中华实验外科杂志
中華實驗外科雜誌
중화실험외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SURGERY
2014年
1期
54-56
,共3页
黄继超%姜德清%施乐华%郝占伟%柯群刚%余仔军
黃繼超%薑德清%施樂華%郝佔偉%柯群剛%餘仔軍
황계초%강덕청%시악화%학점위%가군강%여자군
胰十二指肠切除术%胰漏
胰十二指腸切除術%胰漏
이십이지장절제술%이루
Pancreaticoduodenectomy%Pancreatic fistula
目的 探讨交锁套入法胰肠吻合在胰十二指肠切除术(PD)的价值.方法 PD 143例分别采取常规套入法PD 75例,交锁套入法PD 68例,分析两种方法间的不同差异,探讨交锁套入法胰肠吻合预防胰漏的价值.结果 两种方法比较,胰肠吻合时间传统法为(35 ±8) min,交锁法为(30 ±5) min,胰肠吻合口测压传统法为(52±12) cmH2O(1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa),交锁法为(81±24) cmH2O,胰漏传统法为26.7%,交锁法为4.4%,胰漏引流量传统法为(175 ±125) ml,交锁法为(42±12) ml,胰漏愈合时间传统法为(19.6±16.4)d,交锁法为(9.1±1.9)d,腹腔感染传统法为12.0%,交锁法为7.4%,肺部感染传统法为9.3%,交锁法为8.8%,胸腔积液传统法为14.7%,交锁法为8.8%,住院时间传统法为(26.2±11.5)d,交锁法为(20.9±6.0)d,手术死亡率传统法为6.7%,交锁法为2.9%(P<0.05).结论 交锁套入法与传统法比较胰肠吻合时间缩短、胰肠吻合口耐受压升高明显、胰漏发生率明显降低、胰漏引流量减少、胰漏愈合时间缩短、并发症下降、住院时间缩短及手术死亡率明显降低.交锁法可预防胰漏.
目的 探討交鎖套入法胰腸吻閤在胰十二指腸切除術(PD)的價值.方法 PD 143例分彆採取常規套入法PD 75例,交鎖套入法PD 68例,分析兩種方法間的不同差異,探討交鎖套入法胰腸吻閤預防胰漏的價值.結果 兩種方法比較,胰腸吻閤時間傳統法為(35 ±8) min,交鎖法為(30 ±5) min,胰腸吻閤口測壓傳統法為(52±12) cmH2O(1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa),交鎖法為(81±24) cmH2O,胰漏傳統法為26.7%,交鎖法為4.4%,胰漏引流量傳統法為(175 ±125) ml,交鎖法為(42±12) ml,胰漏愈閤時間傳統法為(19.6±16.4)d,交鎖法為(9.1±1.9)d,腹腔感染傳統法為12.0%,交鎖法為7.4%,肺部感染傳統法為9.3%,交鎖法為8.8%,胸腔積液傳統法為14.7%,交鎖法為8.8%,住院時間傳統法為(26.2±11.5)d,交鎖法為(20.9±6.0)d,手術死亡率傳統法為6.7%,交鎖法為2.9%(P<0.05).結論 交鎖套入法與傳統法比較胰腸吻閤時間縮短、胰腸吻閤口耐受壓升高明顯、胰漏髮生率明顯降低、胰漏引流量減少、胰漏愈閤時間縮短、併髮癥下降、住院時間縮短及手術死亡率明顯降低.交鎖法可預防胰漏.
목적 탐토교쇄투입법이장문합재이십이지장절제술(PD)적개치.방법 PD 143례분별채취상규투입법PD 75례,교쇄투입법PD 68례,분석량충방법간적불동차이,탐토교쇄투입법이장문합예방이루적개치.결과 량충방법비교,이장문합시간전통법위(35 ±8) min,교쇄법위(30 ±5) min,이장문합구측압전통법위(52±12) cmH2O(1 cmH2O=0.098 kPa),교쇄법위(81±24) cmH2O,이루전통법위26.7%,교쇄법위4.4%,이루인류량전통법위(175 ±125) ml,교쇄법위(42±12) ml,이루유합시간전통법위(19.6±16.4)d,교쇄법위(9.1±1.9)d,복강감염전통법위12.0%,교쇄법위7.4%,폐부감염전통법위9.3%,교쇄법위8.8%,흉강적액전통법위14.7%,교쇄법위8.8%,주원시간전통법위(26.2±11.5)d,교쇄법위(20.9±6.0)d,수술사망솔전통법위6.7%,교쇄법위2.9%(P<0.05).결론 교쇄투입법여전통법비교이장문합시간축단、이장문합구내수압승고명현、이루발생솔명현강저、이루인류량감소、이루유합시간축단、병발증하강、주원시간축단급수술사망솔명현강저.교쇄법가예방이루.
Objective To investigate the clinical value of interlocking invaginated pancreaticoenterostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD).Methods The clinical data of 143 cases of pancreatic head cancer treated with PD were retrospectively analysed.Of these 143 patients,75 underwent conventional pancreaticoenterostomy,and 68 interlocking invaginated PD.The difference between the two procedures and the value of interlocking invaginated pancreaticoenterostomy to prevent pancreatic leakage were analyzed.Results In the conventional pancreaticoenterostomy and interlocking invaginated pancreaticoenterostomy,the operation time was (35 ± 8) min and (30 ± 5) min,the anastomotic pressure was (52 ±12) cmH2O (1 cmH2O =0.098 kPa) and (81 ± 24) cmH2O,the incidence of pancreatic fistula was 26.7% and 4.4%,the pancreatic fistula drainage was (175 ± 125) ml and (42 ± 12) ml,the pncreatic fistula healing time was (19.6 ± 16.4) days and (9.1 ± 1.9) days,the rate of abdominal infection was 12.0% and 7.4%,the incidence of lung infection was 9.3% and 8.8%,the rate of pleural effusion was 14.7% and 8.8%,the hospital stay was (26.2 ± 11.5) days and (20.9 ±6.0) days,and the operative morbidity rate was 6.7% and 2.9%,respectively (P < 0.05).Conclusion The operation time is shortened,the tolerance pressure of the stoma is increased significantly,the incidence of pancreatic leakage is reduced significantly,the pancreatic fistula drainage is decreased,and the pancreatic fistula healing time and hospitalil stay are shortened,and the rate of operative mortality and the occurrence of pancreatic leakage are significantly reduced in the interlocking invaginated pancreaticoenterostomy as compared with conventional pancreaticoenterostomy.