中华眼科杂志
中華眼科雜誌
중화안과잡지
Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology
2014年
1期
27-31
,共5页
刘苏冰%孙红燕%聂晓丽%买志彬%马宁%辛宝莉%孙宏霞
劉囌冰%孫紅燕%聶曉麗%買誌彬%馬寧%辛寶莉%孫宏霞
류소빙%손홍연%섭효려%매지빈%마저%신보리%손굉하
角膜磨镶术,激光原位%激光,准分子%角膜波前像差%屈光,眼%近视
角膜磨鑲術,激光原位%激光,準分子%角膜波前像差%屈光,眼%近視
각막마양술,격광원위%격광,준분자%각막파전상차%굴광,안%근시
Keratomileusis,laser in situ%Lasers,excimer%Corneal wavefront aberration%Rrefraction,ocular%Myopia
目的 观察波阵面像差引导的非球面LASIK术后高阶像差的变化.方法 前瞻性研究.选取符合条件的患者120例(240只眼)分为3个组:波阵面像差引导的非球面LASIK组(A组);波阵面像差引导的LASIK组(B组);Q值引导的非球面LASIK组(C组),对手术前后A组的高阶像差进行研究,随访时间为术后1周及1、3、6个月.对3个组患者术后高阶像差进行比较,随访时间为术后6个月.手术前后数据的比较采用独立样本t检验;3个组之间的数据比较采用单因素方差分析,组间的多重比较进行Dunnet t检验.结果 A组总高阶像差术前及术后1周、1、3、6个月分别为(0.43±0.12)、(0.39±0.12)、(0.47±0.14)、(0.40±0.12)、(0.38±0.11) μm,术后各时间点与术前比较差异均无统计学意义(t=0.874,-1.145,0.652,0.496;P>0.05),但随着时间的延长,有变小的趋势;球差分别为(0.14±0.08)、(0.17±0.11)、(0.26±0.10)、(0.25±0.12)、(0.18±0.09) μm,术后1周和术前比较差异无统计学意义(t=-1.815,P=0.077),术后1、3、6个月时均大于术前(t=-4.410,-2.375,-1.870,P<0.05).术后6个月,术后A组、B组、C组总高阶像差分别为(0.38±0.11)、(0.61±0.13)、(0.46±0.15) μm,球差分别为(0.18±0.09)、(0.46±0.12)、(0.19±0.13) μm,高阶像差和球差3个组之间的比较,A组和C组明显低于B组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),A组和C组差异无统计学意义(P =0.866),但A组术后较术前变化小于C组;A组、B组、C组垂直彗差分别为(0.16±0.11)、(0.17±0.13)、(0.13±0.12) μm,水平彗差分别为(0.16±0.13)、(0.23±0.15) μm、(0.14±0.10)μm,3个组患者在垂直彗差和水平彗差方面比较差异均无统计学意义(F =0.367,0.254;P>0.05).结论 波阵面像差引导的非球面个体化LASIK与波阵面像差引导的LASIK相比能更好地减少术后高阶像差和球差的增加,且术后较术前变化小于Q值引导的非球面LASIK.
目的 觀察波陣麵像差引導的非毬麵LASIK術後高階像差的變化.方法 前瞻性研究.選取符閤條件的患者120例(240隻眼)分為3箇組:波陣麵像差引導的非毬麵LASIK組(A組);波陣麵像差引導的LASIK組(B組);Q值引導的非毬麵LASIK組(C組),對手術前後A組的高階像差進行研究,隨訪時間為術後1週及1、3、6箇月.對3箇組患者術後高階像差進行比較,隨訪時間為術後6箇月.手術前後數據的比較採用獨立樣本t檢驗;3箇組之間的數據比較採用單因素方差分析,組間的多重比較進行Dunnet t檢驗.結果 A組總高階像差術前及術後1週、1、3、6箇月分彆為(0.43±0.12)、(0.39±0.12)、(0.47±0.14)、(0.40±0.12)、(0.38±0.11) μm,術後各時間點與術前比較差異均無統計學意義(t=0.874,-1.145,0.652,0.496;P>0.05),但隨著時間的延長,有變小的趨勢;毬差分彆為(0.14±0.08)、(0.17±0.11)、(0.26±0.10)、(0.25±0.12)、(0.18±0.09) μm,術後1週和術前比較差異無統計學意義(t=-1.815,P=0.077),術後1、3、6箇月時均大于術前(t=-4.410,-2.375,-1.870,P<0.05).術後6箇月,術後A組、B組、C組總高階像差分彆為(0.38±0.11)、(0.61±0.13)、(0.46±0.15) μm,毬差分彆為(0.18±0.09)、(0.46±0.12)、(0.19±0.13) μm,高階像差和毬差3箇組之間的比較,A組和C組明顯低于B組,差異均有統計學意義(P<0.05),A組和C組差異無統計學意義(P =0.866),但A組術後較術前變化小于C組;A組、B組、C組垂直彗差分彆為(0.16±0.11)、(0.17±0.13)、(0.13±0.12) μm,水平彗差分彆為(0.16±0.13)、(0.23±0.15) μm、(0.14±0.10)μm,3箇組患者在垂直彗差和水平彗差方麵比較差異均無統計學意義(F =0.367,0.254;P>0.05).結論 波陣麵像差引導的非毬麵箇體化LASIK與波陣麵像差引導的LASIK相比能更好地減少術後高階像差和毬差的增加,且術後較術前變化小于Q值引導的非毬麵LASIK.
목적 관찰파진면상차인도적비구면LASIK술후고계상차적변화.방법 전첨성연구.선취부합조건적환자120례(240지안)분위3개조:파진면상차인도적비구면LASIK조(A조);파진면상차인도적LASIK조(B조);Q치인도적비구면LASIK조(C조),대수술전후A조적고계상차진행연구,수방시간위술후1주급1、3、6개월.대3개조환자술후고계상차진행비교,수방시간위술후6개월.수술전후수거적비교채용독립양본t검험;3개조지간적수거비교채용단인소방차분석,조간적다중비교진행Dunnet t검험.결과 A조총고계상차술전급술후1주、1、3、6개월분별위(0.43±0.12)、(0.39±0.12)、(0.47±0.14)、(0.40±0.12)、(0.38±0.11) μm,술후각시간점여술전비교차이균무통계학의의(t=0.874,-1.145,0.652,0.496;P>0.05),단수착시간적연장,유변소적추세;구차분별위(0.14±0.08)、(0.17±0.11)、(0.26±0.10)、(0.25±0.12)、(0.18±0.09) μm,술후1주화술전비교차이무통계학의의(t=-1.815,P=0.077),술후1、3、6개월시균대우술전(t=-4.410,-2.375,-1.870,P<0.05).술후6개월,술후A조、B조、C조총고계상차분별위(0.38±0.11)、(0.61±0.13)、(0.46±0.15) μm,구차분별위(0.18±0.09)、(0.46±0.12)、(0.19±0.13) μm,고계상차화구차3개조지간적비교,A조화C조명현저우B조,차이균유통계학의의(P<0.05),A조화C조차이무통계학의의(P =0.866),단A조술후교술전변화소우C조;A조、B조、C조수직혜차분별위(0.16±0.11)、(0.17±0.13)、(0.13±0.12) μm,수평혜차분별위(0.16±0.13)、(0.23±0.15) μm、(0.14±0.10)μm,3개조환자재수직혜차화수평혜차방면비교차이균무통계학의의(F =0.367,0.254;P>0.05).결론 파진면상차인도적비구면개체화LASIK여파진면상차인도적LASIK상비능경호지감소술후고계상차화구차적증가,차술후교술전변화소우Q치인도적비구면LASIK.
Objective To compare the higher order aberration of wavefront-guided aspherical versus wavefront-guided and Q-value guided aspheric personalized LASIK surgery in the treatment of myopia.Methods Prospective study.120 patients with myopia and/or astigmatism(240 eyes) were involved in our hospital from August 2010 to December 2010.There was a prospective study,divided into three groups:Wavefront-guided aspherical personalized LASIK in group A; Wavefront-guided LASIK in group B; Q-value guided aspheric LASIK in group C.The follow-up time was 6 months.The comparison of data before and after operation was two independent samples t test.The comparison among three groups was one-way analysis of variance,and multiple comparison between groups was Dunnet t test.Results A group:The differences between before and after surgery were not statistically significant in higher order aberration(t1 week =0.874,P1 week =0.387;t1 mouth =-1.145,P1 mouth =0.259;t3 mouth =0.652,P3 mouth =0.518; t6 mouth =0.496,P6 mouth =0.439),but as the extension of time,The values have a tendency to become smaller; the difference was notstatistically significant in spherical aberration between before and after surgery 1 week (t =-1.815,P =0.077),and was statistically significant between before and after surgery 1 month,3 months and 6 months after surgery (t1 month =-4.410,P1 mouth =0.000 ; t3 mouth =-2.375,P3 mouth =0.022 ; t6 mouth =-1.870,P6 month =0.000),the values after surgery were higher.The differences between before and after surgery were not statistically significant in coma aberration (t1 week =1.028,P1 week =0.310; t1 mouth =0.847,P1 mouth =0.402;t3 mouth =0.210,P3 mouth =0.984; t6 mouth =0.533,P6 mouth =0.597).At 6 months,the higher order aberration and spherical aberration in A group and C group were significantly lower than the B group,and the differences were statistically significant(PA&B =0.000; PC&B =0.000),the differences between A group and C group were not statistically significant in higher order aberration and spherical aberration (P =0.866),but A group is less than the C group in changes before and after surgery.The differences among three groups were not statistically significant in the vertical and horizontal coma(Frertical coma =0.367,Pvertical come =0.683;Fhorizontal coma =0.254,Phorizontal coma =0.797).Conclusion Wavefront-guided aspherical personalized LASIK compared with wavefront-guided personalized LASIK can better reduce the increases of the higher order aberration and spherical aberration,and the changes between preoperative and postoperative is less than Qvalue guided aspheric personalized LASIK.