国际泌尿系统杂志
國際泌尿繫統雜誌
국제비뇨계통잡지
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY
2014年
6期
852-856
,共5页
赵建华%阿力木·吐拉洪%王晨宇%李九智%罗勇%文彬
趙建華%阿力木·吐拉洪%王晨宇%李九智%囉勇%文彬
조건화%아력목·토랍홍%왕신우%리구지%라용%문빈
肾肿瘤%体层摄影术,X线计算机
腎腫瘤%體層攝影術,X線計算機
신종류%체층섭영술,X선계산궤
Kidney Neoplasms%Tomography,X-Ray Computed
目的 对比超声造影(CEUS)与增强CT(CECT)在诊断小于3cm肾实性肿瘤的应用价值.方法 选取本院2010年1月至2013年1月期间收治的小于3cm肾占位患者54例作为研究对象,分别进行CEUS及CECT检查,观察两种方法的增强强度、增强均匀、假包膜征、增强消退时间,比较其诊断准确率,CEUS利用时间-强度曲线分析软件,对比肾脏占位性病变与病变周围正常肾组织在峰值强度、达峰时间、曲线尖度及曲线下面积的差异.结果 CEUS明显增强42例,肿瘤可见假包膜征31例,呈快进慢出39例,与CECT相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),CEUS准确度92.59%,显著高于CECT(77.78%),差异有统计学意义.结论 CEUS对于小于3cm肾实性肿瘤在增强强度、增强均匀度、假包膜征、增强消退时间与CECT有不同的影像学表现,CEUS诊断小于3cm肾实性肿瘤的敏感度与准确度显著高于CECT.
目的 對比超聲造影(CEUS)與增彊CT(CECT)在診斷小于3cm腎實性腫瘤的應用價值.方法 選取本院2010年1月至2013年1月期間收治的小于3cm腎佔位患者54例作為研究對象,分彆進行CEUS及CECT檢查,觀察兩種方法的增彊彊度、增彊均勻、假包膜徵、增彊消退時間,比較其診斷準確率,CEUS利用時間-彊度麯線分析軟件,對比腎髒佔位性病變與病變週圍正常腎組織在峰值彊度、達峰時間、麯線尖度及麯線下麵積的差異.結果 CEUS明顯增彊42例,腫瘤可見假包膜徵31例,呈快進慢齣39例,與CECT相比差異有統計學意義(P<0.05),CEUS準確度92.59%,顯著高于CECT(77.78%),差異有統計學意義.結論 CEUS對于小于3cm腎實性腫瘤在增彊彊度、增彊均勻度、假包膜徵、增彊消退時間與CECT有不同的影像學錶現,CEUS診斷小于3cm腎實性腫瘤的敏感度與準確度顯著高于CECT.
목적 대비초성조영(CEUS)여증강CT(CECT)재진단소우3cm신실성종류적응용개치.방법 선취본원2010년1월지2013년1월기간수치적소우3cm신점위환자54례작위연구대상,분별진행CEUS급CECT검사,관찰량충방법적증강강도、증강균균、가포막정、증강소퇴시간,비교기진단준학솔,CEUS이용시간-강도곡선분석연건,대비신장점위성병변여병변주위정상신조직재봉치강도、체봉시간、곡선첨도급곡선하면적적차이.결과 CEUS명현증강42례,종류가견가포막정31례,정쾌진만출39례,여CECT상비차이유통계학의의(P<0.05),CEUS준학도92.59%,현저고우CECT(77.78%),차이유통계학의의.결론 CEUS대우소우3cm신실성종류재증강강도、증강균균도、가포막정、증강소퇴시간여CECT유불동적영상학표현,CEUS진단소우3cm신실성종류적민감도여준학도현저고우CECT.
Objectives To compare the application value of contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and enhanced CT(CECT) in the diagnosis of renal tumors of less than 3 cm.Methods 54 cases of patients with renal parenchymal tumor admitted in our hospital from January,2010 to January 30,2013 were selected,and all patients were given CEUS and CECT examination.The enhanced intensity,enhanced evenness,pseudocapsule sign,enhance extinction time of the two examination methods were observed,and accuracy rate was compared.Results CEUS significant characteristics showed that 42 cases had significant intensity,31 cases had pseudocapsule signs and 39 cases had appeared enhancement pattern as "fast-in and slow-out",and the differences were statistically significant(P <0.05).The accuracy (92.59%) of CEUS were significantly higher than those of CECT (77.78%),and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).Conclusions CEUS has different imaging findings with CECT in aspects of renal tumor enhanced intensity,pseudocapsule sign and enhance extinction.The sensitivity and accuracy of CEUS for kidney cancer diagnosis are higher than those of CECT.