中华肿瘤杂志
中華腫瘤雜誌
중화종류잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY
2012年
11期
873-876
,共4页
务森%陈明耀%雒建超%魏立%陈重
務森%陳明耀%雒建超%魏立%陳重
무삼%진명요%락건초%위립%진중
食管肿瘤%新辅助疗法%外科手术%治疗结果
食管腫瘤%新輔助療法%外科手術%治療結果
식관종류%신보조요법%외과수술%치료결과
Esophageal neoplasms%Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy%Surgical procedures,operative%Treatment outcome
目的 比较局部进展期食管鳞癌不同新辅助放化疗方案的近期疗效.方法 随机将154例局部进展期食管鳞癌患者分为实验组(多西他赛+顺铂化疗)和对照组(顺铂+氟尿嘧啶化疗),进行2个周期的化疗和40 Gy的纵隔放疗,3~4周后手术治疗.以同期直接手术的237例食管鳞癌患者(单纯手术组)为参照,比较近期疗效.结果 全部患者均完成新辅助放化疗,其中9例因肿瘤进展放弃手术治疗.实验组和对照组总的3~4级不良反应发生率分别为53.2%和36.4% (x2=4.44,P=0.035),其中粒细胞减少的发生率分别为20.7%和5.2% (x2=8.28,P=0.004).实验组手术切除率为92.2% (71/77),完全性切除率为89.6%(69/77);对照组手术切除率为90.9%(70/77),完全性切除率为85.7%(66/77);实验组和对照组的手术切除率和完全性切除率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P =0.77,P=0.46).实验组和对照组的并发症发生率分别为21.9%(16/73)和23.6%(17/72),差异无统计学意义(x2 =0.059,P=0.81).实验组和对照组新辅助放化疗后的病理完全缓解(pCR)率分别35.1%(27/77)和20.8% (16/77),差异有统计学意义(x2=3.90,P=0.048).结论 与传统的顺铂+氟尿嘧啶方案比较,多西他赛+顺铂方案联合常规分割放疗可以获得更高的pCR.
目的 比較跼部進展期食管鱗癌不同新輔助放化療方案的近期療效.方法 隨機將154例跼部進展期食管鱗癌患者分為實驗組(多西他賽+順鉑化療)和對照組(順鉑+氟尿嘧啶化療),進行2箇週期的化療和40 Gy的縱隔放療,3~4週後手術治療.以同期直接手術的237例食管鱗癌患者(單純手術組)為參照,比較近期療效.結果 全部患者均完成新輔助放化療,其中9例因腫瘤進展放棄手術治療.實驗組和對照組總的3~4級不良反應髮生率分彆為53.2%和36.4% (x2=4.44,P=0.035),其中粒細胞減少的髮生率分彆為20.7%和5.2% (x2=8.28,P=0.004).實驗組手術切除率為92.2% (71/77),完全性切除率為89.6%(69/77);對照組手術切除率為90.9%(70/77),完全性切除率為85.7%(66/77);實驗組和對照組的手術切除率和完全性切除率比較,差異均無統計學意義(P =0.77,P=0.46).實驗組和對照組的併髮癥髮生率分彆為21.9%(16/73)和23.6%(17/72),差異無統計學意義(x2 =0.059,P=0.81).實驗組和對照組新輔助放化療後的病理完全緩解(pCR)率分彆35.1%(27/77)和20.8% (16/77),差異有統計學意義(x2=3.90,P=0.048).結論 與傳統的順鉑+氟尿嘧啶方案比較,多西他賽+順鉑方案聯閤常規分割放療可以穫得更高的pCR.
목적 비교국부진전기식관린암불동신보조방화료방안적근기료효.방법 수궤장154례국부진전기식관린암환자분위실험조(다서타새+순박화료)화대조조(순박+불뇨밀정화료),진행2개주기적화료화40 Gy적종격방료,3~4주후수술치료.이동기직접수술적237례식관린암환자(단순수술조)위삼조,비교근기료효.결과 전부환자균완성신보조방화료,기중9례인종류진전방기수술치료.실험조화대조조총적3~4급불량반응발생솔분별위53.2%화36.4% (x2=4.44,P=0.035),기중립세포감소적발생솔분별위20.7%화5.2% (x2=8.28,P=0.004).실험조수술절제솔위92.2% (71/77),완전성절제솔위89.6%(69/77);대조조수술절제솔위90.9%(70/77),완전성절제솔위85.7%(66/77);실험조화대조조적수술절제솔화완전성절제솔비교,차이균무통계학의의(P =0.77,P=0.46).실험조화대조조적병발증발생솔분별위21.9%(16/73)화23.6%(17/72),차이무통계학의의(x2 =0.059,P=0.81).실험조화대조조신보조방화료후적병리완전완해(pCR)솔분별35.1%(27/77)화20.8% (16/77),차이유통계학의의(x2=3.90,P=0.048).결론 여전통적순박+불뇨밀정방안비교,다서타새+순박방안연합상규분할방료가이획득경고적pCR.
Objective To compare the efficacy and feasibility of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel plus cisplatin or with cisplatin plus fluorouracil in the treatment of local advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Methods A total of 154 cases in the stage of cT3N0-1M0 were randomly assigned to two arms.The arm A received 2 cycles of doctaxel 75 mg/m2 plus cisplatin 25 mg/m2 d1-3 and 40 Gy of radiation therapy,and the arm B received 2 cycles of cisplatin 25 mg/m2 d1-3 plus fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 d1 ~ 5 and 40 Gy of radiation therapy.The surgery was performed 3-4 weeks later.Results Grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 53.2% of the patients in arm A and in 36.4% of the patients in arm B (P =0.035).Neutropenia occurred in 20.7% of the patients in arm A and 5.6% of the patients in arm B(P =0.004).Nine patients aborted surgery due to tumor progression.71 patients underwent resection in 73 cases of the arm A and 69 patients underwent complete resection,70 patients underwent resection in 72 cases and 70 complete resection of the arm B,respectively (P >0.05).No mortality was noted.The overall complication rate was similar in the two arms (21.9% vs.23.6%).Pathological complete response was achieved in 27 patients (35.1%) in the arm A and 16 patients (20.8%) in the arm B (P =0.048).Conclusions Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel plus cisplatin can be well tolerated and achieves a higher pathological complete response rate than with cisplatin plus fluorouracil.