中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2013年
28期
46-50
,共5页
麦嘉轩%谢婉花%马春花%邓叶青%戴黎黎
麥嘉軒%謝婉花%馬春花%鄧葉青%戴黎黎
맥가헌%사완화%마춘화%산협청%대려려
中文版疾病不确定感父母量表%信度%效度
中文版疾病不確定感父母量錶%信度%效度
중문판질병불학정감부모량표%신도%효도
Parents' perception of uncertainty scale%Reliability%Validity
目的 翻译英文版疾病不确定感父母量表(parents' perception of uncertainty scale,PPUS)并进行条目分析和筛选,初步检验量表修订后的信效度.方法 翻译PPUS,抽取210例住院患儿的父母进行调查.运用频数分析法、离散程度法、相关系数法等多种方法进行条目分析和筛选;用内部一致性检验、Pearson相关分析和探索性因子分析等检验量表的信效度.结果 中文版PPUS包含28个条目.总量表的Cronbach α系数和奇偶折半信度系数分别为0.844、0.835;4个维度的Cronbach α系数在0.537~0.770.条目与总量表的相关系数为0.300~0.737,与所属维度的相关系数为0.376~0.762,与其他维度的相关系数为0.028~0.514;各维度与总量表的相关系数为0.480~0.863;各维度间的相关系数为0.226~0.536.专家评定内容效度中I-CVI介于0.75~1.00,S-CVI/Ave为0.928.主成分分析限定4个因子数后,因子累计方差贡献率为41.401%,所有条目的最大因子负荷值均>0.3,大部分条目进入各自维度.结论 中文版PPUS具有较好的信效度,可作为住院患儿父母疾病不确定感的评估工具.
目的 翻譯英文版疾病不確定感父母量錶(parents' perception of uncertainty scale,PPUS)併進行條目分析和篩選,初步檢驗量錶脩訂後的信效度.方法 翻譯PPUS,抽取210例住院患兒的父母進行調查.運用頻數分析法、離散程度法、相關繫數法等多種方法進行條目分析和篩選;用內部一緻性檢驗、Pearson相關分析和探索性因子分析等檢驗量錶的信效度.結果 中文版PPUS包含28箇條目.總量錶的Cronbach α繫數和奇偶摺半信度繫數分彆為0.844、0.835;4箇維度的Cronbach α繫數在0.537~0.770.條目與總量錶的相關繫數為0.300~0.737,與所屬維度的相關繫數為0.376~0.762,與其他維度的相關繫數為0.028~0.514;各維度與總量錶的相關繫數為0.480~0.863;各維度間的相關繫數為0.226~0.536.專傢評定內容效度中I-CVI介于0.75~1.00,S-CVI/Ave為0.928.主成分分析限定4箇因子數後,因子纍計方差貢獻率為41.401%,所有條目的最大因子負荷值均>0.3,大部分條目進入各自維度.結論 中文版PPUS具有較好的信效度,可作為住院患兒父母疾病不確定感的評估工具.
목적 번역영문판질병불학정감부모량표(parents' perception of uncertainty scale,PPUS)병진행조목분석화사선,초보검험량표수정후적신효도.방법 번역PPUS,추취210례주원환인적부모진행조사.운용빈수분석법、리산정도법、상관계수법등다충방법진행조목분석화사선;용내부일치성검험、Pearson상관분석화탐색성인자분석등검험량표적신효도.결과 중문판PPUS포함28개조목.총량표적Cronbach α계수화기우절반신도계수분별위0.844、0.835;4개유도적Cronbach α계수재0.537~0.770.조목여총량표적상관계수위0.300~0.737,여소속유도적상관계수위0.376~0.762,여기타유도적상관계수위0.028~0.514;각유도여총량표적상관계수위0.480~0.863;각유도간적상관계수위0.226~0.536.전가평정내용효도중I-CVI개우0.75~1.00,S-CVI/Ave위0.928.주성분분석한정4개인자수후,인자루계방차공헌솔위41.401%,소유조목적최대인자부하치균>0.3,대부분조목진입각자유도.결론 중문판PPUS구유교호적신효도,가작위주원환인부모질병불학정감적평고공구.
Objective To translate Parents' Perception of Uncertainty Scale (PPUS) into Chinese,analyze and selected items,and then test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of PPUS initially.Methods 210 parents of hospitalized children were recruited for the investigation.Frequency analysis,dispersion degree analysis,correlation analysis and so on were applied to analyze and select items.Internal consistency test,Pearson correlation analysis and exploratory factor analysis etc.were applied to test reliability and validity of the scale.Results The final Chinese version of PPUS contained 28 items.The Cronbach α and parity split-half reliability coefficients were 0.844 and 0.835; The Cronbach α coefficient of 4 dimensions ranged from 0.537 to 0.770.The item-total scale correlation coefficient ranged from 0.300 to 0.737.Item-dimension correlation coefficients ranged from 0.376 to 0.762.Item-other dimension correlation coefficients ranged from 0.028 to 0.514.Dimension-total scale correlation coefficients ranged from 0.480 to 0.863 and those between dimensions ranged from 0.226 to 0.536.In the content validity assessed by experts,I-CVI ranged from 0.75 to 1.00,S-CVI/Ave was 0.928.Four-factor model was performed in the principal component analysis and they explained for 41.401% variances.The maximum factor loading of all items were higher than 0.3,and most of items had adequate loadings in related dimensions.Conclusions Chinese version of PPUS had appropriate reliability and validity as an assessment tool for parental uncertainty in illness of hospitalized children' parents.