中华实验外科杂志
中華實驗外科雜誌
중화실험외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SURGERY
2013年
11期
2444-2445
,共2页
皮国富%齐培一%刘宏建%孙建广%马胜利
皮國富%齊培一%劉宏建%孫建廣%馬勝利
피국부%제배일%류굉건%손건엄%마성리
腰椎退变%融合术
腰椎退變%融閤術
요추퇴변%융합술
Lumbar degeneration%Fusion
目的 观察比较腰椎融合(PLIF)与非融合(腰椎椎弓根螺钉加弹性棒)内固定术对邻近阶段退变的影响.方法 收集郑州大学第一附属医院2009年6月至2012年10月接受腰椎椎弓根螺钉加弹性棒内固定术(非融合组)和PLIF术(融合组)两种方法治疗腰椎退行性疾病患者30例.随访2~3年,给予复查磁共振成像(MRI)观察邻近阶段退变.结果 腰5/骶1阶段术前、术后Woodend评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);腰3/4阶段术前、术后12个月及24个月比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后36个月融合组(1.45 ±0.04)与非融合组(1.14 ±0.03)评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),且融合组术前与术后36个月评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 非融合术对腰椎各阶段活动影响较小,一定程度上减缓了邻近阶段发生退变的可能.
目的 觀察比較腰椎融閤(PLIF)與非融閤(腰椎椎弓根螺釘加彈性棒)內固定術對鄰近階段退變的影響.方法 收集鄭州大學第一附屬醫院2009年6月至2012年10月接受腰椎椎弓根螺釘加彈性棒內固定術(非融閤組)和PLIF術(融閤組)兩種方法治療腰椎退行性疾病患者30例.隨訪2~3年,給予複查磁共振成像(MRI)觀察鄰近階段退變.結果 腰5/骶1階段術前、術後Woodend評分比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05);腰3/4階段術前、術後12箇月及24箇月比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05),術後36箇月融閤組(1.45 ±0.04)與非融閤組(1.14 ±0.03)評分差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),且融閤組術前與術後36箇月評分差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論 非融閤術對腰椎各階段活動影響較小,一定程度上減緩瞭鄰近階段髮生退變的可能.
목적 관찰비교요추융합(PLIF)여비융합(요추추궁근라정가탄성봉)내고정술대린근계단퇴변적영향.방법 수집정주대학제일부속의원2009년6월지2012년10월접수요추추궁근라정가탄성봉내고정술(비융합조)화PLIF술(융합조)량충방법치료요추퇴행성질병환자30례.수방2~3년,급여복사자공진성상(MRI)관찰린근계단퇴변.결과 요5/저1계단술전、술후Woodend평분비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05);요3/4계단술전、술후12개월급24개월비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05),술후36개월융합조(1.45 ±0.04)여비융합조(1.14 ±0.03)평분차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),차융합조술전여술후36개월평분차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 비융합술대요추각계단활동영향교소,일정정도상감완료린근계단발생퇴변적가능.
Objective To compare the influence between fusion (PLIF) and non-fusion (lumbar pedicle screws combined with elastic rod fixation) for lumbar in adjacent stages of degeneration.Methods From June 2009 to October 2012,a total of 30 patients with lumbar degenerative disease were treated.The patients in fusion group were treated by PLIF (n =16),and those in non-fusion group were treated by lumbar pedicle screws combined with elastic rod fixation (n =14).During a follow-up period of 2 to 3 years,magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) re-examination was done to observe degeneration in adjacent stages.Results Woodend indexes (L5/S1) before and after surgery in fusion group and non-fusion group had no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) ; Woodend indexes (L3/L4) before,and 12 months and 24 months after surgery in fusion group and non-fusion group had no statistically significant difference (P >0.05),but there was significant difference between fusion group (1.45 ± 0.04) and non-fusion group (1.14 ± 0.03) 36 months after surgery (P < 0.05).At the same time,there was significant difference before and 36 months after operation in fusion group.Conclusion The surgery of non-fusion can less affect the lumbar activity in different stages,to a certain extent slowed down the degeneration of adjacent stages.