中华围产医学杂志
中華圍產醫學雜誌
중화위산의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE
2014年
2期
82-87
,共6页
原鹏波%赵扬玉%熊光武%魏瑗
原鵬波%趙颺玉%熊光武%魏瑗
원붕파%조양옥%웅광무%위원
双胎输血综合征%妊娠结局%胎儿镜检查%激光凝固术
雙胎輸血綜閤徵%妊娠結跼%胎兒鏡檢查%激光凝固術
쌍태수혈종합정%임신결국%태인경검사%격광응고술
Fetofetal transfusion%Pregnancy outcome%Fetoscopy%Laser coagulation
目的 探讨双胎输血综合征(twin-twin transfusion syndrome,TTTS)的治疗及其围产结局. 方法 2007年1月1日至2012年12月31日在北京大学第三医院住院的TTTS孕妇71例纳入研究.71例孕妇分别采取期待治疗、羊水减量、胎儿镜激光治疗或选择性减胎治疗.回顾性分析所有病例的分期、治疗方式与围产结局的关系.采用卡方检验、单因素方差分析及非参数检验比较不同分期及不同治疗方式患者的围产结局差异. 结果 采取期待治疗者25例,至少一胎存活>30 d的比例为32%(8/25),活产新生儿中脑损伤发生率为5/15.羊水减量治疗者16例,至少一胎存活>30 d的比例为4/16,活产新生儿中脑损伤发生率为3/15.接受胎儿镜激光凝固交通血管术治疗25例,至少一胎存活>30 d的比例为60%(15/25),高于期待治疗组及羊水减量组(x2=4.938,P=0.045; x2=5.056,P=0.043),活产新生儿中脑损伤发生率为7%(2/28),低于期待治疗组(x2=4.702,P=0.040),但与羊水减量组差异无统计学意义(x2=1.490,P=0.320).5例孕妇选择减胎治疗,1例行胎儿镜脐带结扎术减胎后分娩单活胎,4例行射频消融减胎后1例流产,另3例足月分娩.Ⅰ期患者妊娠结局最好,至少一胎存活>30 d的比例为12/18,明显高于Ⅲ、Ⅳ期患者(分别为4/1 7和6/18)(x2值分别为4.933和2.778,P值均<0.05).Ⅳ期患者至少一胎存活>30 d的比例仅是Ⅰ期患者的一半(6/18与1 2/1 8),活产新生儿中脑损伤发生率高达4/12,但与Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅲ期患者[分别为16%(4/25)、0/14和2/11]相比差异无统计学意义(x2-5.361,P=0.118). 结论 TTTS严重影响胎儿预后,早期诊断和处理可改善预后.胎儿镜下激光凝固交通血管术治疗TTTS可提高胎儿存活率,降低新生儿脑损伤发生率.
目的 探討雙胎輸血綜閤徵(twin-twin transfusion syndrome,TTTS)的治療及其圍產結跼. 方法 2007年1月1日至2012年12月31日在北京大學第三醫院住院的TTTS孕婦71例納入研究.71例孕婦分彆採取期待治療、羊水減量、胎兒鏡激光治療或選擇性減胎治療.迴顧性分析所有病例的分期、治療方式與圍產結跼的關繫.採用卡方檢驗、單因素方差分析及非參數檢驗比較不同分期及不同治療方式患者的圍產結跼差異. 結果 採取期待治療者25例,至少一胎存活>30 d的比例為32%(8/25),活產新生兒中腦損傷髮生率為5/15.羊水減量治療者16例,至少一胎存活>30 d的比例為4/16,活產新生兒中腦損傷髮生率為3/15.接受胎兒鏡激光凝固交通血管術治療25例,至少一胎存活>30 d的比例為60%(15/25),高于期待治療組及羊水減量組(x2=4.938,P=0.045; x2=5.056,P=0.043),活產新生兒中腦損傷髮生率為7%(2/28),低于期待治療組(x2=4.702,P=0.040),但與羊水減量組差異無統計學意義(x2=1.490,P=0.320).5例孕婦選擇減胎治療,1例行胎兒鏡臍帶結扎術減胎後分娩單活胎,4例行射頻消融減胎後1例流產,另3例足月分娩.Ⅰ期患者妊娠結跼最好,至少一胎存活>30 d的比例為12/18,明顯高于Ⅲ、Ⅳ期患者(分彆為4/1 7和6/18)(x2值分彆為4.933和2.778,P值均<0.05).Ⅳ期患者至少一胎存活>30 d的比例僅是Ⅰ期患者的一半(6/18與1 2/1 8),活產新生兒中腦損傷髮生率高達4/12,但與Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅲ期患者[分彆為16%(4/25)、0/14和2/11]相比差異無統計學意義(x2-5.361,P=0.118). 結論 TTTS嚴重影響胎兒預後,早期診斷和處理可改善預後.胎兒鏡下激光凝固交通血管術治療TTTS可提高胎兒存活率,降低新生兒腦損傷髮生率.
목적 탐토쌍태수혈종합정(twin-twin transfusion syndrome,TTTS)적치료급기위산결국. 방법 2007년1월1일지2012년12월31일재북경대학제삼의원주원적TTTS잉부71례납입연구.71례잉부분별채취기대치료、양수감량、태인경격광치료혹선택성감태치료.회고성분석소유병례적분기、치료방식여위산결국적관계.채용잡방검험、단인소방차분석급비삼수검험비교불동분기급불동치료방식환자적위산결국차이. 결과 채취기대치료자25례,지소일태존활>30 d적비례위32%(8/25),활산신생인중뇌손상발생솔위5/15.양수감량치료자16례,지소일태존활>30 d적비례위4/16,활산신생인중뇌손상발생솔위3/15.접수태인경격광응고교통혈관술치료25례,지소일태존활>30 d적비례위60%(15/25),고우기대치료조급양수감량조(x2=4.938,P=0.045; x2=5.056,P=0.043),활산신생인중뇌손상발생솔위7%(2/28),저우기대치료조(x2=4.702,P=0.040),단여양수감량조차이무통계학의의(x2=1.490,P=0.320).5례잉부선택감태치료,1례행태인경제대결찰술감태후분면단활태,4례행사빈소융감태후1례유산,령3례족월분면.Ⅰ기환자임신결국최호,지소일태존활>30 d적비례위12/18,명현고우Ⅲ、Ⅳ기환자(분별위4/1 7화6/18)(x2치분별위4.933화2.778,P치균<0.05).Ⅳ기환자지소일태존활>30 d적비례부시Ⅰ기환자적일반(6/18여1 2/1 8),활산신생인중뇌손상발생솔고체4/12,단여Ⅰ、Ⅱ화Ⅲ기환자[분별위16%(4/25)、0/14화2/11]상비차이무통계학의의(x2-5.361,P=0.118). 결론 TTTS엄중영향태인예후,조기진단화처리가개선예후.태인경하격광응고교통혈관술치료TTTS가제고태인존활솔,강저신생인뇌손상발생솔.
Objective To summarize the treatments and perinatal outcomes of patients with twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS).Methods Seventy one cases of TTTS hospitalized in Peking University Third Hospital from January 1,2007 to December 31,2012 were included into the study.They were treated with expectant therapy,amnioreduction,laser surgery or selective fetal reduction.The relationship between outcomes and different staging or treatment procedures of these cases were retrospectively analyzed,and the differences were compared by analysis of variances,Chi-square test and nonparametric test.Results Twenty-five cases received expectant treatment.The rate that at least one baby survived more than 30 days was 32% (8/25),and 5/15 of the live babies had neonatal brain injury.Sixteen cases received amnioreduction,of which the rate that at least one baby survived more than 30 days was 4/16,and 3/15 of the live babies had brain injury.Twenty-five cases received fetoscopic laser coagulation of vascular anastomoses.The rate that at least one baby survived more than 30 days was 60% (15/25),which was higher than that of the expectant group and amnioreduction group (x2=4.938,P=0.045 and x2=5.056,P=0.043) ; the brain injury rate among the live babies was 7% (2/28),which was lower than that of the expectant group (x2=4.702,P=0.040),but similar to the amnioreduction group (x2=1.490,P=0.320).Five patients received selective fetal reduction operation.Among which,one received fetoscopic cord ligation and delivered one healthy baby; the other four cases received radio frequency ablation,after which one was aborted and three delivered at full term.The rate that at least one baby survived more than 30 days was 12/18 in 18 cases with stage Ⅰ TTTS,which was better than that in stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ (4/17 and 6/18) (x2=4.933 and 2.778,both P<0.05).The rate that at least one baby survived more than 30 days in stage Ⅳ cases was only half of that in stage Ⅰ (6/18 vs 12/18),and the brain injury rate among the live babies was 4/12,similar to that in stage Ⅰ,Ⅱ and Ⅲ [16% (4/25),0/14 and 2/11,x2=5.361,P=0.118].Conclusion The prognosis of TTTS is very poor,early diagnosis and early treatment could improve the outcomes.Fetoscopic laser coagulation ensures a relatively higher survival rate and low brain injury rate for TTTS.