中华物理医学与康复杂志
中華物理醫學與康複雜誌
중화물리의학여강복잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION
2011年
11期
823-826
,共4页
尹义臣%张素平%王幕真%邓婉青%何锐%梁瑞华
尹義臣%張素平%王幕真%鄧婉青%何銳%樑瑞華
윤의신%장소평%왕막진%산완청%하예%량서화
脑梗死%失算症%EC301
腦梗死%失算癥%EC301
뇌경사%실산증%EC301
Cerebral infarction%Acalculia%EC301 test
目的 探讨左、右大脑半球脑梗死患者失算症的特点和机制.方法 选取56例脑梗死患者作为脑梗死组,其中左脑梗死34例(左脑梗死组),右脑梗死22例(右脑梗死组);另选取56例年龄及受教育年限均与脑梗死组相匹配的健康成人作为对照组.对脑梗死组和对照组进行EC301数字加工和计算量表的中文修订版(EC301-CR)检测,对所得数据进行统计分析.结果 脑梗死组EC301量表的各亚项评分均低于对照组,除视觉、听觉数点数2个亚项外,其余30个亚项评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).左脑梗死组的倒数、非数字序列、数字阅读、听写数字、数字转化(汉字阿拉伯数字相互转换)、心算(听觉、视觉)和笔算(加减乘除)、常识数字估计及常识数字大小判断等14项评分低于右脑梗死组(P<0.05).左脑梗死组失语症患者除数点数外各亚项评分均低于非失语症患者(P<0.05).结论 脑梗死患者可导致数字加工和失算症,左脑梗死患者较右侧脑梗死患者严重,合并失语症者失算症更严重.
目的 探討左、右大腦半毬腦梗死患者失算癥的特點和機製.方法 選取56例腦梗死患者作為腦梗死組,其中左腦梗死34例(左腦梗死組),右腦梗死22例(右腦梗死組);另選取56例年齡及受教育年限均與腦梗死組相匹配的健康成人作為對照組.對腦梗死組和對照組進行EC301數字加工和計算量錶的中文脩訂版(EC301-CR)檢測,對所得數據進行統計分析.結果 腦梗死組EC301量錶的各亞項評分均低于對照組,除視覺、聽覺數點數2箇亞項外,其餘30箇亞項評分差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).左腦梗死組的倒數、非數字序列、數字閱讀、聽寫數字、數字轉化(漢字阿拉伯數字相互轉換)、心算(聽覺、視覺)和筆算(加減乘除)、常識數字估計及常識數字大小判斷等14項評分低于右腦梗死組(P<0.05).左腦梗死組失語癥患者除數點數外各亞項評分均低于非失語癥患者(P<0.05).結論 腦梗死患者可導緻數字加工和失算癥,左腦梗死患者較右側腦梗死患者嚴重,閤併失語癥者失算癥更嚴重.
목적 탐토좌、우대뇌반구뇌경사환자실산증적특점화궤제.방법 선취56례뇌경사환자작위뇌경사조,기중좌뇌경사34례(좌뇌경사조),우뇌경사22례(우뇌경사조);령선취56례년령급수교육년한균여뇌경사조상필배적건강성인작위대조조.대뇌경사조화대조조진행EC301수자가공화계산량표적중문수정판(EC301-CR)검측,대소득수거진행통계분석.결과 뇌경사조EC301량표적각아항평분균저우대조조,제시각、은각수점수2개아항외,기여30개아항평분차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).좌뇌경사조적도수、비수자서렬、수자열독、은사수자、수자전화(한자아랍백수자상호전환)、심산(은각、시각)화필산(가감승제)、상식수자고계급상식수자대소판단등14항평분저우우뇌경사조(P<0.05).좌뇌경사조실어증환자제수점수외각아항평분균저우비실어증환자(P<0.05).결론 뇌경사환자가도치수자가공화실산증,좌뇌경사환자교우측뇌경사환자엄중,합병실어증자실산증경엄중.
Objective To investigate errors and the mechanism of acalculia in patients with left or right hemisphere cerebral infarction.Methods Fifty-six patients with single hemisphere cerebral infarction and 56 normal adults who were matched in age,sex and years of education were tested with EC301-CR.The patients were divided into a left hemisphere cerebral infarction group(n =34)and a right hemisphere cerebral infarction group(n =22).Results The scores on 30 out of 32 EC301-CR items were significantly lower among the patients than in the normal control group.Scores on 14 EC301-CR items were significantly lower in the left hemisphere group than in the right hemisphere group.In the left hemisphere group the item scores of aphasia patients were significantly lower than those of no-aphasia patients except on digit identity.Conclusion Mathematical processing and calculation were impaired in patients with single hemisphere cerebral infarction.Calculation was significantly worse among left hemisphere patients compared with right hemisphere cerebral infarction.There was a highly significant correlation between acalculia and aphasia.