中华急诊医学杂志
中華急診醫學雜誌
중화급진의학잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE
2013年
7期
721-725
,共5页
张伟%孙中华%米杰%罗欢%樊瑞娟%张健%齐向前
張偉%孫中華%米傑%囉歡%樊瑞娟%張健%齊嚮前
장위%손중화%미걸%라환%번서연%장건%제향전
支架血栓%主要不良心脏事件%三联抗血小板治疗%双联抗血小板治疗
支架血栓%主要不良心髒事件%三聯抗血小闆治療%雙聯抗血小闆治療
지가혈전%주요불양심장사건%삼련항혈소판치료%쌍련항혈소판치료
Stent thrombosis%Major adverse cardiac events%Triple anti-platelet therapy%Dual anti-platelet therapy
目的 探究三联抗血小板(小剂量替罗非班加阿司匹林和氯吡格雷)较双联抗血小板(阿司匹林和氯吡咯雷)对预防急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者植入药物洗脱支架(DES)后30 d内支架内血栓(ST)和主要不良心脏事件(MACE)的有效性和安全性.方法 回顾性搜集2004年3月到2010年1 1月因ACS就诊于泰达国际心血管病医院并植入DES的患者2904例,部分患者采用双联抗血小板治疗(双联组,n=1145),部分患者采用三联抗血小板治疗(三联组,n=1759),通过Fisher确切概率法比较两组患者PCI术后30 d内ST、MACE及临床不良反应的发生率.结果 虽然两组间患者的年龄、病变狭窄程度、吸烟、糖尿病、高脂血症和冠状动脉弥漫性病变的比率有差异,但通过Cox分析发现以上因素对终点事件的发生无影响,两组患者其余基线资料的比较差异无统计学意义.三联组主要终点事件ST的发生率低于双联组(0.11% vs.1.05%,P=0.0036),三联组较双联组相对风险降低89.52%.三联组次要终点事件MACE(包括心源性死亡、紧急靶血管血运重建、心肌梗死)的发生率也低于双联组(0.17% vs.1.48%,P=0.0005),三联组较双联组相对风险降低88.51%,其中三联组心源性死亡、紧急靶血管血运重建的发生率低于双联组,差异具有统计学意义,但两组间心肌梗死的发生率比较差异无统计学意义.两组中均无严重出血事件;三联组轻度出血事件发生8例(0.45%),双联组发生4例(0.35%),差异无统计学意义(P =0.6720).三联组急性血小板减少症发生8例(0.45%),双联组发生1例(0.09%),差异也无统计学意义(P=0.083).结论 与双联组相比,三联组ACS患者PCI术后30 d内发生ST和MACE的风险明显降低,而出血风险及急性血小板减少症的发生率并没有增加.
目的 探究三聯抗血小闆(小劑量替囉非班加阿司匹林和氯吡格雷)較雙聯抗血小闆(阿司匹林和氯吡咯雷)對預防急性冠脈綜閤徵(ACS)患者植入藥物洗脫支架(DES)後30 d內支架內血栓(ST)和主要不良心髒事件(MACE)的有效性和安全性.方法 迴顧性搜集2004年3月到2010年1 1月因ACS就診于泰達國際心血管病醫院併植入DES的患者2904例,部分患者採用雙聯抗血小闆治療(雙聯組,n=1145),部分患者採用三聯抗血小闆治療(三聯組,n=1759),通過Fisher確切概率法比較兩組患者PCI術後30 d內ST、MACE及臨床不良反應的髮生率.結果 雖然兩組間患者的年齡、病變狹窄程度、吸煙、糖尿病、高脂血癥和冠狀動脈瀰漫性病變的比率有差異,但通過Cox分析髮現以上因素對終點事件的髮生無影響,兩組患者其餘基線資料的比較差異無統計學意義.三聯組主要終點事件ST的髮生率低于雙聯組(0.11% vs.1.05%,P=0.0036),三聯組較雙聯組相對風險降低89.52%.三聯組次要終點事件MACE(包括心源性死亡、緊急靶血管血運重建、心肌梗死)的髮生率也低于雙聯組(0.17% vs.1.48%,P=0.0005),三聯組較雙聯組相對風險降低88.51%,其中三聯組心源性死亡、緊急靶血管血運重建的髮生率低于雙聯組,差異具有統計學意義,但兩組間心肌梗死的髮生率比較差異無統計學意義.兩組中均無嚴重齣血事件;三聯組輕度齣血事件髮生8例(0.45%),雙聯組髮生4例(0.35%),差異無統計學意義(P =0.6720).三聯組急性血小闆減少癥髮生8例(0.45%),雙聯組髮生1例(0.09%),差異也無統計學意義(P=0.083).結論 與雙聯組相比,三聯組ACS患者PCI術後30 d內髮生ST和MACE的風險明顯降低,而齣血風險及急性血小闆減少癥的髮生率併沒有增加.
목적 탐구삼련항혈소판(소제량체라비반가아사필림화록필격뢰)교쌍련항혈소판(아사필림화록필각뢰)대예방급성관맥종합정(ACS)환자식입약물세탈지가(DES)후30 d내지가내혈전(ST)화주요불양심장사건(MACE)적유효성화안전성.방법 회고성수집2004년3월도2010년1 1월인ACS취진우태체국제심혈관병의원병식입DES적환자2904례,부분환자채용쌍련항혈소판치료(쌍련조,n=1145),부분환자채용삼련항혈소판치료(삼련조,n=1759),통과Fisher학절개솔법비교량조환자PCI술후30 d내ST、MACE급림상불량반응적발생솔.결과 수연량조간환자적년령、병변협착정도、흡연、당뇨병、고지혈증화관상동맥미만성병변적비솔유차이,단통과Cox분석발현이상인소대종점사건적발생무영향,량조환자기여기선자료적비교차이무통계학의의.삼련조주요종점사건ST적발생솔저우쌍련조(0.11% vs.1.05%,P=0.0036),삼련조교쌍련조상대풍험강저89.52%.삼련조차요종점사건MACE(포괄심원성사망、긴급파혈관혈운중건、심기경사)적발생솔야저우쌍련조(0.17% vs.1.48%,P=0.0005),삼련조교쌍련조상대풍험강저88.51%,기중삼련조심원성사망、긴급파혈관혈운중건적발생솔저우쌍련조,차이구유통계학의의,단량조간심기경사적발생솔비교차이무통계학의의.량조중균무엄중출혈사건;삼련조경도출혈사건발생8례(0.45%),쌍련조발생4례(0.35%),차이무통계학의의(P =0.6720).삼련조급성혈소판감소증발생8례(0.45%),쌍련조발생1례(0.09%),차이야무통계학의의(P=0.083).결론 여쌍련조상비,삼련조ACS환자PCI술후30 d내발생ST화MACE적풍험명현강저,이출혈풍험급급성혈소판감소증적발생솔병몰유증가.
Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of triple anti-platelet therapy (low-dose tirofiban plus aspirin and clopidogrel) comparing to dual anti-platelet therapy (aspirin and clopidogrel) in preventing stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) within 30 days after implantation of drug-eluting stent (DES) in ACS patients.Methods A total of 2904 ACS patients treated with DES from March 2004 to November 2010 were enrolled for retrospective study.Of them,1145 patients were treated with dual anti-platelet therapy (DAT) and 1759 patients with triple anti-platelet therapy (TAT).The incidences of ST,MACE (cardiac death,urgent target vessel revasculanization and myocardial infarction) and side effects occurred within 30 days after PCI were compared between two groups by Fisher' s exact test.Results (1)Although there were significant differences in age,the degree of coronary stenosis,the number of smokers,diabetes,hyperlipidemia and coronary diffuse lesion between two groups,but these differences did not impact on the end point events showed by Cox analysis.The rest of the general condition of patients between two groups was no difference.(2) The incidence of ST as primary end point was lower in TAT group than that in DAT group (0.11% vs.1.05%,P =0.0036),reducing the relative risk by 89.52%.In addition,the incidence of MACT as secondary end point was also lower in TAT group than that in DAT group (0.17% vs.1.48%,P =0.0005),reducing the relative risk by 88.51%.Among the total,the incidences of cardiac death and urgent target vessel re-vascularization in TAT group were lower than those in DAT group with significant differences.However,there was no difference in the incidence of myocardial infarction between two groups.(3) Both two groups had no severe hemorrhage complication,the incidence of mild hemorrhage was similar in two groups (0.45% vs.0.35%,P =0.6720).Nesides,the incidence of acute thrombocytopenia between two groups was also similar (0.45% vs.0.09%,P =0.083).Conclusions The patients with ACS in the TAT group have significant lower incidence of ST and MACE than those in the DAT group within 30 days after PCI.While the risk of bleeding and the incidence of acute thrombocytopenia do not increase.