술후병발증적발생.
Objective To analyze the effects of bifrontal decompressive craniectomy on patients with refractory brain swelling after severe traumatic brain injuries.Methods We retrospectively reviewed 25 patients with refractory brain swelling after severe head injuries.Bifrontal decompressive craniectomy was carried out in 14 patients while the other 11 patients were nursed with non-operative treatments.All patients were managed by the intracranial pressure monitoring.The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) at the 6-months follow-up was used as the outcome measure.Results The admission ICP in the operative group was (35.8 ±6.8) mm Hg,which fell to (17.6 ±5.7) mm Hg after the operation.In the non-operative group,ICP fell from (33.2 ±5.6) mm Hg to (30.2 ±4.9) mm Hg 10.1 h after the admission.6 of the 14 patients in the operative group scored between 4 ~ 5 on the GOS compared with 2 of the 11 patients in the non-operative group.Conclusions Bifrontal decompressive craniectomy was a suitable measure to decrease the ICP in the patients with refractory brain swelling.If carried out early,it could provide better outcome for these patients.