中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2014年
6期
5-8
,共4页
李亚萌%王鹏%单岩%吴国华%张艳%王璐莹%万海燕
李亞萌%王鵬%單巖%吳國華%張豔%王璐瑩%萬海燕
리아맹%왕붕%단암%오국화%장염%왕로형%만해연
心理弹性%信度%效度%护士
心理彈性%信度%效度%護士
심리탄성%신도%효도%호사
Resilience scale%Reliability%Validity%Nurses
目的 评估Connor-Davidson弹性量表(CD-RISC)在护士中应用的信效度.方法 首先选择1 084名护士对CD-RISC进行项目分析及验证源量表的结构;将1 084名护士随机分成样本1和样本2各542名,分别对源量表进行修订与信效度检验.结果 CD-RISC源量表结构的验证性因子分析x2/df为6.714,RMSEA为0.103,GFI、AGFI、CFI分别为0.804、0.764、0.718;探索性因素分析后共保留21个条目,包括3个因子,因子负荷为0.490~0.755;累计方差解释率为54.034%.总量表、各因子的内部一致性系数分别为0.688~0.930,4周后的重测信度为0.825~0.917.各因子与总分间成高度相关,相关系数为0.683~0.943;各因子间相关,相关系数为0.564 ~0.765.修订后量表的验证性因子分析x2/dr为3.304,RMSEA为0.065,GFI、AGFI、CFI分别为0.902、0.878、0.913;修订后量表总分及各因子与抑郁、焦虑、躯体化因子成负相关.结论 修订后的CD-RISC具有良好的心理测量学指标,适用于护士人群心理弹性的研究.
目的 評估Connor-Davidson彈性量錶(CD-RISC)在護士中應用的信效度.方法 首先選擇1 084名護士對CD-RISC進行項目分析及驗證源量錶的結構;將1 084名護士隨機分成樣本1和樣本2各542名,分彆對源量錶進行脩訂與信效度檢驗.結果 CD-RISC源量錶結構的驗證性因子分析x2/df為6.714,RMSEA為0.103,GFI、AGFI、CFI分彆為0.804、0.764、0.718;探索性因素分析後共保留21箇條目,包括3箇因子,因子負荷為0.490~0.755;纍計方差解釋率為54.034%.總量錶、各因子的內部一緻性繫數分彆為0.688~0.930,4週後的重測信度為0.825~0.917.各因子與總分間成高度相關,相關繫數為0.683~0.943;各因子間相關,相關繫數為0.564 ~0.765.脩訂後量錶的驗證性因子分析x2/dr為3.304,RMSEA為0.065,GFI、AGFI、CFI分彆為0.902、0.878、0.913;脩訂後量錶總分及各因子與抑鬱、焦慮、軀體化因子成負相關.結論 脩訂後的CD-RISC具有良好的心理測量學指標,適用于護士人群心理彈性的研究.
목적 평고Connor-Davidson탄성량표(CD-RISC)재호사중응용적신효도.방법 수선선택1 084명호사대CD-RISC진행항목분석급험증원량표적결구;장1 084명호사수궤분성양본1화양본2각542명,분별대원량표진행수정여신효도검험.결과 CD-RISC원량표결구적험증성인자분석x2/df위6.714,RMSEA위0.103,GFI、AGFI、CFI분별위0.804、0.764、0.718;탐색성인소분석후공보류21개조목,포괄3개인자,인자부하위0.490~0.755;루계방차해석솔위54.034%.총량표、각인자적내부일치성계수분별위0.688~0.930,4주후적중측신도위0.825~0.917.각인자여총분간성고도상관,상관계수위0.683~0.943;각인자간상관,상관계수위0.564 ~0.765.수정후량표적험증성인자분석x2/dr위3.304,RMSEA위0.065,GFI、AGFI、CFI분별위0.902、0.878、0.913;수정후량표총분급각인자여억욱、초필、구체화인자성부상관.결론 수정후적CD-RISC구유량호적심리측량학지표,괄용우호사인군심리탄성적연구.
Objective To examine the reliability and validity of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in nurses in China.Methods Item analysis and confirmatory factor analysis of CD-RISC was conducted.A total of 1 084 nurses were randomly divided into 2 groups using random number table.One group was used to revise CD-RISC and the other to evaluate its reliability and validity.Results Confirmatory factor analysis of the original RSA showed thatx2/df,RMSEA,GFI,AGFI,CFI were 6.714,0.103,0.804,0.764,and 0.718,respectively.The number of item was reduced to 21 based on exploratory factor analysis results,including three factors which explained 54.034% of the total variance.Factor loading ranged from 0.490 to 0.755.Coefficient of internal consistency ranged from 0.688 to 0.930 and the 4 week test-retest reliabilities ranged from 0.825 to 0.917.The factor scores were closely correlated with the total scores with correlation coefficient ranging from 0.683 to 0.943.The factors were closely correlated with each other with correlation coefficient ranging from 0.564 to 0765.The confirmatory factor analysis of the revised CD-RISC showed that x2/df,RMSEA,GFI,AGF,CFI were 3.304,0.065,0.902,0.878,and 0.913 respectively.The total scores and all factors were negatively correlated with depression and anxiety and somatization.Conclusions The revised CD-RISC has good psychometric properties and can be used to measure the resilience of nurses.