中华实验外科杂志
中華實驗外科雜誌
중화실험외과잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SURGERY
2014年
11期
2531-2533
,共3页
史福东%冯世庆%左金增%刘仕杰%张勇%刘田虹
史福東%馮世慶%左金增%劉仕傑%張勇%劉田虹
사복동%풍세경%좌금증%류사걸%장용%류전홍
关节镜%前交叉韧带%重建
關節鏡%前交扠韌帶%重建
관절경%전교차인대%중건
Arthroscopy%Anterior cruciate ligament%Reconstruction
目的 比较自体腓骨长肌腱和腘绳肌腱重建膝关节前交叉韧带的手术方法和临床效果.方法 (1)实验研究:将16例截肢标本的腓骨长肌腱双股、腘绳肌腱四股与前交叉韧带放入拉力试验机,测试极限拉伸强度、最大变形、刚度.(2)临床应用:单骨道单束重建60例前交叉韧带断裂患者,28例应用腓骨长肌腱,32例应用自体腘绳肌腱.应用Tegner评分表、Lysholm评分表和国际膝关节文献委员会膝关节评估表(I KDC)进行膝关节术前术后功能评估.结果 腓骨长肌腱双股、腘绳肌腱四股与前交叉韧带的极限拉伸强度分别为(4 268±285)、(4090±265)、(2020 ±264) N;最大变形分别为(9.87 ±2.56)、(12.27 ±2.78)、(15.90±3.52) mm;刚度分别为986、776、697 N/mm,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).两组术后1年Tegner评分A组术前为(2.68±1.02)分,术后为(6.32±0.92)分;B组术前为(2.73±0.91)分,术后为(6.13±1.04)分;Lysholm评分A组术前为(62.80±6.71)分,术后为(94.90 ±4.20)分;B组术前为(62.53±6.13)分,术后为(93.97±8.62)分;IKDC评分A组正常19例,接近正常8例,异常1例;B组正常20例,接近正常9例,异常2例,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 自体腓骨长肌腱单束和腘绳肌腱单束重建前交叉韧带均能取得优良的初期临床效果.
目的 比較自體腓骨長肌腱和腘繩肌腱重建膝關節前交扠韌帶的手術方法和臨床效果.方法 (1)實驗研究:將16例截肢標本的腓骨長肌腱雙股、腘繩肌腱四股與前交扠韌帶放入拉力試驗機,測試極限拉伸彊度、最大變形、剛度.(2)臨床應用:單骨道單束重建60例前交扠韌帶斷裂患者,28例應用腓骨長肌腱,32例應用自體腘繩肌腱.應用Tegner評分錶、Lysholm評分錶和國際膝關節文獻委員會膝關節評估錶(I KDC)進行膝關節術前術後功能評估.結果 腓骨長肌腱雙股、腘繩肌腱四股與前交扠韌帶的極限拉伸彊度分彆為(4 268±285)、(4090±265)、(2020 ±264) N;最大變形分彆為(9.87 ±2.56)、(12.27 ±2.78)、(15.90±3.52) mm;剛度分彆為986、776、697 N/mm,差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05).兩組術後1年Tegner評分A組術前為(2.68±1.02)分,術後為(6.32±0.92)分;B組術前為(2.73±0.91)分,術後為(6.13±1.04)分;Lysholm評分A組術前為(62.80±6.71)分,術後為(94.90 ±4.20)分;B組術前為(62.53±6.13)分,術後為(93.97±8.62)分;IKDC評分A組正常19例,接近正常8例,異常1例;B組正常20例,接近正常9例,異常2例,兩組比較差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 自體腓骨長肌腱單束和腘繩肌腱單束重建前交扠韌帶均能取得優良的初期臨床效果.
목적 비교자체비골장기건화객승기건중건슬관절전교차인대적수술방법화림상효과.방법 (1)실험연구:장16례절지표본적비골장기건쌍고、객승기건사고여전교차인대방입랍력시험궤,측시겁한랍신강도、최대변형、강도.(2)림상응용:단골도단속중건60례전교차인대단렬환자,28례응용비골장기건,32례응용자체객승기건.응용Tegner평분표、Lysholm평분표화국제슬관절문헌위원회슬관절평고표(I KDC)진행슬관절술전술후공능평고.결과 비골장기건쌍고、객승기건사고여전교차인대적겁한랍신강도분별위(4 268±285)、(4090±265)、(2020 ±264) N;최대변형분별위(9.87 ±2.56)、(12.27 ±2.78)、(15.90±3.52) mm;강도분별위986、776、697 N/mm,차이균무통계학의의(P>0.05).량조술후1년Tegner평분A조술전위(2.68±1.02)분,술후위(6.32±0.92)분;B조술전위(2.73±0.91)분,술후위(6.13±1.04)분;Lysholm평분A조술전위(62.80±6.71)분,술후위(94.90 ±4.20)분;B조술전위(62.53±6.13)분,술후위(93.97±8.62)분;IKDC평분A조정상19례,접근정상8례,이상1례;B조정상20례,접근정상9례,이상2례,량조비교차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 자체비골장기건단속화객승기건단속중건전교차인대균능취득우량적초기림상효과.
Objective To compare the surgical procedures and clinical outcomes of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using autograft peroneus longus tendon or hamstring tendon.Methods We compared the ultimate tensile strength,the maximum distortion,inflexibility of peroneus longus tendon,hamstring tendon and ACL.Autograft peroneus longus tendon was used in 28 cases,and autogenous hamstring tendon was used in 32 cases.Tegner score,Lysholm knee score and the the international knee documentation committee knee evaluation form (IKDC) were used to assess the knee function.Results The ultimate tensile strength are (4 268 ± 285),(4 090 ± 265),(2 020 ± 264) N; the maximum distortion are (9.87 ±2.56),(12.27 ±2.78),(15.90 ±3.52) mm; inflexibility of peroneus longus tendon are 986,776,697 N/mm.Hamstring tendon and ACL,Tegner score of group A,pre-operation 2.68 ± 1.02,post opeation 6.32 ± O.92 ; group B,pre-operation 2.73 ± 0.91,post opeation 6.13 ± 1.04 ; Lysholm score of group A,pre-operation 62.80 ± 6.71,post opeation 94.90 ± 4.20; group B,preoperation 62.53 ± 6.13,post opeation 93.97 ± 8.62 ; IKDC score of group A,19 cases are normal,8 cases are close to normal,1 case is abnormol; IKDC score of group B,20 cases are normal,9 cases are close to normal,2 cases are abnormol; have no significantly difference.Conclusion Reconstruction of ACL with single-bundle autologous peroneus longus tendon or hamstring tendon can both achieve excellent initial clinical results.