中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2012年
33期
41-44
,共4页
彭丽%王蓓%李丽%章舒琦%朱大乔
彭麗%王蓓%李麗%章舒琦%硃大喬
팽려%왕배%리려%장서기%주대교
护士%护生%体形%体形评定图
護士%護生%體形%體形評定圖
호사%호생%체형%체형평정도
Registered nurses%Nursing students%Body image%Figure rating scale
目的 了解护士(生)对正常和理想体形的认知现况,分析个体的体质量水平、体质量认知偏差对此种认知的影响.方法 采用方便抽样方法,对上海市某两所三级医院的407名实习护生和某所三级医院的466名注册护士进行问卷调查.调查内容包括人口社会学特征、体重指数和感知体质量水平.并采用Stunkard体形评定图(figure rating scale,FRS)考察个体对两性正常和理想体形的认知.结果 护士(生)对男性体形的FRS评分,无论是正常体形还是理想体形,均显著高于对女性相应体形的评分;护士(生)对理想体形的FRS评分,无论是评判男性还是评判女性,均显著低于对应正常体形的评分.护士(生)的体质量水平、体质量感知偏差与其对两性正常和理想体形的评判无显著相关.结论 护士(生)更认同男性正常和理想体形应比女性相应体形“稍大”,而两性理想体形应比相应正常体形“稍小”.上述体形认知偏差对护士(生)临床实践的影响还有待进一步研究.
目的 瞭解護士(生)對正常和理想體形的認知現況,分析箇體的體質量水平、體質量認知偏差對此種認知的影響.方法 採用方便抽樣方法,對上海市某兩所三級醫院的407名實習護生和某所三級醫院的466名註冊護士進行問捲調查.調查內容包括人口社會學特徵、體重指數和感知體質量水平.併採用Stunkard體形評定圖(figure rating scale,FRS)攷察箇體對兩性正常和理想體形的認知.結果 護士(生)對男性體形的FRS評分,無論是正常體形還是理想體形,均顯著高于對女性相應體形的評分;護士(生)對理想體形的FRS評分,無論是評判男性還是評判女性,均顯著低于對應正常體形的評分.護士(生)的體質量水平、體質量感知偏差與其對兩性正常和理想體形的評判無顯著相關.結論 護士(生)更認同男性正常和理想體形應比女性相應體形“稍大”,而兩性理想體形應比相應正常體形“稍小”.上述體形認知偏差對護士(生)臨床實踐的影響還有待進一步研究.
목적 료해호사(생)대정상화이상체형적인지현황,분석개체적체질량수평、체질량인지편차대차충인지적영향.방법 채용방편추양방법,대상해시모량소삼급의원적407명실습호생화모소삼급의원적466명주책호사진행문권조사.조사내용포괄인구사회학특정、체중지수화감지체질량수평.병채용Stunkard체형평정도(figure rating scale,FRS)고찰개체대량성정상화이상체형적인지.결과 호사(생)대남성체형적FRS평분,무론시정상체형환시이상체형,균현저고우대녀성상응체형적평분;호사(생)대이상체형적FRS평분,무론시평판남성환시평판녀성,균현저저우대응정상체형적평분.호사(생)적체질량수평、체질량감지편차여기대량성정상화이상체형적평판무현저상관.결론 호사(생)경인동남성정상화이상체형응비녀성상응체형“초대”,이량성이상체형응비상응정상체형“초소”.상술체형인지편차대호사(생)림상실천적영향환유대진일보연구.
Objective To understand the perceptions of normal and ideal body size in registered nurses and nursing students,and to analyze the impacts of individual weight levels and misperception of body weight on their such cognitions.Methods A cross-sectional survey of 407 nursing students from two hospitals and 466 registered nurses from one hospital was conducted with the questionnaire survey.Sociodemographic information,actual weight,perceived weight levels and scores for figure rating scale were included.Results FRS scores for normal and ideal body size to male were significantly higher than to female either in registered nurses or in nursing students; FRS scores for ideal body size to both sexes were significantly lower than those for normal body size among registered nurses and nursing students.There were no statistically significant associations between FRS scores for normal and ideal body size and individuals' weight levels and misperceptions of body weight among registered nurses and nursing students.Conclusions There existed differences in rating female and male body size among registered nurses and nursing students,with “bigger” normal and ideal body sizes to male,Nurses preferred to “thinner” ideal body size in comparison to normal body size.