中国实用护理杂志
中國實用護理雜誌
중국실용호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF PRACTICAL NURSING
2014年
31期
73-76
,共4页
修订版控制态度量表%心脏病%效度%信度
脩訂版控製態度量錶%心髒病%效度%信度
수정판공제태도량표%심장병%효도%신도
Control Attitudes Scale-Revised%Heart disease%Validity%Reliability
目的 引进修订版控制态度量表(Control Attitudes Scale-Revised,CAS-R)并测定其中文版信效度.方法 使用CAS-R量表对125例心内科住院的心脏病患者进行感知控制力测定,并对测定结果进行信效度分析.结果 CAS-R量表重测信度为0.825,分半信度为0.512,整个量表的Cronbach α系数为0.874,各维度的Cronbach α系数在0.735～0.862;因子分析共提取3个公因子,累积方差贡献率为54.128％,且各条目在其公因子上的因子载荷均大于0.4;采用贝克抑郁量表(Beck Depression Inventory,BDI)做效标效度,CAS-R得分与BDI得分的Pearson相关系数为-0.59,与BDI 3个维度自我效能感、心理控制源和习得无助感的Pearson相关系数分别为-0.48、-0.51和0.42.结论 CAS-R中文版具有较好的信效度,适合评价心脏病患者的感知控制力.
目的 引進脩訂版控製態度量錶(Control Attitudes Scale-Revised,CAS-R)併測定其中文版信效度.方法 使用CAS-R量錶對125例心內科住院的心髒病患者進行感知控製力測定,併對測定結果進行信效度分析.結果 CAS-R量錶重測信度為0.825,分半信度為0.512,整箇量錶的Cronbach α繫數為0.874,各維度的Cronbach α繫數在0.735～0.862;因子分析共提取3箇公因子,纍積方差貢獻率為54.128％,且各條目在其公因子上的因子載荷均大于0.4;採用貝剋抑鬱量錶(Beck Depression Inventory,BDI)做效標效度,CAS-R得分與BDI得分的Pearson相關繫數為-0.59,與BDI 3箇維度自我效能感、心理控製源和習得無助感的Pearson相關繫數分彆為-0.48、-0.51和0.42.結論 CAS-R中文版具有較好的信效度,適閤評價心髒病患者的感知控製力.
목적 인진수정판공제태도량표(Control Attitudes Scale-Revised,CAS-R)병측정기중문판신효도.방법 사용CAS-R량표대125례심내과주원적심장병환자진행감지공제력측정,병대측정결과진행신효도분석.결과 CAS-R량표중측신도위0.825,분반신도위0.512,정개량표적Cronbach α계수위0.874,각유도적Cronbach α계수재0.735～0.862;인자분석공제취3개공인자,루적방차공헌솔위54.128％,차각조목재기공인자상적인자재하균대우0.4;채용패극억욱량표(Beck Depression Inventory,BDI)주효표효도,CAS-R득분여BDI득분적Pearson상관계수위-0.59,여BDI 3개유도자아효능감、심리공제원화습득무조감적Pearson상관계수분별위-0.48、-0.51화0.42.결론 CAS-R중문판구유교호적신효도,괄합평개심장병환자적감지공제력.
Objective To translate the English version of Control Attitudes Scale-Revised (CAS-R) into Chinese and to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of CAS-R in patients with heart disease.Methods Totally 125 patients with heart disease were recruited and were investigated by the Chinese version of CAS-R.Results The internal consistency coefficient of the Chinese version of CAS-R ranged from 0.735 to 0.862.Factor analysis got three factors,which explained 54.128％ of the total variance.Using BDI as an external criterion,the correlation coefficients of the CAS-R and BDI scores were-0.59.Pearson coefficient with three dimensions of BDI were-0.48、-0.51 and 0.42.Conclusions The Chinese version of CAS-R has been proved to be reliable and valid.It can be used as a valid tool for the measurement of perceived control in patients with heart disease.
