肿瘤研究与临床
腫瘤研究與臨床
종류연구여림상
CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINIC
2014年
1期
17-19
,共3页
万广志%管静芝%刘鹏辉%朱文华%潘超
萬廣誌%管靜芝%劉鵬輝%硃文華%潘超
만엄지%관정지%류붕휘%주문화%반초
铜绿假单胞菌注射液%乌司他丁%恶性体腔积液
銅綠假單胞菌註射液%烏司他丁%噁性體腔積液
동록가단포균주사액%오사타정%악성체강적액
Pseudomonas aeruginosa injection%Ulinastatin%Malignant coelom effusion
目的 研究铜绿假单胞菌注射液联合乌司他丁胸腹腔注射治疗晚期恶性体腔积液的安全性及有效性.方法 52例晚期恶性胸腹腔积液患者,随机分为单药铜绿假单胞菌注射液组26例、铜绿假单胞菌注射液联合乌司他丁组26例.所有患者治疗前均行胸腹腔超声定量、定位检查后予以积液引流,引流后单药组胸腹腔一次性注射铜绿假单胞菌注射液10 ml,两药联合组引流后给予胸腹腔一次性注射铜绿假单胞菌注射液10 ml及乌司他丁30万U,每周2次,连续注药4次后对治疗前后疗效及患者不良反应进行评估.结果 单药铜绿组完全缓解(CR)1例,部分缓解(PR)8例,有效率34.6%;两药联合组:CR 2例,PR 14例,有效率61.5%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).单药组注药后出现发热者8例,两药联合组出现发热3例,两药联合组与单药组相比,发热明显减少,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 铜绿假单胞菌注射液联合乌司他丁胸腹腔注射,较单药铜绿组有效率明显提高,不良反应降低.
目的 研究銅綠假單胞菌註射液聯閤烏司他丁胸腹腔註射治療晚期噁性體腔積液的安全性及有效性.方法 52例晚期噁性胸腹腔積液患者,隨機分為單藥銅綠假單胞菌註射液組26例、銅綠假單胞菌註射液聯閤烏司他丁組26例.所有患者治療前均行胸腹腔超聲定量、定位檢查後予以積液引流,引流後單藥組胸腹腔一次性註射銅綠假單胞菌註射液10 ml,兩藥聯閤組引流後給予胸腹腔一次性註射銅綠假單胞菌註射液10 ml及烏司他丁30萬U,每週2次,連續註藥4次後對治療前後療效及患者不良反應進行評估.結果 單藥銅綠組完全緩解(CR)1例,部分緩解(PR)8例,有效率34.6%;兩藥聯閤組:CR 2例,PR 14例,有效率61.5%,差異有統計學意義(P<0.05).單藥組註藥後齣現髮熱者8例,兩藥聯閤組齣現髮熱3例,兩藥聯閤組與單藥組相比,髮熱明顯減少,但差異無統計學意義(P>0.05).結論 銅綠假單胞菌註射液聯閤烏司他丁胸腹腔註射,較單藥銅綠組有效率明顯提高,不良反應降低.
목적 연구동록가단포균주사액연합오사타정흉복강주사치료만기악성체강적액적안전성급유효성.방법 52례만기악성흉복강적액환자,수궤분위단약동록가단포균주사액조26례、동록가단포균주사액연합오사타정조26례.소유환자치료전균행흉복강초성정량、정위검사후여이적액인류,인류후단약조흉복강일차성주사동록가단포균주사액10 ml,량약연합조인류후급여흉복강일차성주사동록가단포균주사액10 ml급오사타정30만U,매주2차,련속주약4차후대치료전후료효급환자불량반응진행평고.결과 단약동록조완전완해(CR)1례,부분완해(PR)8례,유효솔34.6%;량약연합조:CR 2례,PR 14례,유효솔61.5%,차이유통계학의의(P<0.05).단약조주약후출현발열자8례,량약연합조출현발열3례,량약연합조여단약조상비,발열명현감소,단차이무통계학의의(P>0.05).결론 동록가단포균주사액연합오사타정흉복강주사,교단약동록조유효솔명현제고,불량반응강저.
Objective To evaluate the effect and safety of pseudomonas aeruginosa injection (PA-MSHA) combined with ulinastatin (UTI) injection in the treatment of patients with malignant pleural effusion and/or ascites.Methods 52 patients were randomly divided into PA-MSHA group and PA-MSHA combined with UTI group,each group including 26 patients.All patients were given ultrasonic testing before treatment.The single drug group was given PA-MSHA 10 ml intrapleural and/or intraperitoneal injection.The two-drug combination group was given PA-MSHA 10ml and UTI 300 000 U,twice per week.Evaluation of the efficacy and adverse reaction was performed after 4 times.Results The effective rate of single PA-MSHA group was 34.6 % (CR 1 case,PR 8 cases),while the effective rate of PA-MSHA combined with UTI group was 61.5 % (CR 2 cases,PR 14 cases).The effective rate of PA-MSHA combined with UTI group was statistically higher than that of single PA-MSHA group (P < 0.05).8 cases got fever in single PA-MSHA group,3 cases in PA-MSHA combined with UTI group got fever,side effect had no statistical significance (P > 0.05).Conclusion PA-MSHA combined with UTI has better effect in the treatment of patients with malignant pleural effusion and/or ascites compared with single PA-MSHA,and both treatments have low side effects.