中华医学科研管理杂志
中華醫學科研管理雜誌
중화의학과연관리잡지
ZHONGHUA YIXUE KEYAN GUANLI ZAZHI CHINESE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH MANAGEMENT
2013年
5期
303-308
,共6页
王媛媛%孙瑞华%樊凡%姚丽波%李文杰
王媛媛%孫瑞華%樊凡%姚麗波%李文傑
왕원원%손서화%번범%요려파%리문걸
绩效评估%指标体系%德尔菲法%层次分析法%指数标度
績效評估%指標體繫%德爾菲法%層次分析法%指數標度
적효평고%지표체계%덕이비법%층차분석법%지수표도
performance evaluation%index system%Delphi method%Analytic hierarchy process(AHP)%exponential scale
目的 建立医院自主科研课题结题绩效评估的指标体系.方法 采用德尔菲法(Delphi法)进行两轮问卷调查,得到专家对每一个指标的重要性评分,提高专家意见的收敛度.采用基于指数标度层次分析法计算各个指标的权重系数.结果 两轮调查专家积极性高,且权威系数分别为0.859和0.833,研究结果可靠.两轮调查总体指标的协调系数分别为0.254和0.553,显著性检验,p值均小于0.05,专家意见协调性较好.根据各指标重要性得分,通过层次分析法确定指标权重系数,得到由3个一级指标和10个二级指标组成的指标体系.结论 本研究建立的医院自主科研课题结题绩效评估指标体系,对医院自主科研课题结题绩效评估工作具有实际应用价值,对医院科研管理水平的提高具有现实意义.
目的 建立醫院自主科研課題結題績效評估的指標體繫.方法 採用德爾菲法(Delphi法)進行兩輪問捲調查,得到專傢對每一箇指標的重要性評分,提高專傢意見的收斂度.採用基于指數標度層次分析法計算各箇指標的權重繫數.結果 兩輪調查專傢積極性高,且權威繫數分彆為0.859和0.833,研究結果可靠.兩輪調查總體指標的協調繫數分彆為0.254和0.553,顯著性檢驗,p值均小于0.05,專傢意見協調性較好.根據各指標重要性得分,通過層次分析法確定指標權重繫數,得到由3箇一級指標和10箇二級指標組成的指標體繫.結論 本研究建立的醫院自主科研課題結題績效評估指標體繫,對醫院自主科研課題結題績效評估工作具有實際應用價值,對醫院科研管理水平的提高具有現實意義.
목적 건립의원자주과연과제결제적효평고적지표체계.방법 채용덕이비법(Delphi법)진행량륜문권조사,득도전가대매일개지표적중요성평분,제고전가의견적수렴도.채용기우지수표도층차분석법계산각개지표적권중계수.결과 량륜조사전가적겁성고,차권위계수분별위0.859화0.833,연구결과가고.량륜조사총체지표적협조계수분별위0.254화0.553,현저성검험,p치균소우0.05,전가의견협조성교호.근거각지표중요성득분,통과층차분석법학정지표권중계수,득도유3개일급지표화10개이급지표조성적지표체계.결론 본연구건립적의원자주과연과제결제적효평고지표체계,대의원자주과연과제결제적효평고공작구유실제응용개치,대의원과연관리수평적제고구유현실의의.
Objective To structure a preliminary indicators system for evaluating the projects of Hospital in finished phase.Methods With Delphi method,collect the experts' opinion of the importance of every item.With AHP (Analytic hierarchy process) method,calculate the weight coefficient of every item.Results The positivity of the experts was fine; The authority coefficient of two rounds were 0.859 and 0.833,the consultation results are reliable; The coordination coefficient of two rounds were 0.254 and 0.553,according to the significance test,p values were less than 0.05,indicating that the results were desirable.According to the score of every item,we got the weight index of every items based on the AHP method.Finally we structure the indicators system including 3 primary indicators and 10 secondary indicators.Conclusion The preliminary results of this study provide a reference for the performance evaluation of projects in finished phase of China-Japan Friendship Hospital.