国际医药卫生导报
國際醫藥衛生導報
국제의약위생도보
INTERNATIONAL MEDICINE & HEALTH GUIDANCE NEWS
2014年
19期
3031-3033
,共3页
罗函渝%于利%李丽新%杨杰
囉函渝%于利%李麗新%楊傑
라함투%우리%리려신%양걸
高危儿母亲%情绪%心理干预
高危兒母親%情緒%心理榦預
고위인모친%정서%심리간예
High-risk infants' mothers%Emotion%Psychological intervention
目的 探讨心理干预对高危儿母亲情绪及应对方式的影响.方法 将180例高危儿母亲随机分为干预组90例和对照组90例,干预组按照“高危儿母亲情绪管理方案”进行心理干预,对照组实施常规保健护理.利用焦虑自评量表(self-rating anxiety scale,SAS)和抑郁自评量表(self-rating depression scale,SDS)对高危儿母亲的情绪进行评估;采用自行设计的一般情况表及应对方式问卷调查高危儿母亲的一般情况、应对方式.结果 干预组在心理干预后SAS标准评分是(38.3±8.2)分,SDS标准评分是(42.5±7.4)分;对照组SAS标准评分是(41.7±9.8)分,SDS标准评分是(47.6±6.6)分;两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).干预组在干预后积极应对标准评分为(18.3±8.5)分,消极应对标准评分为(9.2±8.7)分;对照组积极应对标准评分为(13.8±9.4)分,消极应对标准评分为(12.9±8.4)分;两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 高危儿母亲经过心理干预后心理压力明显缓解,应对方式更为成熟,实施高危儿母亲情绪管理方案可促进母婴健康.
目的 探討心理榦預對高危兒母親情緒及應對方式的影響.方法 將180例高危兒母親隨機分為榦預組90例和對照組90例,榦預組按照“高危兒母親情緒管理方案”進行心理榦預,對照組實施常規保健護理.利用焦慮自評量錶(self-rating anxiety scale,SAS)和抑鬱自評量錶(self-rating depression scale,SDS)對高危兒母親的情緒進行評估;採用自行設計的一般情況錶及應對方式問捲調查高危兒母親的一般情況、應對方式.結果 榦預組在心理榦預後SAS標準評分是(38.3±8.2)分,SDS標準評分是(42.5±7.4)分;對照組SAS標準評分是(41.7±9.8)分,SDS標準評分是(47.6±6.6)分;兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).榦預組在榦預後積極應對標準評分為(18.3±8.5)分,消極應對標準評分為(9.2±8.7)分;對照組積極應對標準評分為(13.8±9.4)分,消極應對標準評分為(12.9±8.4)分;兩組比較差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).結論 高危兒母親經過心理榦預後心理壓力明顯緩解,應對方式更為成熟,實施高危兒母親情緒管理方案可促進母嬰健康.
목적 탐토심리간예대고위인모친정서급응대방식적영향.방법 장180례고위인모친수궤분위간예조90례화대조조90례,간예조안조“고위인모친정서관리방안”진행심리간예,대조조실시상규보건호리.이용초필자평량표(self-rating anxiety scale,SAS)화억욱자평량표(self-rating depression scale,SDS)대고위인모친적정서진행평고;채용자행설계적일반정황표급응대방식문권조사고위인모친적일반정황、응대방식.결과 간예조재심리간예후SAS표준평분시(38.3±8.2)분,SDS표준평분시(42.5±7.4)분;대조조SAS표준평분시(41.7±9.8)분,SDS표준평분시(47.6±6.6)분;량조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).간예조재간예후적겁응대표준평분위(18.3±8.5)분,소겁응대표준평분위(9.2±8.7)분;대조조적겁응대표준평분위(13.8±9.4)분,소겁응대표준평분위(12.9±8.4)분;량조비교차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).결론 고위인모친경과심리간예후심리압력명현완해,응대방식경위성숙,실시고위인모친정서관리방안가촉진모영건강.
Objective To explore the effect of psychological intervention on mood and coping style of high-risk infants' mothers.Methods 180 high-risk infants' mothers were randomly divided into intervention group and control group,90 cases in each group.Intervention group carried out psychological intervention in accordance with High-risk Infants' Mothers' Emotional Management Scheme,while control group received routine care.Evaluated high-risk infants' mothers' mood with self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS); investigated high-risk infants' mothers' general situation,coping style with selfdesigned general situation table and coping style questionnaire.Results SAS standard score was (38.3 ± 8.2),SDS standard score was (42.5 ± 7.4) in intervention group after psychological intervention; those in control group were (41.7 ± 9.8) and (47.6 ± 6.6); with statistically significant differences between two groups (P < 0.05).Positive coping style standard score was (18.3 ± 8.5),negative coping style standard score was (9.2 ± 8.7) in intervention group after psychological intervention; those in control group were (13.8 ± 9.4) and (12.9 ± 8.4); with statistically significant differences between two groups (P < 0.05).Conclusions Psychological intervention can obviously alleviate psychological pressure of high-risk infants' mothers,with maturer coping style.The implementation of high-risk infants' mothers' mood management solution can promote matemal and child health.