中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2013年
36期
8-11
,共4页
分隔输液器%输液器挤压封管法%末端排气法
分隔輸液器%輸液器擠壓封管法%末耑排氣法
분격수액기%수액기제압봉관법%말단배기법
Intrafix%Pressing pipe method%Top-down method
目的 探讨分隔输液器在临床应用中所引发的护理问题的解决办法.方法 将我院急诊科2013年2～5月出现的324例应用分隔输液器出现回血的患者进行拔针分组实验,将患者随机分为实验组A与对照组A各162例.实验组A采用挤压拔针封管法,对照组A采用普通拔针法.将实验组A与对照组A中出现的206例应用分隔输液器过程中产生气泡的患者进行分组,分别为实验组B与对照组B各103例.实验组B采用末端排气法,而对照组B采用常规的上行排气法.比较2组拔针及排气的效果.计算在使用输液冲管法时,为滴入剩余药品所用的最少冲管时间.结果 应用挤压拔针法的实验组A拔针效果明显好于对照组A,差异具有统计学意义;应用末端排气法的实验组B排气效果明显好于采用上行排气法的对照组B,差异具有统计学意义.采用点滴系数的方法来计算最短冲管时间可以更好的保证药品进入患者体内.结论 挤压拔针法可以有效的解决在使用分隔输液器拔针时产生的回血问题;末端排气法可以解决分隔输液器中无法使用上行排气的问题;冲管法与正压卷管法应用在分隔输液器中可以最大限度的减少药液浪费.
目的 探討分隔輸液器在臨床應用中所引髮的護理問題的解決辦法.方法 將我院急診科2013年2～5月齣現的324例應用分隔輸液器齣現迴血的患者進行拔針分組實驗,將患者隨機分為實驗組A與對照組A各162例.實驗組A採用擠壓拔針封管法,對照組A採用普通拔針法.將實驗組A與對照組A中齣現的206例應用分隔輸液器過程中產生氣泡的患者進行分組,分彆為實驗組B與對照組B各103例.實驗組B採用末耑排氣法,而對照組B採用常規的上行排氣法.比較2組拔針及排氣的效果.計算在使用輸液遲管法時,為滴入剩餘藥品所用的最少遲管時間.結果 應用擠壓拔針法的實驗組A拔針效果明顯好于對照組A,差異具有統計學意義;應用末耑排氣法的實驗組B排氣效果明顯好于採用上行排氣法的對照組B,差異具有統計學意義.採用點滴繫數的方法來計算最短遲管時間可以更好的保證藥品進入患者體內.結論 擠壓拔針法可以有效的解決在使用分隔輸液器拔針時產生的迴血問題;末耑排氣法可以解決分隔輸液器中無法使用上行排氣的問題;遲管法與正壓捲管法應用在分隔輸液器中可以最大限度的減少藥液浪費.
목적 탐토분격수액기재림상응용중소인발적호리문제적해결판법.방법 장아원급진과2013년2～5월출현적324례응용분격수액기출현회혈적환자진행발침분조실험,장환자수궤분위실험조A여대조조A각162례.실험조A채용제압발침봉관법,대조조A채용보통발침법.장실험조A여대조조A중출현적206례응용분격수액기과정중산생기포적환자진행분조,분별위실험조B여대조조B각103례.실험조B채용말단배기법,이대조조B채용상규적상행배기법.비교2조발침급배기적효과.계산재사용수액충관법시,위적입잉여약품소용적최소충관시간.결과 응용제압발침법적실험조A발침효과명현호우대조조A,차이구유통계학의의;응용말단배기법적실험조B배기효과명현호우채용상행배기법적대조조B,차이구유통계학의의.채용점적계수적방법래계산최단충관시간가이경호적보증약품진입환자체내.결론 제압발침법가이유효적해결재사용분격수액기발침시산생적회혈문제;말단배기법가이해결분격수액기중무법사용상행배기적문제;충관법여정압권관법응용재분격수액기중가이최대한도적감소약액낭비.
Objective To find out some ways to solve the problems which are dealing with the clinical application of intrafix.Methods From February to May 2013,324 patients with back blood using intrafix in emergency department were randomly assigned to the experimental group A and the control group A,with 162 patients in each group.The experimental group A used the method of pressing pipe while pulling out the needles when transfusion was over,while the control group A used traditional ways.206 patients who occurred bubbles in the intrafix among the above two groups were divided into the experimental group B and the control group B.The experimental group B got rid of the bubbles using top-down method,the control group B used traditional ways.The effect of withdrawing the needles and exhaustion of bubbles were compared.The least flushing time of remaining liquid using transfusion pipe flushing method was calculated.Results The experimental group A and the experimental group B were better in withdrawing the needles and exhaustion of bubbles compared with those of the control group A and the control group B.Using the method of drop coefficient to calculate the least flushing time can ensure the drug to be transfused into the body thoroughly.Conclusions When transfusion is over,pressing intrafix pipe will have a better result than the traditional way when pulling out the pipe.Top-down method can clearly settle the problem of intrafix pipe,which can not get rid of bubble via traditional way.Flushing pipe and press pipe method can apparently decrease drug waste.
