中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2013年
8期
910-912
,共3页
李鑫%吴心琦%张娟%王娇玲%孙宇婷
李鑫%吳心琦%張娟%王嬌玲%孫宇婷
리흠%오심기%장연%왕교령%손우정
产妇%剖宫产%护理%个性特征%舒适度
產婦%剖宮產%護理%箇性特徵%舒適度
산부%부궁산%호리%개성특정%서괄도
Delivery women%Cesarean section%Nursing%Personality characteristics%Comfort
目的 探讨剖宫产产妇的个性特征与其术后舒适度的关系及护理对策.方法 采用艾森克人格问卷(EPQ)修订版(成人卷)和重测信效度的中文版Kolcaba舒适状况量表(GCQ)分别对83例健康剖宫产产妇进行调查分析.结果 艾森克人格问卷中神经质(N)因子分与舒适度呈负相关(r=-0.721,P=0.028),N因子分高分组和低分组在GCQ8个项目上的比较,差异具有统计学意义(t值分别为3.42,2.65,3.42,3.42,2.59,2.55,2.73,2.73;P<0.05).结论 剖宫产产妇的神经质因子与术后舒适度密切相关,该因子低分组在舒适度的生理、心理、社会文化和环境等维度上均优于高分组.
目的 探討剖宮產產婦的箇性特徵與其術後舒適度的關繫及護理對策.方法 採用艾森剋人格問捲(EPQ)脩訂版(成人捲)和重測信效度的中文版Kolcaba舒適狀況量錶(GCQ)分彆對83例健康剖宮產產婦進行調查分析.結果 艾森剋人格問捲中神經質(N)因子分與舒適度呈負相關(r=-0.721,P=0.028),N因子分高分組和低分組在GCQ8箇項目上的比較,差異具有統計學意義(t值分彆為3.42,2.65,3.42,3.42,2.59,2.55,2.73,2.73;P<0.05).結論 剖宮產產婦的神經質因子與術後舒適度密切相關,該因子低分組在舒適度的生理、心理、社會文化和環境等維度上均優于高分組.
목적 탐토부궁산산부적개성특정여기술후서괄도적관계급호리대책.방법 채용애삼극인격문권(EPQ)수정판(성인권)화중측신효도적중문판Kolcaba서괄상황량표(GCQ)분별대83례건강부궁산산부진행조사분석.결과 애삼극인격문권중신경질(N)인자분여서괄도정부상관(r=-0.721,P=0.028),N인자분고분조화저분조재GCQ8개항목상적비교,차이구유통계학의의(t치분별위3.42,2.65,3.42,3.42,2.59,2.55,2.73,2.73;P<0.05).결론 부궁산산부적신경질인자여술후서괄도밀절상관,해인자저분조재서괄도적생리、심리、사회문화화배경등유도상균우우고분조.
Objective To explore the relationship between personality characteristics and postoperative comfort among cesarean section dilivery women and explore the nursing strategy.Methods A total of 83 health cesarean section delivery women were investigated with the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ) recension (adult) and the resurvey General Comfort Questionnaire (GCQ).Results The level of ‘ N' factor of EPQ was negatively correlated with the score of comfort (r =-0.721,P =0.028).Significant difference was found in the physiology,psychology,society culture and environment of ‘ N' factors between high score group and low score group (t =3.42,2.65,3.42,2.59,2.55,2.73,2.73,respectively; P < 0.05).Conclusions Close correlation exists between ‘N' factor (Nervous) and postoperative comfort among cesarean section delivery women.In high score group,the comfort of physiology and psychology,society culture and environment was better than that in low score group.