中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2014年
29期
17-20
,共4页
任立山%骆宏%范为群%蓝戈文
任立山%駱宏%範為群%藍戈文
임립산%락굉%범위군%람과문
成功老龄化%多维度健康评估%量表编制
成功老齡化%多維度健康評估%量錶編製
성공노령화%다유도건강평고%량표편제
Successful ageing%Multidimensional health measurement%Scale development
目的 根据成功老龄化(successful ageing,SA)理论框架编制成功老龄化多维度评估量表(successful ageing multidimensional assessment scale,SAMAS),并检验信效度.方法 通过文献分析,确定SA评价维度、结构及评分方法.经专家咨询、半结构式访谈及2次施测,形成SAMAS.用预测样本进行项目分析、评定者间信度和校标效度检验,用正式施测样本进行项目分析、内部一致性检验、评定者间信度及效标效度检验.并对正式施测样本间隔2周后重测.采用日常生活能力量表(ADL)、简易精神状态量表(MMSE)、社会功能缺陷量表(SSDS)及纽芬兰纪念大学幸福度量表(MUNSH)作校标.结果 SAMAS由5个维度组成:目前慢性病控制情况、躯体功能、认知功能、社会功能、主观幸福感.项目分析示量表各维度分与总分间均呈正相关;评定者间信度在0.65~0.86,重测信度在0.66~0.85,内部一致性信度为0.88;量表躯体功能及社会功能维度得分与对应校标量表得分均呈负相关,认知功能及主观幸福感维度得分与对应校标量均呈正相关.结论 SAMAS信、效度均在心理测量学可接受范围内,可为医护人员量化评估老年人整体健康状况进行护理干预提供参考工具,同时区分出SA组与非SA组.
目的 根據成功老齡化(successful ageing,SA)理論框架編製成功老齡化多維度評估量錶(successful ageing multidimensional assessment scale,SAMAS),併檢驗信效度.方法 通過文獻分析,確定SA評價維度、結構及評分方法.經專傢咨詢、半結構式訪談及2次施測,形成SAMAS.用預測樣本進行項目分析、評定者間信度和校標效度檢驗,用正式施測樣本進行項目分析、內部一緻性檢驗、評定者間信度及效標效度檢驗.併對正式施測樣本間隔2週後重測.採用日常生活能力量錶(ADL)、簡易精神狀態量錶(MMSE)、社會功能缺陷量錶(SSDS)及紐芬蘭紀唸大學倖福度量錶(MUNSH)作校標.結果 SAMAS由5箇維度組成:目前慢性病控製情況、軀體功能、認知功能、社會功能、主觀倖福感.項目分析示量錶各維度分與總分間均呈正相關;評定者間信度在0.65~0.86,重測信度在0.66~0.85,內部一緻性信度為0.88;量錶軀體功能及社會功能維度得分與對應校標量錶得分均呈負相關,認知功能及主觀倖福感維度得分與對應校標量均呈正相關.結論 SAMAS信、效度均在心理測量學可接受範圍內,可為醫護人員量化評估老年人整體健康狀況進行護理榦預提供參攷工具,同時區分齣SA組與非SA組.
목적 근거성공노령화(successful ageing,SA)이론광가편제성공노령화다유도평고량표(successful ageing multidimensional assessment scale,SAMAS),병검험신효도.방법 통과문헌분석,학정SA평개유도、결구급평분방법.경전가자순、반결구식방담급2차시측,형성SAMAS.용예측양본진행항목분석、평정자간신도화교표효도검험,용정식시측양본진행항목분석、내부일치성검험、평정자간신도급효표효도검험.병대정식시측양본간격2주후중측.채용일상생활능역량표(ADL)、간역정신상태량표(MMSE)、사회공능결함량표(SSDS)급뉴분란기념대학행복도량표(MUNSH)작교표.결과 SAMAS유5개유도조성:목전만성병공제정황、구체공능、인지공능、사회공능、주관행복감.항목분석시량표각유도분여총분간균정정상관;평정자간신도재0.65~0.86,중측신도재0.66~0.85,내부일치성신도위0.88;량표구체공능급사회공능유도득분여대응교표량표득분균정부상관,인지공능급주관행복감유도득분여대응교표량균정정상관.결론 SAMAS신、효도균재심리측량학가접수범위내,가위의호인원양화평고노년인정체건강상황진행호리간예제공삼고공구,동시구분출SA조여비SA조.
Objective According to the theoretic framework of successful ageing,this study developed a multidimensional Successful Ageing Assessment Scale and tested its reliability and validity.Methods Through literature review,the study determined evaluative dimension,structure and scoring method.Then,the Successful Ageing Multidimensional Assessment Scale(SAMAS) was developed and was optimized by the expert consultation,semi-structured interview and twice tests.The predicted sample was conducted with item analysis,and testing of reliability and validity; the formal tested sample was conducted with item analysis,conformance testing and testing of reliability and validity.Then the formal tested sample was tested and retested two weeks later.The intestine emendatory Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADL),Mini Mental State Examination Scale (MMSE),Social Disability Screening Schedule (SDSS) and Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness(MUNSH) were used to test its criteri-on validity.Results SAMAS consisted of 5 dimensions,including chronic disease state,physical perfor-mance,cognitive function,social function,subjective well-being.Item analysis showed the dimensions of scale and total scale scores had positive correlation.In conformance testing,the Kappa value was 0.65~0.86,test-retest reliability was 0.66~0.85 and the internal consistency reliability was 0.88.The correl-ative coefficient of the physical performance and social function scores were negatively correlated with ADL scores and SSDS scores,the correlative coefficient of the cognitive function and subjective well-being scores were positively correlated with MMSE scores and MUNSH scores.Conclusions SAMAS suggested good reliability,validity and could well evaluate comprehensive health for the elderly,at the same time could distinguish between SA and non SA group.