中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2012年
33期
4008-4010
,共3页
谭江红%王红红%刘丽萍%谢竟%胡玲利
譚江紅%王紅紅%劉麗萍%謝竟%鬍玲利
담강홍%왕홍홍%류려평%사경%호령리
经外周静脉中心静脉导管%超声检查%改良塞丁格技术%成本效果%卫生经济学评价
經外週靜脈中心靜脈導管%超聲檢查%改良塞丁格技術%成本效果%衛生經濟學評價
경외주정맥중심정맥도관%초성검사%개량새정격기술%성본효과%위생경제학평개
PICC%Ultrasound examination%Improved Seldinger%Cost-effectiveness%Health economic evaluation
目的 评价两种PICC置管方法的成本效果.方法 随机抽取2009年5月至2011年4月自愿置管的患者319例,随机分为对照组175例和实验组144例,分别采用套管针穿刺法和超声引导下改良Seldinger穿刺法进行PICC置管,采用成本效果分析对两种置管方法进行卫生经济学评价.结果 对照组带管期间未发生并发症比例、达到预期置管目的的比例及置管舒适度(61.7%,88.6%,44.6%)均低于实验组(97.2%,98.6%,76.4%),差异均有统计学意义(x2值分别为8.868,3.667,5.532;P <0.01).对照组CER(2 622.95)大于实验组(2164.08);敏感度分析对照组CER(2 436.23)大于实验组(2 161.10),提示实验组的成本效果好于对照组.结论 采用超声引导下Seldinger穿刺法PICC置管患者的舒适度更高,置管预期效果好,有良好的成本效果,适合临床推广应用.
目的 評價兩種PICC置管方法的成本效果.方法 隨機抽取2009年5月至2011年4月自願置管的患者319例,隨機分為對照組175例和實驗組144例,分彆採用套管針穿刺法和超聲引導下改良Seldinger穿刺法進行PICC置管,採用成本效果分析對兩種置管方法進行衛生經濟學評價.結果 對照組帶管期間未髮生併髮癥比例、達到預期置管目的的比例及置管舒適度(61.7%,88.6%,44.6%)均低于實驗組(97.2%,98.6%,76.4%),差異均有統計學意義(x2值分彆為8.868,3.667,5.532;P <0.01).對照組CER(2 622.95)大于實驗組(2164.08);敏感度分析對照組CER(2 436.23)大于實驗組(2 161.10),提示實驗組的成本效果好于對照組.結論 採用超聲引導下Seldinger穿刺法PICC置管患者的舒適度更高,置管預期效果好,有良好的成本效果,適閤臨床推廣應用.
목적 평개량충PICC치관방법적성본효과.방법 수궤추취2009년5월지2011년4월자원치관적환자319례,수궤분위대조조175례화실험조144례,분별채용투관침천자법화초성인도하개량Seldinger천자법진행PICC치관,채용성본효과분석대량충치관방법진행위생경제학평개.결과 대조조대관기간미발생병발증비례、체도예기치관목적적비례급치관서괄도(61.7%,88.6%,44.6%)균저우실험조(97.2%,98.6%,76.4%),차이균유통계학의의(x2치분별위8.868,3.667,5.532;P <0.01).대조조CER(2 622.95)대우실험조(2164.08);민감도분석대조조CER(2 436.23)대우실험조(2 161.10),제시실험조적성본효과호우대조조.결론 채용초성인도하Seldinger천자법PICC치관환자적서괄도경고,치관예기효과호,유량호적성본효과,괄합림상추엄응용.
Objective To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of two kinds of PICC placements.Methods 319 patients who were willing to receive PICC placement from May 2009 to April 2011 were selected and randomly divided into two groups:the experimental group (n =144) and the control group (n =175).The control group received conventional technique of PICC placement while the experimental group received ultrasound-guided Seldinger PICC placement.Cost-effectiveness analysis was used to evaluate their health economics.Results The non-complications rate within the periods of inserting PICC,the rate of patients attaining the purpose of PICC placement and patients' were lower in the control group (61.7%,88.6% and 44.6%) than in the experimental group (97.2%,98.6% and 76.4%),and the differences were statistically significant (t =8.868,3.667,5.532,respectively; P < 0.01).Both CER and CER by sensitive analysis were higher in the control group (2 622.95 and 2 436.23) than in the experimental group (2 164.08 and 2 161.10),suggesting that the cost-effectiveness was better in the experimental group than in the control group.Conclusions Patients' comfortable sense and intended placement effect prove to be better with ultrasound-guided Seldingnr PICC placement,which has favorable cost-effectiveness and is worthy of clinical promoting.