中华胸心血管外科杂志
中華胸心血管外科雜誌
중화흉심혈관외과잡지
Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
2014年
4期
213-217
,共5页
金岩%王辉山%汪曾炜%李新民%尹宗涛%祝岩
金巖%王輝山%汪曾煒%李新民%尹宗濤%祝巖
금암%왕휘산%왕증위%리신민%윤종도%축암
心房颤动%瓣膜病%超声心动图%左心房内径
心房顫動%瓣膜病%超聲心動圖%左心房內徑
심방전동%판막병%초성심동도%좌심방내경
Atrial fibrillation%Valvular heart disease%Echocardiogram%Left atrial diameter
目的 分析风湿性二尖瓣狭窄(MS)和二尖瓣脱垂(MVP)手术后的心房颤动(房颤)变化特点.方法 2009年11月至2012年3月期间因MS或MVP而单纯行二尖瓣置换术或成形术的成年患者中,按术后6 min时心律分为窦性心律组和房颤组,再以年龄配对分为MS和MVP亚组,即风湿性心脏病窦性心律组(RS组)、二尖瓣脱垂窦性心律组(PS组)、风湿性心脏病房颤组(RAF组)和二尖瓣脱垂房颤组(PAF组),每组30例.各组之间比较采用独立样本t检验和x2检验,各组术前、术后比较采用配对t检验.结果 术后6 min时为窦性心律的MS患者术前有15例(50%)为房颤,术后1 min时有10例(33.3%)仍为房颤,而MVP患者术前、术后心律无明显变化;房颤组患者左心房内径(LAD)明显大于RS组,P<0.05,MS组与MVP组之间差异无统计学意义;RS组患者术前及术后1 min的LAD明显大于PS组,P为0.008和0.018,而术后6 min时RS组和PS组之间差异无统计学意义,P=0.558;风湿性心脏病(RHD)患者术前、术后1 min、6 min的二尖瓣瓣环侧壁处收缩期峰速(Smm)明显低于正常范围;PAF组患者Smm术前基本正常,而术后1 min和6 min时明显降低,与RHD患者相近.结论 房颤的发生、发展机制在MS与MVP两种患者中存在一定差异,伴有慢性房颤的部分MS患者术后随左心房缩小可转为并维持窦性心律;术后仍为持续性房颤的MVP患者其左心室收缩功能出现降低趋势.
目的 分析風濕性二尖瓣狹窄(MS)和二尖瓣脫垂(MVP)手術後的心房顫動(房顫)變化特點.方法 2009年11月至2012年3月期間因MS或MVP而單純行二尖瓣置換術或成形術的成年患者中,按術後6 min時心律分為竇性心律組和房顫組,再以年齡配對分為MS和MVP亞組,即風濕性心髒病竇性心律組(RS組)、二尖瓣脫垂竇性心律組(PS組)、風濕性心髒病房顫組(RAF組)和二尖瓣脫垂房顫組(PAF組),每組30例.各組之間比較採用獨立樣本t檢驗和x2檢驗,各組術前、術後比較採用配對t檢驗.結果 術後6 min時為竇性心律的MS患者術前有15例(50%)為房顫,術後1 min時有10例(33.3%)仍為房顫,而MVP患者術前、術後心律無明顯變化;房顫組患者左心房內徑(LAD)明顯大于RS組,P<0.05,MS組與MVP組之間差異無統計學意義;RS組患者術前及術後1 min的LAD明顯大于PS組,P為0.008和0.018,而術後6 min時RS組和PS組之間差異無統計學意義,P=0.558;風濕性心髒病(RHD)患者術前、術後1 min、6 min的二尖瓣瓣環側壁處收縮期峰速(Smm)明顯低于正常範圍;PAF組患者Smm術前基本正常,而術後1 min和6 min時明顯降低,與RHD患者相近.結論 房顫的髮生、髮展機製在MS與MVP兩種患者中存在一定差異,伴有慢性房顫的部分MS患者術後隨左心房縮小可轉為併維持竇性心律;術後仍為持續性房顫的MVP患者其左心室收縮功能齣現降低趨勢.
목적 분석풍습성이첨판협착(MS)화이첨판탈수(MVP)수술후적심방전동(방전)변화특점.방법 2009년11월지2012년3월기간인MS혹MVP이단순행이첨판치환술혹성형술적성년환자중,안술후6 min시심률분위두성심률조화방전조,재이년령배대분위MS화MVP아조,즉풍습성심장병두성심률조(RS조)、이첨판탈수두성심률조(PS조)、풍습성심장병방전조(RAF조)화이첨판탈수방전조(PAF조),매조30례.각조지간비교채용독립양본t검험화x2검험,각조술전、술후비교채용배대t검험.결과 술후6 min시위두성심률적MS환자술전유15례(50%)위방전,술후1 min시유10례(33.3%)잉위방전,이MVP환자술전、술후심률무명현변화;방전조환자좌심방내경(LAD)명현대우RS조,P<0.05,MS조여MVP조지간차이무통계학의의;RS조환자술전급술후1 min적LAD명현대우PS조,P위0.008화0.018,이술후6 min시RS조화PS조지간차이무통계학의의,P=0.558;풍습성심장병(RHD)환자술전、술후1 min、6 min적이첨판판배측벽처수축기봉속(Smm)명현저우정상범위;PAF조환자Smm술전기본정상,이술후1 min화6 min시명현강저,여RHD환자상근.결론 방전적발생、발전궤제재MS여MVP량충환자중존재일정차이,반유만성방전적부분MS환자술후수좌심방축소가전위병유지두성심률;술후잉위지속성방전적MVP환자기좌심실수축공능출현강저추세.
Objective Atrial structure remodeling is the important pathologic basis of generate and development in chronic atrial fibrillation(AF) of valvular heart disease.To analyze the changed feature of AF in rheumatic mitral valve stenosis (MS) and mitral valve prolapse(MVP) after mitral valve surgery,along with fundamental change of hemodynamics in left atrial.Methods Firstly,divided into sinus rhythm (SR) group and AF group according to cardiac rhythm postoperative 6 months,and then divided into MS and MVP two subgroups with age matched,namely rheumatic sinus rhythm group (RS group),MVP sinus rhythm group(PS group),rheumatic AF group(RAF group) and MVP AF group(PAF group),30 patients in each group.Independent sample t test andx2 test were used in comparison among groups,and matched t test in preoperative and postoperative comparison of each group.Results There are 15 (50%) AF patients before surgery and 10 (33.3%) AF patients postoperative 1 month in RS group.But cardiac rhythm of MVP patients has no significant change.Left atrial diameter(LAD) in AF group was larger than in SR group significantly preoperative and postoperative 1 month and 6 months(P < 0.05),and LAD have no significant difference between RAF and PAF group,P > 0.05 ; LAD in RS group preoperative and postoperative 1 month was larger than in PS group(P =0.008 and 0.018,respectively),but there is no significant difference between RS and PS groups postoperative 6 months(P =0.558).Systolic peak velocity(Smm) at valve ring with PWTDI were(6.0 ± 1.4) cm/s,(6.7 ± 1.8) cm/s and (6.2 ± 1.6) cm/s preoperative and postoperative 1 month and 6 months,lower than normal range obviously; Smm before surgery in PAF group was(9.3 ± 3.7)cm/s,but reduced obviously after surgery 1 month and 6 months and near the level of rheumatic patients.Conclusion Generate and development mechanism of AF in MS and MVP patients exist some extent difference,the rhythm of partial MS patients with chronic AF will turn to and maintain sinus rhythm along with LAD decreased,there is no this characteristic in MVP patients.