目的 探讨特发性视神经炎患者对比敏感度水平的变化规律.方法 病例对照研究.收集临床确诊的特发性视神经炎患者22例,经过不同时间的治疗视力恢复正常,神经系统MRI检查无异常.同时纳入24名健康人作为对照.采用OPTEC 6500型对比敏感度测试仪检测患眼5个空间频率的对比敏感度值,并进行统计学分析.组间相同频率间比较采用t检验或u检验,组内不同空间频率间比较采用方差分析或H检验,分析与年龄、病程和性别的关系时采用简单直线相关方法,并总结两组走行趋势.结果 特发性视神经炎组与埘照组远、近距离对比敏感度值最大均出现在6.0 c/d,分别为70.27±40.44、53.32±29.50及78.86±36.37、109.39±44.98.最小均出现在18.0 c/d,分别为8.27±6.11、12.09±8.57和15.67±9.02、22.22±14.56.视神经炎组在远、近距离的5个空间频率上的对比敏感度与对照组比较差异有统计学意义[空间频率从1.5至18.0 c/d,远距离t(u或t')值分别为4.19,5.59,3.06,2.50,3.13;P值分别为0.00,0.00,0.00,0.01,0.00.近距离t(u或t')值分别为3.54,3.98,2.72,3.20,3.39;P值分别为0.00,0.00,0.01,0.00,0.00],其水平与病程无关.两组内远、近距离不空间频率对比敏感度值比较,多数频率间的差异有统计学意义(视神经炎组远、近距离H值分别为52.38和64.96,对照组分别为64.77和60.53,P值皆<0.01).最大H值出现在视神经炎组的近距离.H值最大为64.96,出现在视神经炎组的近距离.特发性视神经炎组和对照组部分频率自身远、近距离对比敏感度值间的差异有统计学意义(空间频率南低到高,视神经炎组F值分别为6.36,0.03,2.52,1.53,2.90;P值分别为0.02,0.87,0.12,0.22,0.10.对照组F值分别为5.31,5.69,6.06,0.61,3.14;P值分别为0.03,0.02,0.02,0.44,0.08).结论 具有正常视力的视神经炎患者各频率对比敏感度值显著下降,对比敏感度可以作为评价特发性视神经炎后视觉质量的重要手段.
目的 探討特髮性視神經炎患者對比敏感度水平的變化規律.方法 病例對照研究.收集臨床確診的特髮性視神經炎患者22例,經過不同時間的治療視力恢複正常,神經繫統MRI檢查無異常.同時納入24名健康人作為對照.採用OPTEC 6500型對比敏感度測試儀檢測患眼5箇空間頻率的對比敏感度值,併進行統計學分析.組間相同頻率間比較採用t檢驗或u檢驗,組內不同空間頻率間比較採用方差分析或H檢驗,分析與年齡、病程和性彆的關繫時採用簡單直線相關方法,併總結兩組走行趨勢.結果 特髮性視神經炎組與塒照組遠、近距離對比敏感度值最大均齣現在6.0 c/d,分彆為70.27±40.44、53.32±29.50及78.86±36.37、109.39±44.98.最小均齣現在18.0 c/d,分彆為8.27±6.11、12.09±8.57和15.67±9.02、22.22±14.56.視神經炎組在遠、近距離的5箇空間頻率上的對比敏感度與對照組比較差異有統計學意義[空間頻率從1.5至18.0 c/d,遠距離t(u或t')值分彆為4.19,5.59,3.06,2.50,3.13;P值分彆為0.00,0.00,0.00,0.01,0.00.近距離t(u或t')值分彆為3.54,3.98,2.72,3.20,3.39;P值分彆為0.00,0.00,0.01,0.00,0.00],其水平與病程無關.兩組內遠、近距離不空間頻率對比敏感度值比較,多數頻率間的差異有統計學意義(視神經炎組遠、近距離H值分彆為52.38和64.96,對照組分彆為64.77和60.53,P值皆<0.01).最大H值齣現在視神經炎組的近距離.H值最大為64.96,齣現在視神經炎組的近距離.特髮性視神經炎組和對照組部分頻率自身遠、近距離對比敏感度值間的差異有統計學意義(空間頻率南低到高,視神經炎組F值分彆為6.36,0.03,2.52,1.53,2.90;P值分彆為0.02,0.87,0.12,0.22,0.10.對照組F值分彆為5.31,5.69,6.06,0.61,3.14;P值分彆為0.03,0.02,0.02,0.44,0.08).結論 具有正常視力的視神經炎患者各頻率對比敏感度值顯著下降,對比敏感度可以作為評價特髮性視神經炎後視覺質量的重要手段.
목적 탐토특발성시신경염환자대비민감도수평적변화규률.방법 병례대조연구.수집림상학진적특발성시신경염환자22례,경과불동시간적치료시력회복정상,신경계통MRI검사무이상.동시납입24명건강인작위대조.채용OPTEC 6500형대비민감도측시의검측환안5개공간빈솔적대비민감도치,병진행통계학분석.조간상동빈솔간비교채용t검험혹u검험,조내불동공간빈솔간비교채용방차분석혹H검험,분석여년령、병정화성별적관계시채용간단직선상관방법,병총결량조주행추세.결과 특발성시신경염조여시조조원、근거리대비민감도치최대균출현재6.0 c/d,분별위70.27±40.44、53.32±29.50급78.86±36.37、109.39±44.98.최소균출현재18.0 c/d,분별위8.27±6.11、12.09±8.57화15.67±9.02、22.22±14.56.시신경염조재원、근거리적5개공간빈솔상적대비민감도여대조조비교차이유통계학의의[공간빈솔종1.5지18.0 c/d,원거리t(u혹t')치분별위4.19,5.59,3.06,2.50,3.13;P치분별위0.00,0.00,0.00,0.01,0.00.근거리t(u혹t')치분별위3.54,3.98,2.72,3.20,3.39;P치분별위0.00,0.00,0.01,0.00,0.00],기수평여병정무관.량조내원、근거리불공간빈솔대비민감도치비교,다수빈솔간적차이유통계학의의(시신경염조원、근거리H치분별위52.38화64.96,대조조분별위64.77화60.53,P치개<0.01).최대H치출현재시신경염조적근거리.H치최대위64.96,출현재시신경염조적근거리.특발성시신경염조화대조조부분빈솔자신원、근거리대비민감도치간적차이유통계학의의(공간빈솔남저도고,시신경염조F치분별위6.36,0.03,2.52,1.53,2.90;P치분별위0.02,0.87,0.12,0.22,0.10.대조조F치분별위5.31,5.69,6.06,0.61,3.14;P치분별위0.03,0.02,0.02,0.44,0.08).결론 구유정상시력적시신경염환자각빈솔대비민감도치현저하강,대비민감도가이작위평개특발성시신경염후시각질량적중요수단.
Objective To explore the changes of contrast sensitivity (CS) in patients recovered from idiopathic optic neuritis (ION).Methods It was a case-control study.We screened 22 idiopathic optic neuritis patients who underwent treatment and obtained normal visual acuity.No nervous system abnormalities were found in MRI scan.Twenty four healthy individuals were enrolled as the control group.OPTEC 6500 contrast sensitivity tester was used to examine near- and far-distance CS values on 1.5,3.0,6.0,12 and 18 cycles/degree (c/d),separately.T-test or u-test was used to compare the mean of CS values between these two groups.ANOVA or H-test was adopted on CS values at the different frequencies in each group.Simple linear correlation was used to analyze the correlation between CS values and age,duration and gender,separately.Results The maximum CS values in both far- and near-distance appeared in 6.0 c/d in these two groups were 70.27±40.44,53.32±29.50,78.86±36.37 and 109.39±44.98,respectively.The minimum CS values in both far- and near-distance appeared in 18 c/d in these two groups were 8.27±6.11,12.09±8.57,15.67±9.02 and 22.22±14.56,respectively.Far- and near-distance CS values in ION group and control group had very significant differences at these five spatial frequencies (From 1.5 to 18.0 c/d,the test values on far-distance were 4.19,5.59,3.06,2.50,3.13,P values were 0.00,0.00,0.00,0.01,0.00.The test values on near-distance were 3.54,3.98,2.72,3.20,3.39,P values were 0.00,0.00,0.01,0.00,0.00).CS values had no relation to the duration of ION.Significant difference in CS values existed on most frequencies(In far- and near-distance,H values in ION group were 52.38 and 64.96,in control group were 64.77 and 60.53,P values were both less than 0.01).The maximum H value appeared on near-distance in ION group.The maximum H value was 64.96 of neardistance in ION group.Far- and near-distance CS values in ION group itself and control group itself had very significant differences at these 5 spatial frequencies (From low to high frequencies,F values were 6.36,0.03,2.52,1.53.2.90;P values were 0.02,0.87,0.12,0.22,0.10 in ION group.In control sroup,F values were 5.31,5.69,6.06,0.61,3.14;P values were 0.03,0.02,0.02,0.44,0.08 respectively).Conclusions CS values at different frequencies in ION patients with normal visual acuity descend significantly.Contrast sensitivity examination can be an important technique to evaluate vision quality in patients after ION.