CAJ | 학술논문

目的明确本科护生护理学基础操作技能水平的差异,探讨操作考核评价方式特点.方法采用描述性统计、秩变换后的单因素方差分析及Scheffe多重比较方法,对1 340份本科护生期末《护理学基础》操作考核记录单数据进行统计分析.结果单项操作成绩的分布除了“生命体征测量”一项外,均符合正态分布;成绩分布呈尖峰负偏态,略偏向于70～90分数段,分数段60、70分的频数明显高于周围分数段;吸痰、给氧、无菌操作得分最低;肌肉注射和铺备用床得分最高.结论基础护理操作成绩分布合理,教育教学和评分考核基本可信,但仍有一定的主观因素干扰;学生整体成绩较好;专项操作得分因抽象或具象、原则性问题而呈现差异.
목적 명학본과호생호이학기출조작기능수평적차이,탐토조작고핵평개방식특점.방법 채용묘술성통계、질변환후적단인소방차분석급Scheffe다중비교방법,대1 340빈본과호생기말《호이학기출》조작고핵기록단수거진행통계분석.결과 단항조작성적적분포제료“생명체정측량”일항외,균부합정태분포;성적분포정첨봉부편태,략편향우70～90분수단,분수단60、70분적빈수명현고우주위분수단;흡담、급양、무균조작득분최저;기육주사화포비용상득분최고.결론 기출호리조작성적분포합리,교육교학화평분고핵기본가신,단잉유일정적주관인소간우;학생정체성적교호;전항조작득분인추상혹구상、원칙성문제이정현차이.
Objective To illustrate the different levels of fundamental nursing skills of undergradu ate nursing students,and explore the characteristics of the assessment method.Methods With descriptive statistics,one-way analysis of variance after rank transformation,and multiple comparison (Scheffe),we made an analysis of 1 340 assessment records of fundamental nursing skills.Results The score distributions of all the skills,but the skill of measuring vital signs,conformed to Gaussian distribution.The overall distribution shaped in peak state and was negative skewness,showing bias towards 70 to 90 score levels.The score levels of 60 and 70 were significantly higher than that of their surrounding levels.The scores of aspiration of sputum,oxygenic therapy and aseptic technique were the lowest,while the scores of closed bed making and intramuscular injection were the highest.Conclusions The score distribution of fundamental nursing skills is rational,which shows the methods of teaching and assessment are generally believable.But the individual bias cannot be ignored.The majority of students get high grades.Different levels do exist among different skills because of abstract or concrete characteristics and principal matters.