中华医学杂志
中華醫學雜誌
중화의학잡지
National Medical Journal of China
2011年
29期
2030-2033
,共4页
梁旭东%曾浩霞%祝洪澜%冯岩岩%尹璐瑶%崔恒%魏丽惠
樑旭東%曾浩霞%祝洪瀾%馮巖巖%尹璐瑤%崔恆%魏麗惠
량욱동%증호하%축홍란%풍암암%윤로요%최항%위려혜
卵巢癌%抗肿瘤联合%抗药性
卵巢癌%抗腫瘤聯閤%抗藥性
란소암%항종류연합%항약성
Ovarian cancer%Chemotherapy%Resistance
目的 比较化疗敏感性不同的卵巢上皮癌的临床特征及预后差异,明确影响化疗耐药的临床因素.方法 参照2010版<NCCN指南>,根据初治后无瘤间期(DFI)将244例上皮性卵巢癌分为铂耐药、铂部分敏感、铂敏感3组,3组患者的发病年龄、病理类型构成、原发病灶大小、腹腔化疗及初始静脉化疗具体方案(泰素+卡铂或环磷酰胺+阿霉素+顺铂)差异无统计学意义.比较3组患者的一般情况、临床特征、治疗方案及预后生存差异.结果 244例卵巢上皮癌,铂耐药、铂部分敏感、铂敏感的比率分别为23.4%、13.5%、63.1%.晚期、未达满意肿瘤细胞减灭术的患者铂耐药概率增高(P<0.01).铂部分敏感组低分化比率高于铂敏感组(P<0.05).铂耐药组的CA125及淋巴转移率高于铂敏感组(P<0.05,P<0.01).3组患者的5年生存率分别为:9.5%、38.4%、81.9%,任意两组的总生存(OS)及无疾病进展生存(PFS)差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01).结论 肿瘤晚期、中低分化、CA125升高(超过1000×103U/L)、盆腔、腹主动脉旁淋巴结阳性、未达到满意的肿瘤细胞减灭,则耐药或部分敏感的概率高,预后差.临床因素对耐药性预测有参考价值,但不能准确定性.
目的 比較化療敏感性不同的卵巢上皮癌的臨床特徵及預後差異,明確影響化療耐藥的臨床因素.方法 參照2010版<NCCN指南>,根據初治後無瘤間期(DFI)將244例上皮性卵巢癌分為鉑耐藥、鉑部分敏感、鉑敏感3組,3組患者的髮病年齡、病理類型構成、原髮病竈大小、腹腔化療及初始靜脈化療具體方案(泰素+卡鉑或環燐酰胺+阿黴素+順鉑)差異無統計學意義.比較3組患者的一般情況、臨床特徵、治療方案及預後生存差異.結果 244例卵巢上皮癌,鉑耐藥、鉑部分敏感、鉑敏感的比率分彆為23.4%、13.5%、63.1%.晚期、未達滿意腫瘤細胞減滅術的患者鉑耐藥概率增高(P<0.01).鉑部分敏感組低分化比率高于鉑敏感組(P<0.05).鉑耐藥組的CA125及淋巴轉移率高于鉑敏感組(P<0.05,P<0.01).3組患者的5年生存率分彆為:9.5%、38.4%、81.9%,任意兩組的總生存(OS)及無疾病進展生存(PFS)差異均有統計學意義(均P<0.01).結論 腫瘤晚期、中低分化、CA125升高(超過1000×103U/L)、盆腔、腹主動脈徬淋巴結暘性、未達到滿意的腫瘤細胞減滅,則耐藥或部分敏感的概率高,預後差.臨床因素對耐藥性預測有參攷價值,但不能準確定性.
목적 비교화료민감성불동적란소상피암적림상특정급예후차이,명학영향화료내약적림상인소.방법 삼조2010판<NCCN지남>,근거초치후무류간기(DFI)장244례상피성란소암분위박내약、박부분민감、박민감3조,3조환자적발병년령、병리류형구성、원발병조대소、복강화료급초시정맥화료구체방안(태소+잡박혹배린선알+아매소+순박)차이무통계학의의.비교3조환자적일반정황、림상특정、치료방안급예후생존차이.결과 244례란소상피암,박내약、박부분민감、박민감적비솔분별위23.4%、13.5%、63.1%.만기、미체만의종류세포감멸술적환자박내약개솔증고(P<0.01).박부분민감조저분화비솔고우박민감조(P<0.05).박내약조적CA125급림파전이솔고우박민감조(P<0.05,P<0.01).3조환자적5년생존솔분별위:9.5%、38.4%、81.9%,임의량조적총생존(OS)급무질병진전생존(PFS)차이균유통계학의의(균P<0.01).결론 종류만기、중저분화、CA125승고(초과1000×103U/L)、분강、복주동맥방림파결양성、미체도만의적종류세포감멸,칙내약혹부분민감적개솔고,예후차.림상인소대내약성예측유삼고개치,단불능준학정성.
Objective To compare the clinical features and prognosis among patients with different chemosensitivity and determine the specific clinical influencing factors of chemotherapeutic resistance.Methods In references to the 2010 NCCN clinical practice guidelines on ovarian cancer and in accordance with the length of disease-free interval, 244 patients were divided into 3 groups: platinum-resistant, partially sensitive and platinum-sensitive. The differences of clinical features, treatment and prognosis were compared among these 3 groups. Results The resistant, partially sensitive, sensitive rates to platinum-based chemotherapy were 23.4%, 13.5% and 63. 1% respectively. Such factors as age, pathological type,primary tumor size. intraperitoneal chemotherapy and venous chemotherapy regimen had no effect on the responses to the combination platinum-based chemotherapy. The platinum-resistant percentage of advanced stage patients without optimal cytoreductive surgery was higher(P < 0. 01 ). The poorly differentiated rate of partially sensitive patients was higher than that of platinum-sensitive ones (P < 0. 05 ). The CA125 level and lymph node metastasis rate of platinum-resistant patients were higher than those of platinum-sensitive patients (P < 0. 05, P < 0. 01 ). The 5-year survival rates of resistant, partially sensitive and sensitive patients were 9.5%, 38.4% and 81.9% respectively. There were statistics differences in overall survival and progression-free survival among the 3 groups ( P < 0. 01 ). Conclusion Advanced ovarian cancer, poor differentiation, lymph node-positivity, CA125 rising above 1000 × 103 U/L and suboptimal cytoreductive surgery would lead to the occurrences of resistance or partially sensitivity. Clinical factors have some