中华现代护理杂志
中華現代護理雜誌
중화현대호리잡지
CHINESE JOURNAL OF MODERN NURSING
2013年
18期
2154-2156
,共3页
李兴革%张巧利%罗学斌%张建芳%陈丽泓
李興革%張巧利%囉學斌%張建芳%陳麗泓
리흥혁%장교리%라학빈%장건방%진려홍
创伤失血性休克%限制性液体复苏%急救护理
創傷失血性休剋%限製性液體複囌%急救護理
창상실혈성휴극%한제성액체복소%급구호리
Uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock trauma%Restrictive liquid recovery%First aid nursing
目的 探讨限制性液体复苏对创伤失血性休克患者的效果与急救护理措施.方法 将100例创伤失血性休克患者按数字表法随机分为对照组和观察组各50例,两组均采用急救护理程序进行急救,对照组采取常规液体复苏方法,观察组给予限制性液体复苏,比较两组患者抢救成功率、病死率、急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)发生率、多器官功能障碍综合征(MODS)发生率、复苏时间、患者家属对急救护理工作满意度.结果 观察组患者抢救成功率、病死率、ARDS发生率、MODS发生率分别为80%,20%,4%,16%,对照组分别为60%,40%,28%,38%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(x2值分别为7.24,6.95,8.63,7.84;P <0.01);观察组复苏时间(95.67±25.03) min,对照组(200.18±35.12)min;观察组患者家属对急救护理工作满意度为(98.45±0.91)分,对照组为(91.12±4.07)分;两组复苏时间和满意度比较差异均有统计学意义(t值分别为5.23,4.59;P<O.01).结论 创伤失血性休克患者应用限制性液体复苏,同时根据急救护理程序实施急救护理,可减少MODS和ARDS的发生,降低患者的病死率,提高抢救成功率和患者家属对急救护理工作的满意度.
目的 探討限製性液體複囌對創傷失血性休剋患者的效果與急救護理措施.方法 將100例創傷失血性休剋患者按數字錶法隨機分為對照組和觀察組各50例,兩組均採用急救護理程序進行急救,對照組採取常規液體複囌方法,觀察組給予限製性液體複囌,比較兩組患者搶救成功率、病死率、急性呼吸窘迫綜閤徵(ARDS)髮生率、多器官功能障礙綜閤徵(MODS)髮生率、複囌時間、患者傢屬對急救護理工作滿意度.結果 觀察組患者搶救成功率、病死率、ARDS髮生率、MODS髮生率分彆為80%,20%,4%,16%,對照組分彆為60%,40%,28%,38%,兩組比較差異有統計學意義(x2值分彆為7.24,6.95,8.63,7.84;P <0.01);觀察組複囌時間(95.67±25.03) min,對照組(200.18±35.12)min;觀察組患者傢屬對急救護理工作滿意度為(98.45±0.91)分,對照組為(91.12±4.07)分;兩組複囌時間和滿意度比較差異均有統計學意義(t值分彆為5.23,4.59;P<O.01).結論 創傷失血性休剋患者應用限製性液體複囌,同時根據急救護理程序實施急救護理,可減少MODS和ARDS的髮生,降低患者的病死率,提高搶救成功率和患者傢屬對急救護理工作的滿意度.
목적 탐토한제성액체복소대창상실혈성휴극환자적효과여급구호리조시.방법 장100례창상실혈성휴극환자안수자표법수궤분위대조조화관찰조각50례,량조균채용급구호리정서진행급구,대조조채취상규액체복소방법,관찰조급여한제성액체복소,비교량조환자창구성공솔、병사솔、급성호흡군박종합정(ARDS)발생솔、다기관공능장애종합정(MODS)발생솔、복소시간、환자가속대급구호리공작만의도.결과 관찰조환자창구성공솔、병사솔、ARDS발생솔、MODS발생솔분별위80%,20%,4%,16%,대조조분별위60%,40%,28%,38%,량조비교차이유통계학의의(x2치분별위7.24,6.95,8.63,7.84;P <0.01);관찰조복소시간(95.67±25.03) min,대조조(200.18±35.12)min;관찰조환자가속대급구호리공작만의도위(98.45±0.91)분,대조조위(91.12±4.07)분;량조복소시간화만의도비교차이균유통계학의의(t치분별위5.23,4.59;P<O.01).결론 창상실혈성휴극환자응용한제성액체복소,동시근거급구호리정서실시급구호리,가감소MODS화ARDS적발생,강저환자적병사솔,제고창구성공솔화환자가속대급구호리공작적만의도.
Objective To discuss the effect of restrictive fluid resuscitation on trauma patients with uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock and first aid.Methods Totals of 100 patients with trauma patients with uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock randomly divided into control group and observation group with each group of fifty cases,and control group adopt conventional liquid recovery method,observation group was given restrictive fluid resuscitation.Observed and compared two groups of patients cure rate,mortality,and ARDS incidence,MODS incidence,recovery liquid quantity,recovery time,satisfaction of patients and families on first aid job.Results The incidence of patients' cure rate,mortality,ARDS,and MODS in observation group respectively were 80%,20%,4%,8% and that in control group were 60%,40%,28%,38%,and the difference was statistically significant (x2 =7.24,6.95,8.63,7.84,respectively; P < 0.01).Recovery time in observation group were significantly shorter than that in control group [(95.67 ± 25.03) vs (200.18 ± 35.12) mins; t =5.23,P < 0.01],and the satisfaction of patients and families to first aid job in observation group was higher than that in control group [(98.45 ± 0.91) vs (91.12 ± 4.07) ; t =4.59,P < 0.01)].Conclusions Trauma patients with uncontrolled hemorrhagic shock application restrictive fluid resuscitation,and at the same time,according to the first aid program first aid care,can reduce the occurrence of MODS and ARDS patients,reduce the mortality and improve the cure rate and satisfaction of patients and families on first aid.